Jackson v. State (1858)
green
· 25 citation events
across 12 courts.
Showing the 4 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1907 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
190719662026
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
green
Charles Ben Howell v. State Bar of Texas (1988)
In applying the century-old rules illustrated by the above statutes, Texas courts have held that it is only the “official conduct” of lawyers with which they are concerned, and disbarment cannot be predicated upon opprobrious or abusive epithets directed by a lawyer to a judge in vacation, Jackson v. The State, 21 Tex. 668, 674 (1858), or upon an out-of-court expressed hope that Germany would win World War I, Lotto v. State, 208 S.W. 563 (Tex.Civ.App.1919).
green
Eichelberger v. Eichelberger (1979)
NOTES [1] Texas courts have recognized or utilized their inherent powers in the following instances: to change, set aside or otherwise control their judgments, A. F. Jones & Sons v. Republic Supply Co., 151 Tex. 90 , 246 S.W.2d 853 (1952); Nevitt v. Wilson, 116 Tex. 29 , 285 S.W. 1079 (1926); Townes v. Lattimore, 114 Tex. 511 , 272 S.W. 435 (1925); In re House Bill 537, 113 Tex. 367 , 256 S.W. 573 (1923); Coleman v. Zapp, 105 Tex. 491 , 151 S.W. 1040, 1041 (1912); Cohen v. M…
See id.
green
Polk v. State Bar of Texas (1974)
See, Jackson v. State, 21 Tex. 668 (1858), where it was held that an attorney’s abusive criticism of a judge was not professional misconduct since the criticism was made outside the scope of his official conduct as an attorney.