Freed Freed v. Miami Beach Pier Corporation (1927)
green
· 48 citation events
across 5 courts.
Showing the 7 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1933 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
193319792026
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
green
5F, LLC v. Dresing (2014)
Since the pier was constructed pursuant to the proper authority and the Freeds were on notice of the construction but only took legal action after construction had begun and large sums of money had been expended, the supreme court • denied the Freeds’ request for an injunction. 6 Id. at 844-45.
green
Mayor and City Council v. Crown Cork & Seal Co. (1941)
See Freed v. Miami Beach Pier Corp., 93 Fla. 888 , 112 So. 841 , 52 A.L.R. 1177 ; Aborn v. Smith, 12 R.I. 370 ; Stuart v. Greanyea, 154 Mich. 132 , 117 N.W. 655 , 25 L.R.A.,N.S., 257.
Corp. v. Div. of Admin., State Dep’t of Transp., 413 So. 2d 847, 851 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982) (Hershey, J., concurring specially)); see, e.g., Freed v. Miami Beach Pier Corp., 112 So. 841, 844-45 (Fla. 1927) (“Riparian or littoral owners to ordinary high-water mark on the ocean or gulf or other navigable waters have, by the common law, a qualified right with the consent or acquiescence of the state to erect wharves or piers or docks in front of the riparian holdings to facilitate…
green
Lanier v. Jones (1993)
See Freed v. Miami Beach Pier Corp., 93 Fla. 888 , 112 So. 841 (1927).
green
Shirley v. Lake Butler Corporation (1960)
See, also, Freed v. Miami Beach Pier Corp., 93 Fla. 888 , 112 So. 841 , 52 A.L.R. 1177 .
green
City of Eustis v. Firster (1959)
See the cases of Freed v. Miami Beach Pier Corporation, 1927, 93 Fla. 888 , 112 So. 841 , 52 A.L.R. 1177 ; Bridgehead Land Co., etc. v. Hale, 1941, 145 Fla. 389 , 199 So. 361 ; and Tampa Southern R.
green
Brown, Leblanc-Simard v. Thomas, Thomas (2025)
See Freed v. Miami Beach Pier Corp., 112 So. 841, 845 (Fla. 1927) (noting that when "structures or objects are put upon lands below high-water mark . . . any substantial encroachment upon the rights of others may be remedied . . . in due course of law at the instance of proper parties, but the rights of individuals to remedy may be waived by undue delay or laches").