How cited: Cluster 366299 · Go Syfert

Cluster 366299 (1979)

green · 41 citation events across 18 courts. Showing the 12 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1979 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
197920022026
Rule Authority · 11th Cir. · signal: cf.
Cf. In re Roloff, 598 F.2d 783, 785-87 (3d Cir.1979) (holding under a previous version of the Bankruptcy Code that the bankruptcy court’s broad equitable powers do not include a power “to adjudicate once more, in a full trial, the merits and amount of each lien already determined to be owed”).
Rule Authority · 3rd Cir.
IOP, Chapter 8c at 25. 6 Government of Virgin Islands v. Martinez, 780 F.2d 302 , 310 n. 10 (3d Cir.1985); Wolk v. Saks Fifth Avenue Inc., 728 F.2d 221 , 224 n. 3 (3d Cir.1984); Matter of Roloff, 598 F.2d 783, 786 (3d Cir.1979) 7 This principle has been well recognized in the decisions of this court, e.g., United Food and Commercial Workers Union v. N.L.R.B., 788 F.2d 178 , 182-83 n. 7 (3d Cir.1986); United States v. Accetturo, 783 F.2d 382, 395 (3d Cir.1986) (Sloviter, J., …
Rule Authority · 3rd Cir.
Government of Virgin Islands v. Martinez, 780 F.2d 302 , 310 n. 10 (3d Cir.1985); Wolk v. Saks Fifth Avenue Inc., 728 F.2d 221 , 224 n. 3 (3d Cir.1984); Matter of Roloff, 598 F.2d 783, 786 (3d Cir.1979). .
Rule Authority · 3rd Cir.
Id. 11 In defending against a creditor's complaint, the debtor must meet four issues: 12 (1) Does the debtor have equity in the encumbered property; 13 (2) will the secured creditor suffer undue harm from a continuation of the stay; 14 (3) is there a reasonable prospect for a successful reorganization; and 15 (4) will the prospects for reorganization be affected by withdrawal of the encumbered property from the estate? 16 See In re Roloff, 598 F.2d 783, 789 (3d Cir. 1979).
Cited (see also) · 4th Cir. · signal: see also
See also In re Roloff, 598 F.2d 783, 788 (3d Cir.1979) (provision for relief from stay was not a grant of jurisdiction to bankruptcy court to hear counterclaims or affirmative defenses as to substance of prior state court foreclosure proceedings). 25 A bankruptcy court is a court of equity.
Cited (see also) · 4th Cir. · signal: see also
See also In re Ro-loff 598 F.2d 783 , 788 (3d Cir.1979) (provision for relief from stay was not a grant of jurisdiction to bankruptcy court to hear counterclaims or affirmative defenses as to substance of prior state court foreclosure proceedings).
Cited (see also) · 4th Cir. · signal: see also
See also In re Roloff 598 F.2d 783, 788 (3d Cir.1979) (provision for relief from stay was not a grant of jurisdiction to bankruptcy court to hear counterclaims or affirmative defenses as to substance of prior state court foreclosure proceedings).
Cited · 10th Cir. · signal: see
See In re Roloff, 598 F.2d 783, 785 (3d Cir.1979).
Cited · 10th Cir. · signal: see
See In re Roloff, 598 F.2d 783, 785 (3d Cir.1979).
Cited · 3rd Cir. · signal: see
See In re Roloff, 598 F.2d 783, 789 (3d Cir. 1979).
Cited · Bankr. E.D. Pa. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See Matter of Roloff, 598 F.2d 783 (3d Cir. 1979). *688 In this regard, Midwest’s reliance on Roloff, supra, to support its interpretation of section 17(c)(3) (N.T. 104) is inappropriate.
Cited · Bankr. D.N.J. · signal: see
See In Re Roloff, 598 F.2d 783 (3d Cir. 1979).