How cited: Alford v. Central Intelligence Agency · Go Syfert

Alford v. Central Intelligence Agency (1980)

green · 25 citation events across 9 courts. Showing the 6 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1982 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
198220042026
Cited (see also) · 5th Cir. · signal: compare · 2 citations in this opinion
Compare United States v. Vargas, 621 F.2d 54, 56 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 854 , 101 S.Ct. 150 , 66 L.Ed.2d 68 (1980); United States v. Cutts, 535 F.2d 1083, 1084 (8th Cir. 1976) (holding that inadvertence requirement is unnecessary in cases of seizure of contraband), with United States v. Ortega, 644 F.2d 512, 515 (5th Cir. 1981); United States v. Roberts, 644 F.2d 683, 686 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 821 , 101 S.Ct. 79 , 66 L.Ed.2d 23 (1980); United States v…
holding that inadvertence requirement is unnecessary in cases of seizure of contraband
Cited · 5th Cir. · signal: see
Id. at-, 105 S.Ct. at 1983 , 85 L.Ed. at 183. 13 . 5 U.S.C. § 552a(d)(l). 14 . 5 U.S.C. § 552a(k)(5). 15 . 5 U.S.C. § 552a(k)(6). 16 . 5 U.S.C. § 552a(j)(l). 17 . 32 C.F.R. § 1901.61 (d)(1); see Alford v. C.I.A., 610 F.2d 348, 349 (5th Cir.) cert. denied, 449 U.S. 854 , 101 S.Ct. 150 , 66 L.Ed.2d 68 (1980). 18 . 32 C.F.R. § 1901.61 (a)(1). 19 .
green Birt v. Montgomery (1982)
Cited · S.D. Ga. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See Birt v. Hopper, 245 Ga. 221 , 265 S.E.2d 276 , cert. denied, 449 U.S. 855 , 101 S.Ct. 150 , 66 L.Ed.2d 68 (1980).
green United States v. Lake (2002)
Cited (see also) · E.D.N.Y · signal: see also
United States v. George, 975 F.2d 72, 75 (2d Cir.1992) (citing Steele v. United States, 267 U.S. 498, 503-04 , 45 S.Ct. 414 , 69 L.Ed. 757 (1925)); see also United States v. Vargas, 621 F.2d 54, 56 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 854 , 101 S.Ct. 150 , 66 L.Ed.2d 68 (1980).
Cited (see also) · S.D.N.Y. · signal: compare
Compare United States v. Vargas, 621 F.2d 54, 56 (2d Cir.) (use of ruse to gain admission to an apartment after the issuance of a warrant is fully justified), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 854 , 101 S.Ct. 150 , 66 L.Ed.2d 68 (1980).
Cited (see also) · S.D.N.Y. · signal: see also
The Supreme Court “has repeatedly held that the Fourth Amendment does not prohibit the obtaining of information revealed to a third party and conveyed by him to Government authorities, even if the information is revealed on the assumption that it will be used only for a limited purpose and the confidence placed in the third party will not be betrayed.” United States v. Miller, 425 U.S. 435, 443 , 96 S.Ct. 1619, 1624 , 48 L.Ed.2d 71 (1976) (citations omitted); see also United…
“Even absent a warrant, stratagem or deception used to obtain evidence is generally permissible.” (citing Lewis v. United States, supra, 385 U.S. 206, 208-09 , 87 S.Ct. 424, 426 )