42 U.S.C. § 801
DEFINITIONS.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 43
cases (21 in the last 5 years), 1937–2025 · leading case: Yellen v. Confederated Tribes of Chehalis Reservation, 594 U.S. 338 (2021).
Yellen v. Confederated Tribes of Chehalis Reservation, 594 U.S. 338 (2021). “502 , 42 U. S. C. §801 (a)(2)(B). Under the CARES Act, a “Tribal govern- ment” is the “recognized governing body of an Indian tribe” as defined in the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act (ISDA).”
Shawnee Tribe v. Steven Mnuchin, 984 F.3d 94 (D.C. Cir. 2021). “Title V of the CARES Act appropriated $150 billion “for making payments to States, Tribal governments, and units of local government,” 42 U.S.C. § 801 (a)(1), for “necessary expenditures incurred due to the public health emergency with respect to [COVID-19],” id.”
In Re Interrogatories Submitted by the Gen. Assembly on House Bill 04-1098, 88 P.3d 1196 (Colo. 2004). “Moneys granted by the federal government to Colorado for the support of general or essential state government services, such as those allocated under the federal Jobs and Growth Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2003 (the "Jobs Act" or the "Act"), 42 U.S.C. § 801 et seq. (2004),…”
Confederated Tribes v. Steven Mnuchin, 976 F.3d 15 (D.C. Cir. 2020). “” 42 U.S.C. § 801 (a)(1). These payments cover “necessary expenditures incurred due to the public health emergency.”
Layla Story-Bernardo v. Gov't of Guam, Lourdes A. Leon Guerrero, 2023 Guam 27 (Guam 2023). “See 42 U.S.C.A. § 801 (a) (Westlaw current through Pub.”
Csx Transp., Inc. v. City of Plymouth, Michigan, 86 F.3d 626 (6th Cir. 1996). “CSXT claims that this ordinance: (1) is expressly preempted by the FRSA, (2) places an unconstitutional burden on interstate commerce in violation of the Commerce Clause, and (3) discriminatorily taxes CSXT in violation of the Railroad Revitalization and Regulatory Reform Act…”
Baker-Chaput v. Cammett, 406 F. Supp. 1134 (D.N.H. 1976). “and 42 U.S.C. § 801 et seq., and the "general assistance program," NH RSA 165:1.”
Floretta LAND, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Sec'y OF HEALTH & HUMAN Servs., Defendant-Appellee, 814 F.2d 241 (6th Cir. 1986). “Section 402(e) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 801 -1897f (1982) (“Act”), provides disability benefits to a widow if (1) she is a widow of a wage earner who died fully insured; (2) she is between the ages of fifty and sixty; (3) she is disabled; and (4) her disability…”
City of Camden v. Plotkin, 466 F. Supp. 44 (D.N.J. 1978). “See 42 U.S.C. § 801 et seq. We know that census figures are certified by defendants to the Secretary and do play a role in CETA fund allocation, as defendants concede at page 4 of their Supplemental Brief in support of this motion.”
Texas Instruments, Inc. v. United States, 407 F. Supp. 1326 (N.D. Tex. 1976). “1969 Accrued liability of the plan $47,967,542 $57,308,919 Assets of the plan 72,208,577 83,524,000 Unfunded past services costs (24,241,035) (26,215,081) Ján. 1,1968 Jan.”
Roseanne Beckert v. Our Lady of Angels Apts., Inc., 192 F.3d 601 (6th Cir. 1999). “§ 1701q continues to govern the provision of financial assistance to sponsors of housing for the elderly, the Cranston-Gonzalez Act, 42 U.S.C. § 801 , now governs the provision of financial assistance to sponsors of housing for the handicapped.”
Smith v. City of Franklin, 987 A.2d 127 (N.H. 2010). “We next turn to the question of whether the Medicaid-APTD program is synonymous with the NH-APTD financial assistance program for the purpose of evaluating the plaintiff’s eligibility for the requested local assistance.”
— 42 U.S.C. § 801(d) — 1 case
Layla Story-Bernardo v. Gov't of Guam, Lourdes A. Leon Guerrero, 2023 Guam 27 (Guam 2023). “See 42 U.S.C.A. § 801 (a) (Westlaw current through Pub.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.