Bishop v. Pecanic (1998)
green
· 11 citation events
across 1 courts.
Showing the 4 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
green
Ida v. Leach (2016)
See A.R.S. § 12-2501(C); see also Bishop v. Pecanic, 193 Ariz. 524, 528, ¶ 14 (App. 1998) (“UCATA did not grant the intentional tortfeasor the right of contribution.”).
“UCATA did not grant the intentional tortfeasor the right of contribution.”
green
McEvoy v. Aerotek, Inc. (2001)
Bishop v. Pecanic, 193 Ariz. 524, 530, ¶ 26 , 975 P.2d 114, 120 (App.1998); Hooper v. Truly Nolen of America, Inc., 171 Ariz. 692, 695 , 832 P.2d 709, 712 (App.1992).
green
Eick v. Delta (2015)
Decision of the Court against Eick.” Although a “party does not enjoy derivative success simply because he is lined up on the same side as a prevailing party,” Bishop v. Pecanic, 193 Ariz. 524, 531, ¶ 27 (App. 1998), we are not dealing here with simple positional alignment.
green
Jamerson v. Quintero (2013)
See Bishop v. Pecanic, 193 Ariz. 524 , 975 P.2d 114 (App.1998) (applying § 12-2504 to stipulated dismissal of intentional tort claims against joint tortfeasors).