Boag v. Chief of Police of Portland (1982)

green · 100 citation events across 25 courts. Showing the 19 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).

All Green 19

Treatment trajectory · 1983 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then

198320042026

Sort: By significance · Most recent

green Bentley v. Scully (1994)

Quote Authority · S.D.N.Y.

In Quirama v. Michele, the Second Circuit affirmed a District Court’s refusal, pursuant to the Supreme Court’s ruling in Coleman , to review state court affirmances without opinion on the theory that it is “reasonable to presume that silence in the face of arguments asserting a procedural bar indicated that the affirmance was on state grounds.” Quirama v. Michele, 983 F.2d 12, 14 (2d Cir.1993) (“Quirama”) (citing and “reaffirming]” Martinez v. Harris, 675 F.2d 51, 54-55 (2d …

“Martinez”

green United States v. Mathis (1996)

Cited · 11th Cir. · signal: see

See United States v. Crosby, 739 F.2d 1542, 1548 (11th Cir.) (citing United States v. Marx, 635 F.2d 436, 440-441 (5th Cir. Unit B 1981) and United States v. Contreras, 667 F.2d 976 , 978 n. 2 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 849 , 103 S.Ct. 109 , 74 L.Ed.2d 97 (1982)), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1076 , 105 S.Ct. 576 , 83 L.Ed.2d 515 (1984); see also United States v. Vasquez, 858 F.2d 1387, 1389 (9th Cir.1988), ce rt. denied, 488 U.S. 1034 , 109 S.Ct. 847 , 102 L.Ed.2d 978 an…

green United States v. Leonardo Chavez (1990)

Cited (see also) · 4th Cir. · signal: compare

Compare also United States v. Ulloa, 882 F.2d 41, 43 (2d Cir.1989) (failure to make timely motion constitutes waiver of that right even where trial court considers the merits), and United States v. Oldfield, 859 F.2d 392, 396 (6th Cir.1988) (issues raised in untimely motion to suppress are waived on appeal “even though the district court rules on the merits”), with United States v. Vasquez, 858 F.2d 1387, 1389 (9th Cir.1988) (when “district court considers and resolves an un…

green United States v. Rodolfo Morales, Paul Kolb, Jorge Manzano (1989)

Cited (see also) · 11th Cir. · signal: see also

In the present case Kolb’s explanation of his involvement is so unbelievable that “it gives rise to positive evidence in favor of the government.” United States v. Eley, 723 F.2d at 1525 ; see also United States v. Contreras, 667 F.2d 976, 980 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 849 , 103 S.Ct. 109 , 74 L.Ed.2d 97 (1982).

green Ethel L. Hardin v. Gary Black, Warden (1988)

Cited · 11th Cir. · signal: see

See, Campbell v. Wainwright, 738 F.2d 1573, 1578 (11th Cir.1984), adopting the reasoning of Martinez v. Harris, 675 F.2d 51 (2d Cir.), cert denied, 459 U.S. 849 , 103 S.Ct. 109 , 74 L.Ed.2d 97 (1982). 7 .

green Harper v. Bowen (1987)

Cited · 5th Cir. · signal: see

See United States v. Contreras, 667 F.2d 976, 979 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 849 , 103 S.Ct. 109 , 74 L.Ed.2d 97 (1982). .

green Harper v. Bowen (1987)

Cited · 5th Cir. · signal: see

See United States v. Contreras, 667 F.2d 976, 979 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 849 , 103 S.Ct. 109 , 74 L.Ed.2d 97 (1982) 2 These regulations now appear at 20 C.F.R.

green Holland v. Scully (1986)

Cited · 2d Cir. · signal: see

See Martinez v. Harris, 675 F.2d 51 (2d Cir.) (establishing presumption that summary denial was based on procedural grounds), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 849 , 103 S.Ct. 109 , 74 L.Ed.2d 97 (1982). 58 Further, as the Magistrate pointed out, accepting Holland's view would undermine the procedural bar rule of N.Y.C.P.L.

green Holland v. Scully (1986)

Cited · 2d Cir. · signal: see

See Martinez v. Harris, 675 F.2d 51 (2d Cir.) (establishing presumption that summary denial was based on procedural grounds), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 849 , 103 S.Ct. 109 , 74 L.Ed.2d 97 (1982).

green Jesse James Jackson v. Charles C. Scully, Superintendent, Green Haven Correctional Facility (1986)

Cited · 2d Cir. · signal: see

When the state appellate courts are silent as to the basis for dismissal of a claim, we have assumed that the basis for the dismissal is procedural default "only if the state prosecutor argued procedural default in the state appellate court.” Barber v. Scully, 731 F.2d 1073, 1075 (2d Cir.1984); see Martinez v. Harris, 675 F.2d 51, 54 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 849 , 103 S.Ct. 109 , 74 L.Ed.2d 97 (1982).

green United States v. Armando Benitez (1984)

Cited · 11th Cir. · signal: see

See United States v. Contreras, 667 F.2d 976, 980 (11th Cir.), cert, denied, 459 U.S. 849 , 103 S.Ct. 109 , 74 L.Ed.2d 97 (1982).

green Calvin Carlos Campbell v. Louie L. Wainwright, Secretary, Department of Corrections (1984)

Cited · 11th Cir. · signal: see

See supra note 2.) 4 In deciding whether the state court reached the merits, we adopt the reasoning of the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in Martinez v. Harris, 675 F.2d 51, 54 (2d Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 849 , 103 S.Ct. 109 , 74 L.Ed.2d 97 (1982).

green Brown v. Crosby (2003)

Cited · S.D. Fla. · signal: see

See United States v. Contreras, 667 F.2d 976, 979 (11th Cir.) (warnings adequate where they advised of “right to consult with an attorney prior to questioning, to have an attorney present during questioning, and to have counsel appointed”), ce rt. den., 459 U.S. 849 , 103 S.Ct. 109 , 74 L.Ed.2d 97 (1982); Caparrosa v. Gov’t of Canal Zone, 411 F.2d 956 (5th Cir.1969) (warnings inadequate where they failed to inform of right to counsel present during his interrogation); Atwell…

green Cannon v. District of Columbia (1990)

Cited · D.C. · signal: see

See Boag v. Chief of Police, City of Portland, 669 F.2d 587, 589 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 849 , 103 S.Ct. 109 , 74 L.Ed.2d 97 (1982); Jordan v. State, 290 N.Y.S.2d 621, 625 , 56 Misc.2d 1032 (N.Y.Ct.Cl.1968); Jepson v. Stubbs, 555 S.W.2d 307, 311 (Mo.1977) ( en banc); Jimenez v. Maloney, 646 S.W.2d 673, 674-75 (Tex.App.1983).

green Walker v. Hood (1988)

Cited (see also) · S.D.N.Y. · signal: see also

See also Martinez v. Harris, 675 F.2d 51, 53 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 849 , 103 S.Ct. 109 , 74 L.Ed.2d 97 (1982).

green Farinaro v. Kirk (1987)

Cited · E.D.N.Y · signal: see

See Martinez v. Harris, 675 F.2d 51 , 54-55 & n. 5 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 849 , 103 S.Ct. 109 , 74 L.Ed.2d 97 (1982).

green Turner v. Sullivan (1987)

Cited · E.D.N.Y · signal: see

See Martinez v. Harris, 675 F.2d 51, 55 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 849 , 103 S.Ct. 109 , 74 L.Ed.2d 97 (1982).

green Fox v. State (1984)

Cited (see also) · Alaska Ct. App. · signal: see, e.g.

See, e.g., United States v. Contreras, 667 F.2d 976 , 978 n. 2 (11th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 849 , 103 S.Ct. 109 , 74 L.Ed.2d 97 (1982); United States v. Gresham, 585 F.2d 103, 108 (5th Cir.1978); United States v. Schwartz, 535 F.2d 160, 163 (2d Cir.1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 906 , 97 S.Ct. 1175 , 51 L.Ed.2d 581 (1977); State v. Griffin, 117 Ariz. 54 , 570 P.2d 1067, 1069 (1977); State v. Neese, 126 Ariz. 499 , 616 P.2d 959, 966-67 (Ariz.App, 1980); People v. Ma…

green Grant v. Abrams (1984)

Cited · S.D.N.Y. · signal: see

See Martinez v. Harris, 675 F.2d 51 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 849 , 103 S.Ct. 109 , 74 L.Ed.2d 97 (1982).