United States v. Lyndell N. (1997)

green · 8 citation events across 4 courts. Showing the 4 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).

All Green 4

Sort: By significance · Most recent

green United States v. Juvenile Male (2003)

Rule Authority · 9th Cir.

In United States v. Lyndell N., 124 F.3d 1170, 1171-72 (9th Cir.1997), we did distinguish Doe on the basis of the amendments to § 5032.

green Free Spirit Organics, NAC v. San Joaquin County Board of Supervisors (2022)

Rule Authority · E.D. Cal.

A violation of the ex post facto clause 2 occurs only when 1) the law is “retrospective, that is, it must apply to events occurring before its 3 enactment”; and 2) the law “disadvantage[s] the offender affected by it.” United States v. Lyndell 4 N., 124 F.3d 1170, 1172 (9th Cir. 1997) (citations omitted). 5 Plaintiffs claim the Ordinance is an ex post facto law because “[p]laintiffs’ hemp 6 cultivation and growing operation was already underway at the time of the enactment o…

citations omitted

green Western Aggregates, Inc. v. County of Yuba (2002)

Rule Authority · Cal. Ct. App.

(U.S. v. Lyndell N. (9th Cir. 1997) 124 F.3d 1170, 1172 [federal laws become operative when passed].) As to those portions of the road that ran over the Brannan-O’Brien parcels we have discussed, those private landowners impliedly dedicated the land for continued use of the road (which had run over their lands since long before their ownership).

green Jordan v. Hawk (2001)

Cited · 10th Cir. · signal: see

See United States v. Lyndell N., 124 F.3d 1170, 1172 (9th Cir.1997); VCCLEA, Pub.L. 103-122, 108 Stat. 1825, 1828.