United States v. Rafael Beltran-Arce (2005)

green · 16 citation events across 4 courts. Showing the 11 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).

All Green 11

Sort: By significance · Most recent

green United States v. Steven Davis (2017)

Rule Authority · 8th Cir.

See, e.g., United States v. Big Eagle, 702 F.3d 1125 , 1132 *1032 (8th Cir. 2013) (noting that a curative instruction is generally sufficient to remedy prejudice from improperly admitted evidence); United States v. Beltran-Arce, 415 F.3d 949, 953-54 (8th Cir. 2005) ("As we have oft stated, ‘less drastic measures such as a cautionary instruction are generally sufficient to alleviate prejudice flowing from improper testimony.’ ” (quoting United States v. Davidson, 122 F.3d 531…

"As we have oft stated, ‘less drastic measures such as a cautionary instruction are generally sufficient to alleviate prejudice flowing from improper testimony.’ ” (quoting United States v. Davidson, 122 F.3d 531, 538 (8th Cir. 1997))

green United States v. Kotula (2006)

Rule Authority · 6th Cir.

Contrast US v. Beltran-Arce, 415 F.3d 949, 953-54 (8th Cir.2005).

green United States v. Raul Munoz Lopez (2005)

Rule Authority · 8th Cir.

We will only remand for resentencing due to Booker error when the error satisfies the plain error test of United States v. Olano, 507 U.S. 725 , 113 S.Ct. 1770 , 123 L.Ed.2d *317 508 (1993). 3 United States v. Pirani, 406 F.3d 543, 549-50 (8th Cir.2005) (en banc), United States v. Beltran-Aree, 415 F.3d 949, 954-55 (8th Cir.2005) (holding that because the defendant failed to argue for an advisory application of the Guidelines, the Court reviews for plain error).

green United States v. Hashim Amin Cawthorn (2005)

Rule Authority · 8th Cir.

United States. v. Beltran-Arce, 415 F.3d 949, 949 (8th Cir.2005). 1 Cawthorn claims the prosecutions’s swabs and related testimony were scientifically unsound and thus inadmissible.

green United States v. Hashim Amin Cawthorn (2005)

Rule Authority · 8th Cir.

United States. v. Beltran-Arce, 415 F.3d 949, 949 (8th Cir. 2005). 1 Cawthorn claims the prosecutions’s swabs and related testimony were scientifically unsound and thus inadmissible.

green United States v. Eric Conroy (2005)

Rule Authority · 8th Cir.

Further, an expert’s testimony generally is admissible when it “substantially track[s] the summary report.” United States v. Beltran-Arce, 415 F.3d 949, 953 (8th Cir. 2005).

green United States v. Eric Conroy (2005)

Rule Authority · 8th Cir.

Further, an expert’s testimony generally is admissible when it “substantially track[s] the summary report.” United States v. Beltran-Arce, 415 F.3d 949, 953 (8th Cir. 2005).

green United States v. Chadwick Wayne Acison (2005)

Rule Authority · 8th Cir.

See United States v. Rodriguez-Ceballos, 407 F.3d 937, 941-42 (8th Cir.2005); United States v. Beltran-Arce, 415 F.3d 949, 954 (8th Cir.2005).

green United States v. Chadwick W. Acison (2005)

Rule Authority · 8th Cir.

See United States v. Rodriguez-Ceballos, 407 F.3d 937, 941-42 (8th Cir. 2005); United States v. Beltran-Arce, No. 03-4035, 2005 WL 1773794, at * 4 (8th Cir. July 28, 2005). -3- Although the district court previously stated a specific term of imprisonment that would be imposed “if the guidelines are declared unconstitutional,” the court at that time did not have the benefit of guidance from Booker, including the requirement that a district court must consider the advisory gui…

green John Gabor v. Rebecca Harris et.al. (2022)

Rule Authority · E.D. Wash.

Oak Harbor Freight 12 Lines, Inc. v. Sears Roebuck, & Co., 415 F.3d 949, 961 (9th Cir. 2008).

green Heimlicher v. Steele (2009)

Rule Authority · N.D. Iowa

A cautionary instruction is “ ‘generally sufficient to alleviate prejudice flowing from improper testimony.’ ” United States v. Beltran-Arce, 415 F.3d 949, 953-54 (8th Cir.2005) (quoting United States v. Davidson, 122 F.3d 531, 538 (8th Cir.1997)); see Harrison v. Purdy Bros.