How cited: State v. Brocuglio · Go Syfert

State v. Brocuglio (2001)

red · 15 citation events across 5 courts. Showing the 3 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
yellow State v. Tapia (2018)
But See · N.M. · signal: but see · 2 citations in this opinion
See, e.g. , People v. Diamond , 77 Misc.2d 412 , 353 N.Y.S.2d 688 , 690-91 (1974) (impersonating a transit authority conductor was a new crime not tainted by illegal arrest); State v. Suppah , 358 Or. 565 , 369 P.3d 1108 , 1112 (2016) ( Suppah II ) (concluding a defendant's commission of new crime of providing deputy with false name and address sufficiently attenuated taint of illegal stop); State v. Earl , 2004 UT App 163 , ¶¶ 23-24, 92 P.3d 167 (holding that a defendant gi…
holding that a defendant's verbal utterances to the officers requesting that they leave his property or he would let his dog loose did not constitute a new, distinct crime
yellow State v. Tapia (2018)
But See · N.M. · signal: but see
See, e.g., People v. Diamond, 353 N.Y.S.2d 688, 690-91 (1974) (impersonating a transit authority conductor was a new crime not tainted by illegal arrest); State v. Suppah, 369 P.3d 1108, 1112 (Or. 2016) (Suppah II) (concluding a defendant’s commission of new crime of providing deputy with false name and address sufficiently attenuated taint of illegal stop); State v. Earl, 2004 UT App 163, ¶¶ 23-24 , 92 P.3d. 167 (holding that a defendant giving officer a false name and birt…
holding that a defendant’s verbal utterances to the officers requesting that they leave his property or he would let his dog loose did not constitute a new, distinct crime
green Edens v. Kennedy (2004)
Cited · 4th Cir. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See State v. Brocuglio, 64 Conn.App. 93 , 779 A.2d 793, 800 (2001) (holding that police violated Fourth Amendment by entering backyard enclosed by stockade fence posted with “No Trespassing” and “Keep Out” signs), aff'd, 264 Conn. 778 , 826 A.2d 145 (2003); State v. Ridgway, 57 Wash.App. 915 , 790 P.2d 1263, 1265 (1990) (holding that marijuana recovered from doorstep was subject to suppression because police observed marijuana only after walking around closed gate across dri…
holding that police violated Fourth Amendment by entering backyard enclosed by stockade fence posted with “No Trespassing” and “Keep Out” signs