How cited: Bishop v. Pecanic · Go Syfert

Bishop v. Pecanic (1998)

green · 11 citation events across 1 courts. Showing the 4 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
green Ida v. Leach (2016)
Quote Authority · Ariz. Ct. App. · signal: see also · 4 citations in this opinion
See A.R.S. § 12-2501(C); see also Bishop v. Pecanic, 193 Ariz. 524, 528, ¶ 14 (App. 1998) (“UCATA did not grant the intentional tortfeasor the right of contribution.”).
“UCATA did not grant the intentional tortfeasor the right of contribution.”
Rule Authority · Ariz. Ct. App. · 4 citations in this opinion
Bishop v. Pecanic, 193 Ariz. 524, 530, ¶ 26 , 975 P.2d 114, 120 (App.1998); Hooper v. Truly Nolen of America, Inc., 171 Ariz. 692, 695 , 832 P.2d 709, 712 (App.1992).
green Eick v. Delta (2015)
Rule Authority · Ariz. Ct. App.
Decision of the Court against Eick.” Although a “party does not enjoy derivative success simply because he is lined up on the same side as a prevailing party,” Bishop v. Pecanic, 193 Ariz. 524, 531, ¶ 27 (App. 1998), we are not dealing here with simple positional alignment.
green Jamerson v. Quintero (2013)
Cited · Ariz. Ct. App. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See Bishop v. Pecanic, 193 Ariz. 524 , 975 P.2d 114 (App.1998) (applying § 12-2504 to stipulated dismissal of intentional tort claims against joint tortfeasors).