Negron v. State (2019)

green · 9 citation events across 1 courts. Showing the 8 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).

All Green 8

Sort: By significance · Most recent

green Robert Everett Allen v. State of Florida (2025)

Rule Authority · Fla. Dist. Ct. App.

While no statutory minimum exists for an award of investigative costs, such costs must be “supported by competent substantial evidence.” Icon v. State, 322 So. 3d 117 , 119 (Fla. 4th DCA 2021) (quoting Negron v. State, 266 So. 3d 1266, 1267 (Fla. 5th DCA 2019)).

green TYRONE G. JENKINS, JR. v. STATE OF FLORIDA (2022)

Rule Authority · Fla. Dist. Ct. App.

“This award must simply ‘be supported by competent substantial evidence.’” Id. (quoting Negron v. State, 266 So. 3d 1266, 1267 (Fla. 5th DCA 2019)); see also Jackson v. State, 137 So. 3d 470, 472 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014) (“[T]he court cannot impose such investigative costs without evidence of the amount of the costs.”).

green ROY LEE ICON v. STATE OF FLORIDA (2021)

Rule Authority · Fla. Dist. Ct. App.

This award must simply “be supported by competent substantial evidence.” Negron v. State, 266 So. 3d 1266, 1267 (Fla. 5th DCA 2019).

green Robert Joseph Goldsmith v. State of Florida (2024)

Cited (see also) · Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · signal: see, e.g.

See, e.g., Negron v. State, 266 So. 3d 1266, 1267 (Fla. 5th DCA 2019).

green ROYTEZ LEONARD TAYLOR v. STATE OF FLORIDA (2022)

Cited (see also) · Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · signal: see, e.g.

See, e.g., Negron v. State, 266 So. 3d 1266, 1267 (Fla. 5th DCA 2019). 3 Furthermore, section 938.27(1), Florida Statutes (2021), provides a defendant must pay investigation costs only if the agency that incurs that cost requests it.

green BRIAN INGALLS v. STATE OF FLORIDA (2020)

Cited · Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · signal: see

See Negron v. State, 266 So. 3d 1266, 1267 (Fla. 5th DCA 2019); Phillips v. State, 942 So. 2d 1042, 1044 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006).

green Gissendanner v. State (2019)

Cited · Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · signal: see

See Negron v. State , 266 So.3d 1266 , 2019 WL 1302366 (Fla. 5th DCA Mar. 22, 2019) (remanding for new hearing where award of investigative costs was not supported by competent, substantial evidence); see also Williams v. State , 850 So. 2d 627 , 628 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003) (reversing for new restitution hearing where award was based solely on contested hearsay evidence (citing Sherwood v. State , 832 So. 2d 926 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002) )). *214 AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; and …

remanding for new hearing where award of investigative costs was not supported by competent, substantial evidence

green Gissendanner v. State (2019)

Cited · Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · signal: see

remanding for new hearing where award of investigative costs was not supported by competent, substantial evidence