Benvenuti Oil Co. v. Foss Consultants, Inc. (2001)
green
· 28 citation events
across 3 courts.
Showing the 6 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 2001 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
200120132026
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
green
Parimal v. Manitex International, Inc. (2023)
Benvenuti Oil Co., 64 Conn. App. at 728 (“The parol evidence rule does not apply, however, if the written contract is not completely integrated.”).
“The parol evidence rule does not apply, however, if the written contract is not completely integrated.”
green
Doe v. Hotchkiss School (2024)
Settlement Agreement ¶ 6.2, ECF No. 3-1 (Aug. 26, 2022). “[A] merger clause inserted into an agreement establishes conclusive proof of the parties’ intent to create a completely integrated contract,” and where a merger clause is present, “the court is forbidden from considering extrinsic evidence[.]” Benvenuti Oil Co., Inc. v. Foss Consultants, Inc., 781 A.2d 435, 439 (Conn. App. Ct. 2001) (citing Tallmadge Bros. v. Iroquois Gas Transmission Sys., L.P., 746 A.2d 1277 , 1290–…
citing Tallmadge Bros. v. Iroquois Gas Transmission Sys., L.P., 746 A.2d 1277 , 1290–91 (Conn. 2000) (describing “the general principle that the unambiguous terms of a written contract containing a merger clause may not be varied or contradicted by extrinsic evidence”)
green
Doe v. Hotchkiss School (2024)
Settlement Agreement ¶ 6.2, ECF No. 3-1 (Aug. 26, 2022). “[A] merger clause inserted into an agreement establishes conclusive proof of the parties’ intent to create a completely integrated contract,” and where a merger clause is present, “the court is forbidden from considering extrinsic evidence[.]” Benvenuti Oil Co., Inc. v. Foss Consultants, Inc., 781 A.2d 435, 439 (Conn. App. Ct. 2001) (citing Tallmadge Bros. v. Iroquois Gas Transmission Sys., L.P., 746 A.2d 1277 , 1290–…
citing Tallmadge Bros. v. Iroquois Gas Transmission Sys., L.P., 746 A.2d 1277 , 1290–91 (Conn. 2000) (describing “the general principle that the unambiguous terms of a written contract containing a merger clause may not be varied or contradicted by extrinsic evidence”)
green
Munoz v. JLO Automotive, Inc. (2020)
In Connecticut, the parol evidence rule, which “prohibits the use of extrinsic evidence to vary or contradict the terms of an integrated written contract,” “does not apply . . . if the written contract is not completely integrated.” Benvenuti Oil Co., Inc. v. Foss Consultants, Inc., 64 Conn. App. 723, 727 (2001).
green
EH Investment Co., LLC v. Chappo LLC (2017)
See id., at 728-29 , 781 A.2d 435 .
green
Allen v. Allen (2012)
See Benvenuti Oil Co. v. Foss Consultants, Inc., 64 Conn. App. 723, 727 , 781 A.2d 435 (2001) (“[t]he parol evidence rule prohibits the use of extrinsic evidence to vary or contradict the terms of an integrated written contract” [internal quotation marks omitted]). 12 In addition, we note that, on remand, the court should consider the support guidelines and best interests of the minor children in determining whether and in what amount, if any, to offset against the defendant…
“[t]he parol evidence rule prohibits the use of extrinsic evidence to vary or contradict the terms of an integrated written contract” [internal quotation marks omitted]