Caldwell v. City of Elwood, Indiana (1992)
green
· 115 citation events
across 15 courts.
Showing the 50 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1992 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
199220092026
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
green
Michael Alan Gadsby v. Norwalk Furniture Corporation (1996)
Caldwell v. City of Elwood, 959 F.2d 670, 671 (7th Cir.1992).
A. For a First Amendment retaliation claim to survive a judgment on the pleadings, we have held that “the facts alleged in the complaint must show that (1) the speech in which the plaintiffs engaged was constitutionally protected under the circumstances, and (2) the defendants retaliated against them because of it.” Gustafson, 117 F.3d at 1018 (citing Caldwell v. City of Elwood, 959 F.2d 670, 672 (7th Cir.1992)).
green
Delgado, Octavio v. Jones, Arthur L. (2002)
A. For a First Amendment retaliation claim to survive a judgment on the pleadings, we have held that "the facts alleged in the complaint must show that (1) the speech in which the plaintiffs engaged was constitutionally protected under the circumstances, and (2) the defendants retaliated against them because of it." Gustafson, 117 F.3d at 1018 (citing Caldwell v. City of Elwood, 959 F.2d 670, 672 (7th Cir. 1992)).
See, e.g., Gustafson v. Jones, 117 F.3d 1015, 1021 (7th Cir.1997); Caldwell v. City of Elwood, 959 F.2d 670, 672 (7th Cir.1992).
See, e.g., Gustafson v. Jones, 117 F.3d 1015, 1021 (7th Cir.1997); Caldwell v. City of Elwood, 959 F.2d 670, 672 (7th Cir.1992).
green
Gustafson v. Jones (1997)
Caldwell v. City of Elwood, Ind., 959 F.2d 670, 672 (7th Cir.1992), quoting Barkoo v. Melby, 901 F.2d 613, 617 (7th Cir.1990).
green
Gustafson v. Jones (1997)
Caldwell v. City of Elwood, Ind., 959 F.2d 670, 672 (7th Cir.1992), quoting Barkoo v. Melby, 901 F.2d 613, 617 (7th Cir.1990).
green
Rudolph Lucien v. Howard A. Peters III (1997)
The district court 3 dismissed three claims for failure to state a claim, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) (prison overcrowding, excessive noise, and gang control), and the court entered summary judgment in favor of defendants as to the two remaining claims (racial discrimination in cell assignments, and exposure to environmental tobacco smoke). 4 Standard of Review 2 We review a dismissal under Rule 12(b)(6) de novo, Caldwell v. City of Elwood, 959 F.2d 670, 671 (7th Cir.1…
green
In Re Healthcare Compare Corp. Securities Litigation (1996)
Caldwell v. City of Elwood, 959 F.2d 670, 671 (7th Cir.1992).
green
Moss v. Healthcare Compare Corp. (1996)
Caldwell v. City of Elwood, 959 F.2d 670, 671 (7th Cir.1992).
green
John Goodluck v. City of Chicago (1995)
Caldwell v. City of Elwood, 959 F.2d 670, 671 (7th Cir.1992). 6 Goodluck argues that the district court erroneously dismissed his claims because the parties' diverse citizenship entitles him to federal-court adjudication of his alleged property rights.
green
Scott Wexler v. City of Chicago, Caesar Blanco, Individually and as District Officer, Cortez Trotter, Individ… (1994)
Caldwell v. City of Elwood, 959 F.2d 670, 671 (7th Cir.1992).
green
Hondo, Inc. v. Sterling (1994)
Caldwell v. City of Elwood, 959 F.2d 670, 671 (7th Cir.1992).
green
Hondo, Inc. v. Sterling (1994)
Caldwell v. City of Elwood, 959 F.2d 670, 671 (7th Cir.1992).
green
Claire Addams v. City of Chicago (1994)
Caldwell v. City of Elwood, Ind., 959 F.2d 670, 671 (7th Cir.1992).
green
Northern Assurance Co. of America v. Summers (1994)
Caldwell v. City of Elwood, Inc., 959 F.2d 670, 671 (7th Cir.1992).
green
Northern Assurance Company of America v. Summers (1994)
Caldwell v. City of Elwood, Inc., 959 F.2d 670, 671 (7th Cir.1992).
As an appellate court, we review the grant of a motion to dismiss de novo, Caldwell v. City of Elwood, 959 F.2d 670, 671 (7th Cir.1992), viewing all the facts alleged in the complaint, as well as any inferences reasonably drawn from them, in a light most favorable to the plaintiff.
green
Charles Arnhold v. Kenneth McGinnis (1993)
Id.; Caldwell v. City of Elwood, 959 F.2d 670, 671 (7th Cir.1992).
green
Quentin Kelly, Jerry Smith, Ray B. Hill v. City of Chicago, an Illinois Municipal Corporation, Michael Collin… (1993)
Caldwell v. City of Elwood, 959 F.2d 670, 671 (7th Cir.1992).
green
Canada v. Hall (2019)
See, e.g., Grieveson v. Anderson, 538 F.3d 763, 774 (7th Cir. 2008) (holding that four incidents involving the plaintiff did not establish a widespread unconstitutional practice sufficient to survive summary judgment); Caldwell v. City of Elwood, 959 F.2d 670, 673 (7th Cir. 1992) (concluding that a single alleged incident of First Amendment retaliation was insufficient to establish a municipal practice capable of surviving a motion to dismiss).
concluding that a single alleged incident of First Amendment retaliation was insufficient to establish a municipal practice capable of surviving a motion to dismiss
green
Glade ex rel. Lundskow v. United States (2011)
Caldwell v. City of Elwood, 959 F.2d 670, 671 (7th Cir.1992).
green
Padron v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (2011)
Caldwell v. City of Elwood, 959 F.2d 670, 671 (7th Cir.1992).
green
Simonian v. Weber-Stephen Products Co. (2011)
Caldwell v. City of Elwood, 959 F.2d 670, 671 (7th Cir.1992).
Caldwell v. City of Elwood, 959 F.2d 670, 671 (7th Cir.1992).
green
Amerigas Propane, L.P. v. BP America, Inc. (2010)
Caldwell v. City of Elwood, 959 F.2d 670, 671 (7th Cir.1992).
green
Swanson v. Citi (2009)
Caldwell v. City of Elwood, 959 F.2d 670, 671 (7th Cir.1992).
green
S & L Enterprises I, LLC v. Eisaman (Eisaman) (2008)
Caldwell v. City of Elwood, Ind., 959 F.2d 670, 671-72 (7th Cir.1992)(citing Mosley v. Klincar, 947 F.2d 1388, 1339 (7th Cir.1991)).
green
Meer v. Graham (2007)
Caldwell v. City of Elwood, 959 F.2d 670, 672 (7th Cir.1992) (citation omitted).
green
Young v. Schmucker (In Re Schmucker) (2007)
Caldwell v. City of Elwood, Ind., 959 F.2d 670, 671-72 (7th Cir.1992)(citing Mosley v. Klincar, 947 F.2d 1338, 1339 (7th Cir.1991)).
green
Cobbs v. Sheahan (2004)
Caldwell v. City of Elwood, 959 F.2d 670, 672 (7th Cir.1992).
green
Ellis v. City of Chicago (2003)
Caldwell v. City of Elwood, Ind., 959 F.2d 670, 672 (7th Cir.1992) (citations omitted).
green
Love v. City of Chicago Board of Education (1998)
See Gustafson, 117 F.3d at 1018-19 ; Caldwell v. City of Elwood, 959 F.2d 670, 672 (7th Cir.1992).
green
Zisis v. St. Joseph Tp. of Allen County (1997)
Courts have routinely held that isolated incidents of alleged misconduct by a governmental employee or governmental official, are insufficient, as a matter of law, to raise an inference as to the existence of a custom for purposes of establishing municipal liability.” Defendants’ Memorandum, pp. 21-22 (citing Caldwell v. City of Elwood, Indiana, 959 F.2d 670, 673 (7th Cir.1992) and Henry v. Farmer City State Bank, 808 F.2d 1228, 1237 (7th Cir.1986)).
green
Sarantakis v. Village of Winthrop Harbor (1997)
Caldwell v. City of Elwood, 959 F.2d 670, 673 (7th Cir.1992).
green
Wright v. Butts (1996)
Caldwell v. City of Elwood, 959 F.2d 670, 672 (7th Cir.1992) (quoting Brownlee v. Conine, 957 F.2d 353, 354 (7th Cir.1992)) (holding that “[a] civil rights complaint must outline a vio *1362 lation of the constitution or a federal statute ‘and connect the violation to the named defendants’ ”).
green
Lionheart Partners, Inc. v. M-Wave, Inc. (1996)
Caldwell v. City of Elwood, 959 F.2d 670, 671 (7th Cir.1992).
green
Arrington v. Dickerson (1996)
Caldwell v. City of Elwood, 959 F.2d 670, 672 (7th Cir.1992) (quoting Brownlee v. Conine, 957 F.2d 353, 354 (7th Cir.1992) (holding that “[a] civil rights complaint must outline a violation of the constitution or a federal statute ‘and connect the violation to the named defendants’ ”).) In order to bridge the gap between the protected speech and the denial of the plaintiffs retail liquor license, the court must assume facts not set forth in the complaint.
green
Dandino v. Tieri (1995)
Since we must accept the well-pleaded allegations of Dandino’s complaint on this motion to dismiss, Caldwell v. City of Elwood, 959 F.2d 670, 672 (7th Cir.1992), there is no question that Dandino can meet the first two prongs of the test.
green
Arrington v. Dickerson (1995)
The court also finds persuasive the Seventh Circuit’s reasoning that “[a] civil rights complaint must outline a violation of the constitution or a federal statute and connect the violation to the ‘named defendants.’ ” Caldwell v. City of Elwood, 959 F.2d 670, 672 (7th Cir.1992) (quoting Brownlee v. Conine, 957 F.2d 353, 354 (7th Cir.1992)); see also Branch v. Tunnell, 937 F.2d 1382, 1386 (9th Cir.1991), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 2704 , 129 L.Ed.2d 832 (1994) (Where s…
green
Falk v. Cook County Sheriff's Office (1995)
Caldwell v. City of Elwood, Indiana, 959 F.2d 670, 672 (7th Cir.1992) (“discharge is not the only retaliatory act for [constitutionally protected] speech that is actionable under section 1983”); Auriemma v. Rice, 910 F.2d 1449, 1459 (7th Cir.1990).
green
Abbott Laboratories v. Zenith Laboratories, Inc. (1995)
Caldwell v. City of Elwood, Ind., 959 F.2d 670, 671 (7th Cir.1992) (citing Mosley v. Minear, 947 F.2d 1338, 1339 (7th Cir.1991).
green
McQuerry v. American Medical Systems, Inc. (1995)
In ruling on a motion to dismiss, "[w]e view all of the facts alleged in the complaint, as well as any inferences reasonably drawn from them, in the light most favorable to the plaintiff." Caldwell v. City of Elwood, 959 F.2d 670, 671 (7th Cir.1992).
green
Libbra v. City of Litchfield, Ill. (1995)
Accordingly, it seems clear that the Libbras are burdened with the task of convincing the Court that the content of their signs qualifies as protected speech and thus enjoys Constitutional protection. 4 See Caldwell v. City of Elwood, 959 F.2d 670, 672 (7th Cir.1992) (In the context of a public employee alleging that he was retaliated against for exercising his First Amendment guarantee of free speech, the public employee must establish “that the speech [he] 'engaged in was …
green
Rojicek v. Community Consolidated School District 15 (1995)
Caldwell v. City of Elwood, Ind., 959 F.2d 670, 672 (7th Cir. 1992), citing Barkoo v. Melby, 901 F.2d 613, 617 (7th Cir.1990).
In ruling on a motion to dismiss, "[w]e view all of the facts alleged in the complaint, as well as any inferences reasonably drawn from them, in the light most favorable to the plaintiff.” Caldwell v. City of Elwood, 959 F.2d 670, 671 (7th Cir.1992).
Caldwell v. City of Elwood, Ind., 959 F.2d 670, 671 (7th Cir.1992), citing Mosley v. Klincar, *1094 947 F.2d 1338, 1339 (7th Cir.1991).
green
Parish v. Pahs (1995)
Caldwell v. City of Elwood, Indiana, 959 F.2d 670, 672 (7th Cir.1992). 2 As for the first element, whether a public employee’s speech has protected status is a question of law determined by this court.
green
Williams v. Hutchens (1994)
Caldwell v. City of Elwood, 959 F.2d 670, 672 (7th Cir.1992) (quoting Mosley v. Klincar, 947 F.2d 1338, 1339 (7th Cir.1991)).
green
Morris v. State of Kan. Dept. of Revenue (1994)
Caldwell v. City of Elwood, Ind., 959 F.2d 670, 672 (7th Cir.1992).