How cited: Newport v. Hatton · Go Syfert

Newport v. Hatton (1929)

green · 28 citation events across 3 courts. Showing the 7 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
All Green 7
Treatment trajectory · 1932 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
193219792026
Sort: By significance · Most recent
green OC Interior Services, LLC v. Nationstar Mortgage, LLC (2017)
Rule Authority · Cal. Ct. App.
The title of such a purchaser may not be successfully questioned even though he admits by pleading, or fails to object to the admission in evidence of, facts tending to show that the judgment or order upon which it is based is invalid.” (Marlenee v. Brown (1943) 21 Cal.2d 668, 678 [ 134 P.2d 770 ] (Marlenee).) We describe this as the ‘“exception to the Hill rule.” As examples of similar situations applying the exception to the Hill rule, the Marlenee court cited Garrison, su…
green Kerr Land & Timber Co. v. Emmerson (1965)
Rule Authority · Cal. Ct. App.
Bank v. Marxen (1941) 19 Cal.2d 100, 103 [ 119 P.2d 131 ]; Beam v. Duggan (1940) 37 Cal.App.2d 491, 496-497 [ 99 P.2d 694 ]; Newport v. Hatton (1929) 207 Cal. 515, 517-520 [ 279 P. 134 ]; Cooley v. Miller & Lux (1914) 168 Cal. 120, 123-124 [ 142 P. 83 ]; Gibbs v. Peterson (1912) 163 Cal. 758, 763-765 [ 127 P. 62 ]; James v. E.
green Universal Land Co. v. All Persons (1959)
Rule Authority · Cal. Ct. App.
That much is not disputed. ” See also Newport v. Hatton (1929), 207 Cal. 515, 520 [ 279 P. 134 ] ; Ferguson v. Ferguson (1943), 58 Cal.App.2d 811, 814 [ 137 P.2d 735 ] ; Wool v. Scott (1956), 140 Cal.App.2d 835, 843 [ 296 P.2d 17 ] ; Marlenee v. Brown (1943), 21 Cal.2d 668, 678 [ 134 P.2d 770 ].
green Richardson v. Michel (1943)
Rule Authority · Cal. Ct. App.
(Gallatin v. Corning Irrigation Co., 163 Cal. 405, 422 [ 126 P. 864 , Ann.Cas.1914A 74]; Newport v. Hatton, 207 Cal. 515, 519 [ 279 P. 134 ] ; Tally v. Ganahl, 151 Cal. 418, 421 [ 90 P. 1049 ].) Following the decision of the District Court of Appeal that the action was barred if the plaintiff had knowledge of the transfers more than three years before filing suit, the trial court and this court are both bound by that holding as the law of the case.
green Ferguson v. Ferguson (1943)
Rule Authority · Cal. Ct. App.
(Newport v. Hatton, 207 Cal. 515, 520 [ 279 P. 134 ]; Garrison v. Blanchard, 127 Cal.App. 616, 622 [ 16 P.2d 273 ]; Marlenee V.
green Marlenee v. Brown (1943)
Rule Authority · Cal.
(Garrison v. Blanchard, 127 Cal.App. 616, 621-623 [ 16 P.2d 273 ]; Doyle v. Hampton, 159 Cal. 729, 733, 734 [ 116 P. 39 ]; Reeve v. Kennedy, 43 Cal. 643, 650-653 ; and see Follette v. Pacific L. & P. Corp., 189 Cal. 193, 205, 214 [ 208 P. 295 , 23 A.L.R. 965 ]; Newport v. Hatton, 207 Cal. 515, 519, 520 [ 279 P. 134 ] ; Dunn v. Dunn, 114 Cal. 210 [ 46 P. 5 ] ; Wood v. Roach, 125 Cal.App. 631, 640 [ 14 P.2d 170 ].) The discovery of a defect not apparent in the record should no…
green Penziner v. West American Finance Co. (1937)
Rule Authority · Cal.
Co., 157 Cal. 339, 342 [ 107 Pac. 699 ], Tally v. Canahl, 151 Cal. 418, 421 [ 90 Pac. 1049 ], Newport v. Hatton, 207 Cal. 515, 519 [ 279 Pac. 134 ], and McEwen v. New York Life Ins.