Cohen v. State (1907)
green
· 32 citation events
across 2 courts.
Showing the 4 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1908 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
190819672026
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
green
Hodges v. State (1959)
In Cohen v. State, 2 Ga. App. 689, 692 ( 59 S. E. 4 ), it was held that the exception to prevent the bar of the statute of limitations must be set out in the indictment in the language used in the Penal Code.
green
Davis v. State (1944)
Morrow v. State, 62 Ga. App. 718 ( 9 S. E. 2d, 699 ) ; Cohen v. State, 2 Ga. App. 689, 693 ( 59 S. E. 4 ) ; Springer v. State, 121 Ga. 155 ( 48 S. E. 907 ) ; Tipton v. State, 119 Ga. 304 ( 46 S. E. 436 ) ; Taylor v. State, 5 Ga. App. 237 (2) ( 62 S. E. 1048 ).
green
Kiles v. State (1934)
There is in this ruling no conflict with the established rule that the State must prove every material fact essential to show the guilt of him who is accused of crime; for, as we have stated, this 'is no part of the crime, but merely an exception to a rule in his favor.” Cohen v. State, 2 Ga. App. 689, 694 ( 59 S. E. 4 ).
green
Taylor v. State (1931)
In Cohen v. State, 2 Ga. App. 689, 694 ( 59 S. E. 4 ), this court said: “Where it is stated that the indictment was not brought within the period of time allowed by Penal Code, § 30, because the offense of the offender was unknown, the State makes a prima facie case and shifts the burden of proof on the defendant when it is shown that the prosecutor or the party most interested did not know the offense (or the offender, as the case may be).