How cited: Woolls v. Texas · Go Syfert

Woolls v. Texas (1984)

green · 87 citation events across 10 courts. Showing the 10 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1985 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
198520052026
Quote Authority · 9th Cir.
FACTUAL BACKGROUND The underlying facts are portrayed in detail in State v. Paradis, 106 Idaho 117 , 676 P.2d 31 ( 1983), cert. denied, 468 U.S. 1220 , 104 S.Ct. 3592 , 82 L.Ed.2d 888 (1984) (“Paradis I ”), and Paradis v. Arave, 667 F.Supp. 1361 (D.Idaho 1987) (“Paradis II”), aff'd in part and rev’d in part, 954 F.2d 1483 (9th Cir.1992) (“Paradis III”), vacated and remanded, 507 U.S. 1026 , 113 S.Ct. 1837 , 123 L.Ed.2d 463 (1993), aff'd on remand, 20 F.3d 950 (9th Cir.1994),…
“Paradis II”
green State v. Pratt (1993)
Cited · Idaho · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See State v. Gibson, 106 Idaho 54, 62 , 675 P.2d 33, 41 (1983), cert. denied, 468 U.S. 1220 , 104 S.Ct. 3592 , 82 L.Ed.2d 888 (1984).
green State v. Dambrell (1991)
Cited · Idaho · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See, State v. Gibson, 106 Idaho 54, 58 , 675 P.2d 33 , cert. denied, 468 U.S. 1220 , 104 S.Ct. 3592 , 82 L.Ed.2d 888 (1984).
green Poole v. State (1998)
Cited · Tex. App. · signal: see
See Woolls v. State, 665 S.W.2d 455, 470 (Tex. Crim.App.1983), cert. denied, 468 U.S. 1220 , 104 S.Ct. 3592 , 82 L.Ed.2d 889 (1984) (holding no reversible error in admission of testimony relating to extraneous offense where evidence of same acts properly admitted elsewhere at trial).
holding no reversible error in admission of testimony relating to extraneous offense where evidence of same acts properly admitted elsewhere at trial
green State v. Marks (1991)
Cited (see also) · Idaho Ct. App. · signal: see also
However, such acts may be “admissible for other purposes, such as proof of motive, opportunity, intent, preparation, plan, knowledge, identity, or absence of mistake or accident.” I.R.E. 404(b); see also State v. Paradis, 106 Idaho 117 , 676 P.2d 31 (1984), cert. denied, 468 U.S. 1220 , 104 S.Ct. 3592 , 82 L.Ed.2d 888 (1984); State v. Wrenn, 99 Idaho 506 , 584 P.2d 1231 (1978); State v. Hatton, 95 Idaho 856 , 522 P.2d 64 (1974); State v. Shepherd, 94 Idaho 227 , 486 P.2d 82
green State v. Reynolds (1991)
Cited · Idaho Ct. App. · signal: see
See State v. Gibson, 106 Idaho 54 , 675 P.2d 33 (1983), cert. denied, 468 U.S. 1220 , 104 S.Ct. 3592 , 82 L.Ed.2d 888 (1984).
green Hill v. State (1990)
Cited (see also) · Tex. App. · signal: see, e.g.
See, e.g., Woolls v. State, 665 S.W.2d 455, 467 (Tex.Crim.App.1983), cert. denied, 468 U.S. 1220 , 104 S.Ct. 3592 , 82 L.Ed.2d 889 (1984) (jury not impanelled until sworn as a body); Reese v. State, 142 Tex.Crim. 254, 266-67 , 151 S.W.2d 828, 835 (1941) (impanelled implies grand jurors sworn); Howard v. State, 80 Tex.Crim. 588, 591-92 , 192 S.W. 770, 772 (1917) (jury not impanelled until sworn); Stephens v. State, 33 Tex.Crim. 101, 102 , 25 S.W. 286, 286 (1894) (jury not imp…
jury not impanelled until sworn as a body
green C----E----J v. State (1990)
Cited (see also) · Tex. App. · signal: see also
See also Woolls v. State, 665 S.W.2d 455, 467 (Tex.Crim.App.1983), cert. denied, 468 U.S. 1220 , 104 S.Ct. 3592 , 82 L.Ed.2d 889 (1984) (jury not impanelled until sworn as a body); B.
jury not impanelled until sworn as a body
green C_ E_ J v. State (1990)
Cited (see also) · Tex. App. · signal: see also
See also Woolls v. State, 665 S.W.2d 455, 467 (Tex.Crim.App.1983), cert. denied, 468 U.S. 1220 , 104 S.Ct. 3592 , 82 L.Ed.2d 889 (1984) (jury not impanelled until sworn as a body); B.
jury not impanelled until sworn as a body
green State v. Winkler (1987)
Cited (see also) · Idaho Ct. App. · signal: see, e.g.
State v. Roach, 109 Idaho 973, 974 , 712 P.2d 674, 675 (Ct.App.1985); see, e.g., State v. Paradis, 106 Idaho 117 , 676 P.2d 31 (1983), cert. denied, 468 U.S. 1220 , 104 S.Ct. 3592 , 82 L.Ed.2d 888 (1984).