Herweg v. Ray (1980)
green
· 25 citation events
across 8 courts.
Showing the 13 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1980 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
198020032026
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
green
Davis v. Reagen (1980)
Having carefully considered appellant’s argument, we agree with the district court that Davis’ constitutional claims satisfy the minimal standards set forth in Hagans v. Lavine, supra. 6 Cf. Herweg v. Ray, 619 F.2d 1265, 1269 (8th Cir. 1980) (en banc) (due process and equal protection claims presented substantial constitutional questions); Peske v. Tangedahl, 619 F.2d 729 (8th Cir. 1980) (cause remanded for consideration of the substantiality of plaintiff’s constitutional cl…
en banc
green
Davis v. Reagen (1980)
Appellant argues, however, that the constitutional claims presented by Davis were not sufficiently substantial to confer jurisdiction. 12 Having carefully considered appellant's argument, we agree with the district court that Davis' constitutional claims satisfy the minimal standards set forth in Hagans v. Lavine, supra. 6 Cf. Herweg v. Ray, 619 F.2d 1265, 1269 (8th Cir. 1980) (en banc) (due process and equal protection claims presented substantial constitutional questions);…
en banc
green
Peske v. Tangedahl (1980)
See Chapman v. Houston Welfare Rights Organization, supra, 441 U.S. at 618 n.36, 99 S.Ct. at 1916 n.36; id. at 675 , 99 S.Ct. at 1946 (Stewart, J., dissenting); Her-weg v. Ray, 619 F.2d 1265, at 1269 (8th Cir. 1980) (en banc) (equally divided court 5 ); Oldham v. Ehrlich, 617 F.2d 163, at 168-169 (8th Cir. Mar. 12,1980).
en banc
green
Peske v. Tangedahl (1980)
See Chapman v. Houston Welfare Rights Organization, supra, 441 U.S. at 618 n.36, 99 S.Ct. at 1916 n.36; id. at 675 , 99 S.Ct. at 1946 (Stewart, J., dissenting); Herweg v. Ray, 619 F.2d 1265, at 1269 (8th Cir. 1980) (en banc) (equally divided court 5 ); Oldham v. Ehrlich, 617 F.2d 163, at 168-169 (8th Cir. Mar. 12, 1980). 6 The determinative jurisdictional question is therefore whether Peske's complaint alleged a substantial constitutional claim.
en banc
green
Schweiker v. Gray Panthers (1981)
See Herweg v. Ray, 619 F. 2d 1265, 1272 (CA8 1980) (en banc) (opinion of Ross, J.) (aff'g by an equally divided court 481 F. Supp. 914 (SD Iowa 1978)), cert. pending, No. 80-60.
en banc
green
Gray Panthers v. Administrator, Health Care Financing Administration, Department of Health and Human Services (1980)
See Herweg v. Ray, 619 F.2d 1265 (8th Cir. 1980) (equally divided court sitting en banc ) (opinion of McMillian, J.).
equally divided court sitting en banc
green
United States v. Cerceda (1998)
See Reshard v. Britt, 839 F.2d 1499 (11th Cir.1988) (en banc) (affirming district court's order in its entirety by an equally divided court); see also Herweg v. Ray, 619 F.2d 1265 (8th Cir.1980) (en banc), rev'd on other grounds, 455 U.S. 265 , 102 S.Ct. 1059 , 71 L.Ed.2d 137 (1982) (affirming district court's judgment in part by an equally divided court and reversing it in part); Pennsylvania v. O'Neill, 473 F.2d 1029 (3d Cir.1973) (en banc) (affirming district court's orde…
green
United States v. Cerceda (1998)
Garrudo, which involved seven defendants who received new trials, is the only published district court opinion in this case. 12 divided court); see also Herweg v. Ray, 619 F.2d 1265 (8th Cir. 1980) (en banc), rev’d on other grounds, 455 U.S. 265 , 102 S. Ct. 1059 , 71 L.
en banc
green
Pinneke v. Preisser (1980)
See also Herweg v. Ray, 619 F.2d 1265, at 1269 (8th Cir. 1980); Oldham v. Ehrlich, 617 F.2d 163, at 166-168 (8th Cir. 1980).
green
Pinneke v. Preisser (1980)
See also Herweg v. Ray, 619 F.2d 1265, at 1269 (8th Cir. 1980); Oldham v. Ehrlich, 617 F.2d 163, at 166-168 (8th Cir. 1980). 6 The District Court found that by virtue of 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1343(3) and (4) it had jurisdiction over Pinneke's complaint raising issues arising under the equal protection, due process, and supremacy clauses of the Constitution.
green
United States v. Angel Cerceda, United States of America v. Courtney Ricardo Alford, A.K.A. \Rickey\" Edward … (1999)
See Reshard v. Britt, 839 F.2d 1499 (11th Cir.1988) (en banc) (affirming district court's order in its entirety by an equally divided court); see also Herweg v. Ray, 619 F.2d 1265 (8th Cir.1980) (en banc), rev'd on other grounds, 455 U.S. 265 , 102 S.Ct. 1059 , 71 L.Ed.2d 137 (1982) (affirming district court's judgment in part by an equally divided court and reversing it in part); Pennsylvania v. O'Neill, 473 F.2d 1029 (3d Cir.1973) (en banc) (affirming district court's orde…
green
United States v. Cerceda (1999)
See Reshard v. Britt, 839 F.2d 1499 (11th Cir.1988) (en banc) (affirming district court’s order in its entirety by an equally divided court); see also Herweg v. Ray, 619 F.2d 1265 (8th Cir.1980) (en banc), rev’d on other grounds, 455 U.S. 265 , 102 S.Ct. 1059 , 71 L.Ed.2d 137 (1982) (affirming district court’s judgment in part by an equally divided court and reversing it in part); Pennsylvania v. O’Neill, 473 F.2d 1029 (3d Cir.1973) (en banc) (affirming district court’s orde…
green
Edwards v. Griepentrog (1992)
See Herweg v. Ray, 619 F.2d 1265, 1281 (8th Cir.1980) (J.