How cited: Jimmy Dale Lofton, in Pro Se v. Margaret M. Heckler, as Secretary of Health and Human Ser… · Go Syfert

Jimmy Dale Lofton, in Pro Se v. Margaret M. Heckler, as Secretary of Health and Human Services (1986)

green · 50 citation events across 12 courts. Showing the 32 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1986 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
198620062026
Rule Authority · 4th Cir. · 6 citations in this opinion
Hilliard v. United States Postal Service, 814 F.2d 325, 327 (6th Cir.1987); Lofton v. Heckler, 781 F.2d 1390, 1392 (9th Cir.1986) (per curiam); 4 King v. Dole, 782 F.2d 274, 275-77 (D.C.Cir.) (per curiam ), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 856 , 107 S.Ct. 194 , 93 L.Ed.2d 126 (1986).
Rule Authority · 9th Cir. · 2 citations in this opinion
Lofton v. Heckler, 781 F.2d 1390, 1392 (9th Cir.1986).
Rule Authority · 9th Cir. · 2 citations in this opinion
Since we may affirm the trial court’s decision on any ground supported by the record, 3 Lofton v. Heckler, 781 F.2d 1390, 1392 (9th Cir.1986); accord Smith v. Block, 784 F.2d 993 , 996 n. 4 (9th Cir.1986); Bloom v. General Truck Drivers, Office, Food & Warehouse Union, Local 952, 783 F.2d 1356 , 1363 n. 16 (9th Cir.1986), we need not address the merits of the trial court’s ruling excluding this evidence under Rule 403. 4 We also conclude that Lewy’s remaining challenges to t…
Rule Authority · 9th Cir.
Lofton v. Heckler, 781 F.2d 1390, 1392 (9th Cir.1986) (per curiam). 1.
Rule Authority · 9th Cir.
Lofton v. Heckler, 781 F.2d 1390, 1392 (9th Cir.1986). 1.
Rule Authority · 9th Cir.
See, e.g., Lubniewski v. Lehman, 891 F.2d 216, 218-20 (9th Cir.1989); Johnston v. Horne, 875 F.2d 1415, 1418-19 (9th Cir.1989); Hymen v. Merit Systems Protection Board, 799 F.2d 1421, 1422 (9th Cir.1986), ce rt. denied, 481 U.S. 1019 , 107 S.Ct. 1900 , 95 L.Ed.2d 506 (1987); Koucky v. Department of Navy, 820 F.2d 300, 302 (9th Cir.1987); Lofton v. Heckler, 781 F.2d 1390, 1392 (9th Cir.1986). .
Rule Authority · 9th Cir.
See, e.g., Lubniewski v. Lehman, 891 F.2d 216, 218-20 (9th Cir.1989); Johnston v. Horne, 875 F.2d 1415, 1418-19 (9th Cir.1989); Hymen v. Merit Systems Protection Board, 799 F.2d 1421, 1422 (9th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1019 , 107 S.Ct. 1900 , 95 L.Ed.2d 506 (1987); Koucky v. Department of Navy, 820 F.2d 300, 302 (9th Cir.1987); Lofton v. Heckler, 781 F.2d 1390, 1392 (9th Cir.1986) 5 By our action we imply no disagreement with the views expressed by the district cour…
Rule Authority · 9th Cir.
Lofton v. Heckler, 781 F.2d 1390, 1392 (9th Cir.1986). 1.
Rule Authority · 9th Cir.
Lofton v. Heckler, 781 F.2d 1390, 1392 (9th Cir.1986).
Rule Authority · 9th Cir.
Lofton v. Heckler, 781 F.2d 1390, 1392 (9th Cir.1986).
Rule Authority · 9th Cir.
Lofton v. Heckler, 781 F.2d 1390, 1392 (9th Cir.1986).
Rule Authority · 8th Cir.
See, e.g., Hilliard v. United States Postal Serv., 814 F.2d 325, 327 (6th Cir.1987); King v. Dole, 782 F.2d 274 , 275-76 and n. 2 (D.C.Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 107 S.Ct. 194 (1986); Lofton v. Heckler, 781 F.2d 1390, 1392 (9th Cir.1986) (per curiam).
Rule Authority · 8th Cir.
See, e.g., Hilliard v. United States Postal Serv., 814 F.2d 325, 327 (6th Cir.1987); King v. Dole, 782 F.2d 274 , 275-76 and n. 2 (D.C.Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 107 S.Ct. 194 (1986); Lofton v. Heckler, 781 F.2d 1390, 1392 (9th Cir.1986) (per curiam).
Rule Authority · 9th Cir.
Lofton v. Heckler, 781 F.2d 1390, 1392 (9th Cir.1986); Cooper v. United States Postal Service, 740 F.2d 714, 716 (9th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1022 , 105 S.Ct. 2034 , 85 L.Ed.2d 316 (1985).
Rule Authority · D. Me.
See Hilliard v. United States Postal Service, 814 F.2d 325, 327 (6th Cir.1987); King v. Dole, 782 F.2d 274, 275 (D.C.Cir.1986); Lofton v. Heckler, 781 F.2d 1390, 1392 (9th Cir.1986). 7 Here, because the time limitations in section 1821(d)(6) are jurisdictional prerequisites, 8 the Court may not apply Rule 6(a) to extend the Court’s jurisdiction over Plaintiffs’ untimely filed Complaint.
Rule Authority · E.D. Mo.
See Scinto v. Kollman, 667 F.Supp. 1106, 1107 (D.Md. 1987) (citing uncertainty in the validity of a defense at the time answer was filed as grounds for allowing amendment); see also Johnson v. Burnley, 887 F.2d 471, 475-79 (4th Cir.1989), vacated, reh’g en banc granted, (Jan. 2, 1990) (concluding § 7703(b)(2) is in the nature of a statute of limitations); Hilliard v. United States Postal Serv., 814 F.2d 325, 327 (6th Cir. 1987) (concluding § 7703(b)(2) is jurisdictional); Ki…
Rule Authority · W.D.N.C.
See generally Johnson v. Burnley, 887 F.2d 471, 474-79 (4th Cir.1989); but see Hilliard v. United States Postal Service, 814 F.2d 325, 327 (6th Cir.1987) (holding that 30-day time limit is a subject matter jurisdictional requirement); Lofton v. Heckler, 781 F.2d 1390, 1392 (9th Cir.1986) (per curiam) (same); King v. Dole, 782 F.2d 274, 275-77 (D.C.Cir.) (same); cert. denied, 479 U.S. 856 , 107 S.Ct. 194 , 93 L.Ed.2d 126 (1986).
Rule Authority · S.D.N.Y.
King v. Dole, 782 F.2d 274, 275-76 (D.C. *366 Cir.1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 856 , 107 S.Ct. 194 , 93 L.Ed.2d 126 (1986); Hilliard v. U.S. Postal Service, 814 F.2d 325, 327 (6th Cir.1987); Lofton v. Heckler, 781 F.2d 1390, 1392 (9th Cir.1986); see also, Taylor v. Tisch, 686 F.Supp. 304, 308 (S.D.Fla.1988).
green Taylor v. Tisch (1988)
Rule Authority · S.D. Fla.
See Hilliard v. United States Postal Service, 814 F.2d 325, 327 (6th Cir. 1987); King v. Dole, 782 F.2d 274 , 275-76 and n. 2 (D.C.Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 856 , 107 S.Ct. 194 , 93 L.Ed.2d 126 (1986); Lofton v. Heckler, 781 F.2d 1390, 1392 (9th Cir.1986) (per curiam); James v. United States Postal Service, 835 *308 F.2d 1265 (8th Cir.1988); cf. Lee, 774 F.2d at 1068 -69 n. 2 (reserving ruling on the issue).
Rule Authority · E.D.N.Y
Lofton v. Heckler, 781 F.2d 1390, 1392 (9th Cir.1986); Hall v. Small Business Administration, 695 F.2d 175, 180 (5th Cir.1983); Newbold v. United States Postal Service, 614 F.2d 46, 47 (5th Cir.) (per curiam) cert. denied, 449 U.S. 878 , 101 S.Ct. 225 , 66 L.Ed.2d 101 (1980); Canino v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, 707 F.2d 468 , 472 (11th Cir.1983).
Cited · 1st Cir. · signal: see
See Williams-Scaife v. Department of Defense Dependent Schools, 925 F.2d 346 (9th Cir. 1991) (holding that Irwin effectively overruled all prior Ninth Circuit cases which had denied equitable tolling under statutes and regulations relating to federal employee -7- discrimination suits, including one which had denied tolling under 5 U.S.C. 7703(b)(2), Lofton v. Heckler, 781 F.2d 1390, 1392 (9th Cir. 1986)); Ware v. Frank, 1992 U.S. Dist.
Cited · 1st Cir. · signal: see
See Williams-Scaife v. Department of Defense Dependent Schools, 925 F.2d 346 (9th Cir.1991) (holding that Irwin effectively overruled all prior Ninth Circuit cases which had denied equitable tolling under statutes and regulations relating to federal employee discrimination suits, including one which had denied tolling under 5 U.S.C. § 7703 (b)(2), Lofton v. Heckler, 781 F.2d 1390, 1392 (9th Cir.1986)); Ware v. Frank, 1992 WL 19861 , 1992 U.S. Dist.
Cited · 9th Cir. · signal: see
See, Lofton v. Heckler, 781 F.2d 1390, 1392 (9th Cir.1986).
Cited · 9th Cir. · signal: see
See Lofton v. Heckler, 781 F.2d 1390, 1392 (9th Cir.1986) (“statutory time periods for filing Title YII actions are jurisdictional and are strictly enforced”). 2 Under Fed.R.Civ.P. 15(a), a plaintiff may amend his complaint once, as of right, at any time prior to the filing of a responsive pleading.
green Conner v. Burford (1988)
Cited · 9th Cir. · signal: see
See Lofton v. Heckler, 781 F.2d 1390, 1392 (9th Cir.1986); Seattle Times Co. v. Seattle Mailers' Union No. 32, 664 F.2d 1366 , 1369 n. 2 (9th Cir.1982) 49 As it stands, the order is open to the interpretation that the leases themselves have been set aside.
green Conner v. Burford (1988)
Cited · 9th Cir. · signal: see
See Lofton v. Heckler, 781 F.2d 1390, 1392 (9th Cir.1986); Seattle Times Co. v. Seattle Mailers’ Union No. 32, 664 F.2d 1366 , 1369 n. 2 (9th Cir.1982). .
green Conner v. Burford (1988)
Cited · 9th Cir. · signal: see
See Lofton v. Heckler, 781 F.2d 1390, 1392 (9th Cir.1986); Seattle Times Co. v. Seattle Mailers' Union No. 32, 664 F.2d 1366 , 1369 n. 2 (9th Cir.1982) 48 As it stands, the order is open to the interpretation that the leases themselves have been set aside.
green Conner v. Burford (1988)
Cited · 9th Cir. · signal: see
See Lofton v. Heckler, 781 F.2d 1390, 1392 (9th Cir.1986); Seattle Times Co. v. Seattle Mailers’ Union No. 32, 664 F.2d 1366 , 1369 n. 2 (9th Cir.1982). .As it stands, the order is open to the interpretation that the leases themselves have been set aside.
Cited · 9th Cir. · signal: see
See 781 F.2d at 1392 .
Cited (see also) · 6th Cir. · signal: see also
Id. at 277 ; see also Lofton v. Heckler, 781 F.2d 1390 (9th Cir.1986) (pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 7703 (b)(2), appellant’s failure to file within 30 days after receipt of notice of judicially reviewable action deprived court of jurisdiction.) In the present case, appellant’s arguments that the notions of fundamental fairness require that the limitations period be extended is without merit.