Riley v. United States (1979)
green
· 60 citation events
across 4 courts.
Showing the 13 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1979 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
197920022026
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
green
Murphy v. United States (1989)
Riley v. United States, 221 Ct.Cl. 308, 315, 608 F.2d 441, 444 (1979).
green
Hary v. United States (1980)
See Sanders v. United States, 219 Ct. Cl. 285, 310-11 , 594 F.2d 804, 818 (1979); Skinner v. United States, 219 Ct. Cl. 322, 328-29 , 594 F.2d 824, 828 (1979); Riley v. United States, 221 Ct. Cl. 308, 313 , 608 F.2d 441, 443-44 (1979); Guy v. United States, 221 Ct. Cl. 427, 435-41 , 608 F.2d 867, 872-74, 875 (1979). 4 To recover back pay, it is not enough for the plaintiff to show merely that an error or injustice was committed in the administrative process; he must go furth…
green
Womack v. United States (1996)
Riley v. United States, 221 Ct.Cl. 308, 312 , 608 F.2d 441, 443 (1979).
green
Germano v. United States (1992)
Without the offending OFR, plaintiffs naval record presents “a picture of steady advancement and increased competence and efficiency.” Riley v. United States, 221 Ct.Cl. 308, 312-13 , 608 F.2d 441, 443 (1979).
green
Murphy v. United States (1990)
In 1979, the court concluded his separation had been illegal and, two years after his actual retirement from active duty, ordered that he “be given, if he wishes, restoration to active duty commissioned status.” 13 Riley v. United States, 221 Ct.Cl. 308, 315 , 608 F.2d 441, 445 (1979).
green
Muse v. United States (1987)
Riley v. United States, 221 Ct.Cl. 308, 314 , 608 F.2d 441, 444 (1979).
green
Braddock v. United States (1986)
In Riley v. United States, 221 Ct.Cl. 308, 314-15 , 608 F.2d 441, 444 (1979), the plaintiff waited four years to challenge one OER and five years to challenge another OER, before filing a claim for their removal with the Officer Personnel Records Review Board.
green
Horn v. United States (1982)
As this court squarely held in Riley v. United States, 221 Ct. Cl. 308, 312 , 608 F.2d 441, 444 (1979), the inclusion of the prior non-selection record, under such circumstances, constituted prejudicial error which renders the decision of the June 6, 1978 selection board invalid.
green
Grieg v. United States (1981)
Riley v. United States, 221 Ct. Cl. 308, 313 , 608 F.2d 441, 443 (1979), and Skinner v. United States, 219 Ct. Cl. 322, 330-31 , 594 F.2d 824, 829 (1979).
green
Gruendyke v. United States (1981)
Riley v. United States, 221 Ct.Cl. 308, 312 , 608 F.2d 441, 443 (1979).
green
Reid (1979)
The specific standard for recovery was enunciated in Riley v. United States, ante at 312, 608 F. 2d 441, 443 (1979), where this court stated, "[t]o recover under this standard, it must be shown that there was prejudicial legal or factual error or injustice in the manner of the selection board’s consideration of plaintiff for promotion.
green
Russell G. Johnson v. Thomas C. Reed, Secretary, United States Air Force, and United States of America (1980)
See also Riley v. United States, 608 F.2d 441 (Ct. C1.1979).
green
Fescina v. United States (1987)
See, e.g., Riley v. United States, 221 Ct.Cl. 308, 314-15 , 608 F.2d 441, 444 (1979) (holding that plaintiff who waited four years to challenge one OER and five years to challenge another before the SRB was not barred by the doctrine of laches); Braddock, 9 Cl.Ct. at 471 (1986) (holding that an individual who pursued administrative remedies was not barred by laches even where his petition in the United States Court of Claims was filed four years after his discharge from serv…
holding that plaintiff who waited four years to challenge one OER and five years to challenge another before the SRB was not barred by the doctrine of laches