Yellen v. Confederated Tribes of Chehalis Reservation (2021)
green
· 65 citation events
across 15 courts.
Showing the 33 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 2021 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
202120232026
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
green
Sunshine State Regional Center, Inc. v. Director, US Citizenship and Immigration Services (2025)
Cf. Yellen v. Confederated Tribes of Chehalis Rsrv., 594 U.S. 338, 359 (2021) (dis- cussing interpretive canons giving way because of a “contextually implausible outcome”).
dis- cussing interpretive canons giving way because of a “contextually implausible outcome”
green
Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Robert F. Kennedy Jr. (2025)
By contrast, in Bruesewitz v. Wyeth LLC, 562 U.S. 223 , 233–35 (2011), a statute that spoke about “unavoidable” side effects did not incorporate a comment from the Second Restatement of Torts that carved out “unavoidably unsafe products” because “unavoidable” is “hardly a rarely used word” and there is no “special significance to the term ‘unavoidable’ standing alone.” And in Yellen v. Confederated Tribes of Chehalis Rsrv., 594 U.S. 338, 353 (2021), the Court rejected the no…
green
United States v. Chavarria (2025)
But the federal kidnapping statute contains no reference to that authority, and the government has not made such an argument here. 10 Appellate Case: 23-2102 Document: 94-1 Date Filed: 06/16/2025 Page: 11 intended that the term have its specialized meaning.” Durham, 902 F.3d at 1197 ; see also Yellen v. Confederated Tribes of Chehalis Rsrv., 594 U.S. 338, 354 (2021) (“[T]his Court reads statutory language as a term of art only when the language was used in that way at the ti…
“[T]his Court reads statutory language as a term of art only when the language was used in that way at the time of the statute’s adoption.”
Kinsey relies on the Supreme Court’s discussion of this canon in Yellen v. Confederated Tribes of Che- halis Reservation, in which the Court said, “[t]he most gram- matical reading of a sentence in a vacuum does not always produce the best reading in context.” 594 U.S. 338, 359 (2021).
Kinsey relies on the Supreme Court’s discussion of this canon in Yellen v. Confederated Tribes of Che- halis Reservation, in which the Court said, “[t]he most gram- matical reading of a sentence in a vacuum does not always produce the best reading in context.” 594 U.S. 338, 359 (2021).
Kinsey relies on the Supreme Court’s discussion of this canon in Yellen v. Confederated Tribes of Che- halis Reservation, in which the Court said, “[t]he most gram- matical reading of a sentence in a vacuum does not always produce the best reading in context.” 594 U.S. 338, 359 (2021).
green
Apache Stronghold v. USA (2024)
See Yellen v. Confederated Tribes of Chehalis Rsrv., 141 S. Ct. 2434, 2445 (2021) (“Ordinarily . . . this Court reads statutory language as a term of art only when the language was used in that way at the time of the statute’s adoption.”).
“Ordinarily . . . this Court reads statutory language as a term of art only when the language was used in that way at the time of the statute’s adoption.”
green
Apache Stronghold v. USA (2024)
See Yellen v. Confederated Tribes of Chehalis Rsrv., 141 S. Ct. 2434 , 2445 (2021) (“Ordinarily . . . this Court reads statutory language as a term of art only when the language was used in that way at the time of the statute’s adoption.”).
“Ordinarily . . . this Court reads statutory language as a term of art only when the language was used in that way at the time of the statute’s adoption.”
green
Apache Stronghold v. USA (2024)
See Yellen v. Confederated Tribes of Chehalis Rsrv., 141 S. Ct. 2434 , 2445 (2021) (“Ordinarily . . . this Court reads statutory language as a term of art only when the language was used in that way at the time of the statute’s adoption.”).
“Ordinarily . . . this Court reads statutory language as a term of art only when the language was used in that way at the time of the statute’s adoption.”
But “Alaska is often the exception, not the rule.” Sturgeon v. Frost, 139 S. Ct. 1066, 1080 (2019) (citation omitted); Yellen v. Confederated Tribes of the Chehalis Rsrv., 141 S. Ct. 2434, 2438 (2021) (highlighting “the unique circumstances of Alaska”).
highlighting “the unique circumstances of Alaska”
But “Alaska is often the exception, not the rule.” Sturgeon v. Frost, 139 S. Ct. 1066, 1080 (2019) (citation omitted); Yellen v. Confederated Tribes of the Chehalis Rsrv., 141 S. Ct. 2434, 2438 (2021) (highlighting “the unique circumstances of Alaska”).
highlighting “the unique circumstances of Alaska”
green
Edin Madrid-Mancia v. Attorney General United States (2023)
Yellen v. Confederated Tribes of Chehalis Rsrv., 141 S. Ct. 2434, 2442 (2021).
green
William Burrell, Jr. v. Tom Staff (2023)
Yellen v. Confederated Tribes of Chehalis Rsrv., 141 S. Ct. 2434, 2442 (2021).
green
WA Alliance of Tech. Workers v. DHS (2022)
Yellen v. Confederated Tribes of Chehalis Rsrv., 141 S. Ct. 2434, 2448 (2021); see also, e.g., Republic of Sudan v. Harrison, 139 S. Ct. 1048, 1060 (2019).
green
JetPay v. United States (2022)
“The most grammatical reading of a sentence in a vacuum does not always produce the best reading in context.” Yellen v. Confederated Tribes of Chehalis Rsrv., 141 S. Ct. 2434, 2448 (2021).
(See Yellen v. Confederated Tribes of Chehalis Reservation (2021) 594 U.S. 338, 344 (Confederated Tribes of Chehalis).) Congress recognized “the obligation of the United States to respond to the strong expression of the Indian people for self-determination by assuring maximum Indian participation in the direction of . . .
(See Yellen v. Confederated Tribes of Chehalis Reservation (2021) 594 U.S. 338, 344 (Confederated Tribes of Chehalis).) Congress recognized “the obligation of the United States to respond to the strong expression of the Indian people for self-determination by assuring maximum Indian participation in the direction of . . .
green
Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Becerra (2024)
The commonality of “same drug” Third, Jazz contends that “same drug” is “‘too common and context dependent’ a phrase to assume that it bears the agency’s ‘loaded meaning wherever it appears.’” Jazz’s Opp’n at 16 (quoting Yellen v. Confederated Tribes of Chehalis Rsrv., 141 S. Ct. 2434, 2445 (2021)).
green
Hannah v. Koman Holdings, LLC (2024)
Yellen v. Confederated Tribes of Chehalis Rsrv., 594 U.S. 338, 339 (2021).
green
Bruckner Truck Sales, Inc. v. Guzman (2023)
“The most grammatical reading of a sentence in a vacuum does not always produce the best reading in context.” Yellen v. Confederated Tribes of Chehalis Rsrv., 141 S. Ct. 2434, 2448 (2021).
green
United States v. Panayiotou (2023)
Cir. Jan. 10, 2023); see also Yellen v. Confederated Tribes of Chehalis Rsrv., 141 S. Ct. 2434, 2448 (2021) (“[T]he most grammatical reading of a sentence in a vacuum does not always produce the best reading in context.”).
“[T]he most grammatical reading of a sentence in a vacuum does not always produce the best reading in context.”
green
Cully Corporation v. United States (2022)
In its past cases “address[ing] the unique circumstances of Alaska and its indigenous population,” the Supreme Court has repeatedly recognized “[t]he ‘simple truth’ . . . is that ‘Alaska is often the exception, not the rule.’” Yellen v. Confederated Tribes of Chehalis Rsrv., 141 S.Ct. 2434, 2438 (2021) (quoting Sturgeon v. Frost, 577 U.S. at 440 ).
quoting Sturgeon v. Frost, 577 U.S. at 440
green
Cully Corporation v. United States (2022)
In its past cases “address[ing] the unique circumstances of Alaska and its indigenous population,” the Supreme Court has repeatedly recognized “[t]he ‘simple truth’ . . . is that ‘Alaska is often the exception, not the rule.’” Yellen v. Confederated Tribes of Chehalis Rsrv., 141 S.Ct. 2434, 2438 (2021) (quoting Sturgeon v. Frost, 577 U.S. at 440 ).
quoting Sturgeon v. Frost, 577 U.S. at 440
green
White Mountain Apache Tribe v. United States (2021)
See 25 U.S.C. § 5302 (a); Yellen v. Confederated Tribes of Chehalis Rsrv., 141 S. Ct. 2434, 2439 (2021) (describing ISDA as “decentraliz[ing] the provision of federal Indian benefits away from the Federal Government and toward Native American . . . organizations”).
describing ISDA as “decentraliz[ing] the provision of federal Indian benefits away from the Federal Government and toward Native American . . . organizations”
As a result, when it comes to federal-Indian relations, “Alaska is often the exception, not the rule.” Yellen v. Confederated Tribes of the Chehalis Rsrv., 141 S. Ct. 2434, 2438 (2021) (quoting Sturgeon v. Frost, 577 U.S. 424, 440 (2016)).
quoting Sturgeon v. Frost, 577 U.S. 424, 440 (2016)
green
Mullin v. Doe (2026)
See Yellen v. Confederated Tribes of Chehalis Reservation, 594 U. S. 338, 353 .
green
Brown v. United States (2024)
See Yellen v. Confederated Tribes of Chehalis Reservation, 594 U. S. 338 , 344–348 (2021); Astrue v. Capato, 566 U. S. 541 , 547–549 (2012); Carachuri-Rosendo v. Holder, 560 U. S. 563 , 566–570 (2010); Holder v. Humanitarian Law Project, 561 U. S. 1 , 8–9 (2010).
green
Brown v. United States Revisions: 5/28/24 (2024)
See Yellen v. Confederated Tribes of Chehalis Reservation, 594 U. S. 338 , 344–348 (2021); Astrue v. Capato, 566 U. S. 541 , 547–549 (2012); Carachuri-Rosendo v. Holder, 560 U. S. 563 , 566–570 (2010); Holder v. Humanitarian Law Project, 561 U. S. 1 , 8–9 (2010).
green
Brown v. United States (2024)
See Yellen v. Confederated Tr ibes of Chehalis Reservation, 594 U. S. 338 , 344–348 (2021); Astrue v. Capato, 566 U. S. 541 , 547–549 (2012); Carachuri-Rosendo v. Holder, 560 U. S. 563 , 566–570 (2010); Holder v. Humanitarian Law Project, 561 U. S. 1 , 8–9 (2010).
green
City of Salisbury, North Carolina v. FERC (2022)
See id.; see also Yellen v. Confederated Tribes of the Chehalis Reservation, 141 S. Ct. 2434, 2455 (2021) (Gorsuch, J., dissenting).
Gorsuch, J., dissenting
green
Chegup v. Ute Indian Tribe of the Uintah (2022)
See, e.g., Timpanogos Tribe v. Conway, 286 F.3d 1195 , 1203–04 (10th Cir. 2002); see also Yellen v. Confederated Tribes of the Chehalis Rsrv., 141 S. Ct. 2434, 2458 (2021) (Gorsuch, J., dissenting) (noting that some “[Indian] groups may have federal rights secured by treaty, which may exist even if the tribe is no longer recognized”).
Gorsuch, J., dissenting
green
Winter v. NM Department of Workforce Solutions (2022)
The Court limits its discussion to the remaining Plaintiffs. 4 About the CARES ACT and the Consolidated Appropriations Act, U.S. Dep’t of the Treasury, https://home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/coronavirus/about-the-cares-act (last visited Aug. 16, 2022). local government.” 42 U.S.C. § 801 (a)(1); see also Yellen v. Confederated Tribes of Chehalis Rsrv., 141 S. Ct. 2434, 2453 (2021) (Gorsuch, J., dissenting) (observing that the CARES Act “directed trillions of dollars to vario…
Gorsuch, J., dissenting
green
Shawnee Tribe v. Yellen (2022)
See Yellen v. Confederated Tribes of Chehalis Rsrv., 141 S. Ct. 2434 (2021).