In the Interest of J. L. E. (2006)

green · 20 citation events across 1 courts. Showing the 11 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).

All Green 11

Treatment trajectory · 2007 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then

200720162026

Sort: By significance · Most recent

green Neill v. Brannon (2013)

Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App. · 2 citations in this opinion

E., 281 Ga. App. 805, 806-807 ( 637 SE2d 446 ) (2006) (obtaining the results of genetic testing is not a condition precedent to filing a legitimation petition under OCGA § 19-7-22); see OCGA §§ 19-7-43 (d); 19-7-45.

green Kelly Neill v. Charles Brannon (2013)

Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App. · 2 citations in this opinion

green In the Interest of J. M. (2008)

Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App. · 2 citations in this opinion

E., 281 Ga. App. 805, 806 ( 637 SE2d 446 ) (2006) (holding that “obtaining the results of genetic testing is not a condition precedent to filing a legitimation petition”).

green In the Interest of C. S., a Child, (Father) (2020)

Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App.

E., 281 Ga. App. 805, 806-07 ( 637 SE2d 446 ) (2006) (affirming the denial of a legitimation petition when the biological father waited nearly a year after the child was born to file a legitimation petition, had not had contact with the child since he was eight months old, and due to incarceration, the father was currently unable to develop a meaningful relationship with the child). 24 Thus, we cannot say that the juvenile court erred in finding that Chauncy was not prejudic…

green In the Interest of G. Q. (2014)

Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App.

E., 281 Ga. App. 805, 807 ( 637 SE2d 446 ) (2006); In the Interest of D.

green In the Interest Of: G. Q. and Y. Q., Children (Father) (2014)

Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App.

E., 281 Ga. App. 805, 807 ( 637 SE2d 446 ) (2006); In the Interest of D.

green Phillip Wade Wilbourn v. Courtney Rabon Lumpkin (2014)

Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App.

E., 281 Ga. App. 805, 806 ( 637 SE2d 446 ) (2006) (noting that obtaining the results of genetic testing is not a prerequisite to filing a legitimation petition). 9 Compare Binns, 292 Ga. App. at 338 (concluding that, even if the biological father could have done more, the father’s constant payment of child support, coupled with his avowed interest in establishing and maintaining a relationship with the child, was nevertheless not so little as to constitute abandonment of his…

green Wilbourn v. Lumpkin (2014)

Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App.

E., 281 Ga. App. 805, 806 ( 637 SE2d 446 ) (2006) (noting that obtaining the results of genetic testing is not a prerequisite to filing a legitimation petition).

green Morris v. Morris (2011)

Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App.

E., 281 Ga. App. 805, 806-807 ( 637 SE2d 446 ) (2006).

green In Re LST (2007)

Quote Authority · Ga. Ct. App.

See OCGA § 15-11-96(i)(3); In the Interest of J.L.E., 281 Ga.App. 805, 807 , 637 S.E.2d 446 (2006) ("[b]ecause appellant failed to legitimate [the child], he lacked standing to challenge the termination of his parental rights") (citations omitted).

"[b]ecause appellant failed to legitimate [the child], he lacked standing to challenge the termination of his parental rights"

green In the Interest of L. S. T. (2007)

Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App.

E., 281 Ga. App. 805, 807 ( 637 SE2d 446 ) (2006) (“[bjecause appellant failed to legitimate [the child], he lacked standing to challenge the termination of his parental rights”) (citations omitted).