How cited: Freed Freed v. Miami Beach Pier Corporation · Go Syfert

Freed Freed v. Miami Beach Pier Corporation (1927)

green · 48 citation events across 5 courts. Showing the 7 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1933 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
193319792026
green 5F, LLC v. Dresing (2014)
Rule Authority · Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
Since the pier was constructed pursuant to the proper authority and the Freeds were on notice of the construction but only took legal action after construction had begun and large sums of money had been expended, the supreme court • denied the Freeds’ request for an injunction. 6 Id. at 844-45.
Cited · 4th Cir. · signal: see · 4 citations in this opinion
See Freed v. Miami Beach Pier Corp., 93 Fla. 888 , 112 So. 841 , 52 A.L.R. 1177 ; Aborn v. Smith, 12 R.I. 370 ; Stuart v. Greanyea, 154 Mich. 132 , 117 N.W. 655 , 25 L.R.A.,N.S., 257.
Cited (see also) · Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · signal: see, e.g. · 2 citations in this opinion
Corp. v. Div. of Admin., State Dep’t of Transp., 413 So. 2d 847, 851 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982) (Hershey, J., concurring specially)); see, e.g., Freed v. Miami Beach Pier Corp., 112 So. 841, 844-45 (Fla. 1927) (“Riparian or littoral owners to ordinary high-water mark on the ocean or gulf or other navigable waters have, by the common law, a qualified right with the consent or acquiescence of the state to erect wharves or piers or docks in front of the riparian holdings to facilitate…
green Lanier v. Jones (1993)
Cited · Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See Freed v. Miami Beach Pier Corp., 93 Fla. 888 , 112 So. 841 (1927).
Cited (see also) · Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · signal: see also · 2 citations in this opinion
See, also, Freed v. Miami Beach Pier Corp., 93 Fla. 888 , 112 So. 841 , 52 A.L.R. 1177 .
Cited · Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See the cases of Freed v. Miami Beach Pier Corporation, 1927, 93 Fla. 888 , 112 So. 841 , 52 A.L.R. 1177 ; Bridgehead Land Co., etc. v. Hale, 1941, 145 Fla. 389 , 199 So. 361 ; and Tampa Southern R.
Cited · Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · signal: see
See Freed v. Miami Beach Pier Corp., 112 So. 841, 845 (Fla. 1927) (noting that when "structures or objects are put upon lands below high-water mark . . . any substantial encroachment upon the rights of others may be remedied . . . in due course of law at the instance of proper parties, but the rights of individuals to remedy may be waived by undue delay or laches").