Cluster 778564
green
· 28 citation events
across 3 courts.
Showing the 5 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
green
United States v. Enriquez (2025)
See United States v. Feingold, 454 F.3d 1001, 1006, 1012 (9th Cir. 2006); United States v. King, 587 F.2d 956 , 965–66 (9th Cir. 1978) (“lack of authorization is an element of” Section 841); United States v. Kim, 298 F.3d 746, 750 (9th Cir. 2002) (confirming that King requires the government to plead “except as authorized” as an element in a Section 841 indictment).
confirming that King requires the government to plead “except as authorized” as an element in a Section 841 indictment
green
United States v. Wilson (2002)
In United States v. Kim, 298 F.3d 746, at 749 (9th Cir.2002), the court examined a motion to dismiss by two defendants claiming that the same § 3731 render versus Rule 4(b) entry issue made the government’s notice of appeal in that case untimely.
green
United States v. Eric Kalb (2018)
See United States v. Kim , 298 F.3d 746 , 749 (9th Cir. 2002), amended by 317 F.3d 917 (9th Cir. 2003) ; United States v. Cook , 599 F.3d 1208 , 1212 (10th Cir. 2010).
green
United States v. Barekzai (2009)
See United States v. Kim, 317 F.3d 917, 918 (9th Cir.2003), amending 298 F.3d 746 (9th Cir.2002).
green
United States v. Barekzai (2009)
See United States v. Kim, 317 F.3d 917, 918 (9th Cir.2003), amending 298 F.3d 746 (9th Cir.2002).