Cluster 784747 (2004)

green · 23 citation events across 7 courts. Showing the 11 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).

All Green 11

Treatment trajectory · 2004 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then

200420152026

Sort: By significance · Most recent

green Sandwich Isles Communications, Inc. v. Hawaiian Telcom Inc. (2024)

Rule Authority · 9th Cir.

Bunyan v. United States (In re Bunyan), 354 F.3d 1149, 1150 (9th Cir. 2004).

green Gugliuzza v. Federal Trade Commission (2017)

Rule Authority · 9th Cir.

We have jurisdiction to determine our jurisdiction, Bunyan v. United States (In re Bunyan), 354 F.3d 1149, 1152 (9th Cir. 2004), and consider the question de novo, Silver Sage Partners, Ltd. v. City of Desert Hot Springs (In re City of Desert Hot Springs), 339 F.3d 782, 787 (9th Cir. 2003).

green In Re Frank Salazar in Re Margaret Salazar, Debtors, Frank Salazar Margaret Salazar v. Kathleen A. McDonald A… (2005)

Rule Authority · 9th Cir.

Bunyan v. United States (In re Bunyan), 354 F.3d 1149, 1150 (9th Cir. 2004).

green Salazar v. Flores (2005)

Rule Authority · 9th Cir.

Bunyan v. United States (In re Bunyan), 354 F.3d 1149, 1150 (9th Cir. 2004).

green In Re: Jeremy Daniel Kintner (2022)

Quote Authority · C.D. Cal. · signal: cf.

See City Vending of Muskogee, Inc., 898 F.2d at 124-25 (finding § 505(a)(2)(A) stripped the bankruptcy court of jurisdiction “[a]lthough the merits of plaintiff’s claims were never addressed” and the tax authority “specifically ruled that, as an administrative agency, it lacked the authority to determine plaintiff’s constitutional claims.”); cf. Bunyan v. United States (In re Buyan), 354 F.3d 1149 , 1153 (9th Cir. 2004) (“At least in tax court, therefore, a claim need not ha…

“At least in tax court, therefore, a claim need not have been actually litigated to have been ‘contested’ for purposes of bankruptcy court jurisdiction.”

green Ingram v. Burchard (2012)

Rule Authority · N.D. Cal.

Bunyan v. United States (“In re Bunyan”) 354 F.3d 1149, 1150 (9th Cir.2004).

green In re: David C. Welsh and Sharon N. Welsh (2012)

Rule Authority · 9th Cir. BAP

Bunyan v. United 11 States (In re Bunyan), 354 F.3d 1149, 1150 (9th Cir. 2004); Shook 12 v. CBIC (In re Shook), 278 B.R. 815, 820 (9th Cir. BAP 2002). 13 DISCUSSION 14 1.

green State Bar of California v. Albert (2025)

Cited (see also) · 9th Cir. · signal: see also

See 28 U.S.C. § 158 (d); see also In re Bunyan, 354 F.3d 1149 , 1152 (9th Cir. 2004) (recognizing that “[a] federal court always has jurisdiction to determine its own jurisdiction”). ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument.

recognizing that “[a] federal court always has jurisdiction to determine its own jurisdiction”

green Central Valley AG Enterprises v. United States (2008)

Cited · 9th Cir. · signal: accord

Inc., 224 F.3d 235, 239-40 (3d Cir.2000); accord Bunyan v. United States (In re Bunyan), 354 F.3d 1149, 1151 (9th Cir.2004).

green Central Valley Ag v. United States (2008)

Cited · 9th Cir. · signal: accord

Inc., 224 F.3d 235, 239-40 (3d Cir. 2000); accord Bunyan v. United States (In re Bunyan), 354 F.3d 1149, 1151 (9th Cir. 2004). [2] Section 505(a) is also a statutory embodiment of tradi- tional principles of res judicata.

green Tcherevik v. Rybcomflot (2006)

Cited (see also) · signal: see, e.g.

See, e.g., In Re Bunyan, 354 F.3d 1149 , 1150 (9th Cir.2004). .

applying abuse of discretion review to 11 U.S.C. § 304