Southern New England Telephone Co. v. Department of Public Utility Control (2001)
green
· 29 citation events
across 3 courts.
Showing the 4 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 2001 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
200120132026
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
Indeed, this court described the judicial gloss provided by Derwin as follows: "[I]n any matter brought before [the commission], there can never be a 'contested case' as defined by § 4-166 [4] because decisions of the commission are not final for purposes of the UAPA." Ahern v. State Employees Retirement Commission , supra, 48 Conn. App. at 485 , 710 A.2d 1366 ; see also Southern New England Telephone Co. v. Dept. of Public Utility Control , 64 Conn. App. 134 , 142, 779 A.2d…
"[r]econsideration for purposes of § 4-166 [5] (C) is limited to a decision that was final before reconsideration because it was made in a contested case"
green
Peruta v. Commissioner of Public Safety (2011)
See Southern New England Telephone Co. v. Dept. of Public Utility Control, 64 Conn. App. 134, 141 , 779 A.2d 817 (2001), appeal dismissed, 260 Conn. 180 , 799 A.2d 294 (2002).
green
Del Core v. Mohican Historic Housing Associates (2004)
See Southern New England Telephone Co. v. Dept. of Public Utility Control, 64 Conn. App. 134, 137 , 779 A.2d 817 (2001), appeal dismissed, 260 Conn. 180 , 799 A.2d 294 (2002).
See Southern New England Telephone Co. v. Department of Public Utility Control , 64 Conn. App. 134 , 139-43 , 779 A.2d 817 (2001), cert. dismissed, 260 Conn. 180 , ___ A.2d ___ (2002) (holding that General Statutes § 16-35 , which provides for appeals from the decisions of the department of public utility control "in accordance with the provisions of section 4-183 ," incorporates the "final decision" component of § 4-183 (a)).