How cited: Hyatt v. Bowen · Go Syfert

Hyatt v. Bowen (1986)

green · 269 citation events across 22 courts. Showing the 31 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1986 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
198620062026
Cited · 8th Cir. · signal: see · 4 citations in this opinion
See Polaski v. Heckler, 585 F.Supp. 1004, 1011-1013, 1016, 1018-1019 (D.Minn.), dismissed, 751 F.2d 943 (8th Cir.1984), vacated and remanded on other grounds, 476 U.S. 1167 , 106 S.Ct. 2885 , 90 L.Ed.2d 974 , reinstated, 804 F.2d 456 (1986), cert denied, --- U.S. ----, 107 S.Ct. 3211 , 96 L.Ed.2d 698 (1987). 29 Third, in Rush we noted that the regulations governing terminations "simply do not say what the Secretary says they mean.
Cited · 4th Cir. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See Hyatt v. Bowen, 476 U.S. 1167 , 106 S.Ct. 2886 , 90 L.Ed.2d 974 (1986); Hyatt v. Heckler, 757 F.2d 1455 (4th Cir.1985) (Hyatt I); Hyatt v. Heckler, 807 F.2d 376 (4th Cir.1986) (Hyatt II); Hyatt v. Sullivan, 899 F.2d 329 (4th Cir.1990) (Hyatt III); and Hyatt v. Shalala, 6 F.3d 250 (4th Cir.1993) (Hyatt IV). 1 The history of this litigation has been set out in some detail in our previous opinions, and we will not repeat it here.
green Jones v. Callahan 1 (1997)
Cited · 8th Cir. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See Bowen v. Polaski, 476 U.S. 1167 , 106 S.Ct. 2885 , 90 L.Ed.2d 974 (1986).
Cited · 8th Cir. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See Bowen v. Polaski, 476 U.S. 1167 , 106 S.Ct. 2885 , 90 L.Ed.2d 974 (1986).
Cited · 8th Cir. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See Polaski v. Heckler, 739 F.2d 1320, 1322 , supplemented, 751 F.2d 943 (8th Cir.1984), vacated, 476 U.S. 1167 , 106 S.Ct. 2885 , 90 L.Ed.2d 974 , adhered to on remand, 804 F.2d 456 (8th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 482 U.S. 927 , 107 S.Ct. 3211 , 96 L.Ed.2d 698 (1987). .
Cited · 8th Cir. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See Polaski v. Heckler, 739 F.2d 1320, 1322 (8th Cir.) (putting forth the factors on which to focus in determining the credibility of a claimant’s assertion of disabling pain), supplemented, 751 F.2d 943 (8th Cir.1984), vacated, 476 U.S. 1167 , 106 S.Ct. 2885 , 90 L.Ed.2d 974 (1986), adhered to on remand, 804 F.2d 456 (8th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 482 U.S. 927 , 107 S.Ct. 3211 , 96 L.Ed.2d 698 (1987).
green Simons v. Sullivan (1990)
Cited (see also) · 8th Cir. · signal: see also · 2 citations in this opinion
An AU may disregard a claimant’s allegation of pain if, based on consideration of all the evidence, the AU “explicitly discredits allegations of pain for a legally sufficient reason.” Millbrook v. Heckler, 780 F.2d 1371, 1373-74 (8th Cir.1985); see also Polaski v. Heckler, 739 F.2d 1320, 1321-22 , supplemented, 751 F.2d 943 (8th Cir.1984), vacated, 476 U.S. 1167 , 106 S.Ct. 2885 , 90 L.Ed.2d 974 (1986), adhered to on remand, 804 F.2d 456 (8th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 482 U.S…
green Simons v. Sullivan (1990)
Cited (see also) · 8th Cir. · signal: see also · 2 citations in this opinion
"Where a non-exertional impairment does so limit the claimant, the Secretary can only carry his burden through use of a vocational expert who can realistically appraise available work that can be performed by the claimant, given his existing abilities." Talbott, 821 F.2d at 515 . 22 An ALJ may disregard a claimant's allegation of pain if, based on consideration of all the evidence, the ALJ "explicitly discredits allegations of pain for a legally sufficient reason." Millbrook…
Cited (see also) · 10th Cir. · signal: see also · 2 citations in this opinion
See also Polaski v. Heckler, 751 F.2d 943, 948 (8th Cir.1984), vacated and remanded on other grounds, 476 U.S. 1167 , 106 S.Ct. 2885 , 90 L.Ed.2d 974 (1986).
green Hyatt v. Apfel (1999)
Cited · 4th Cir. · signal: see
See Hyatt v. Bowen, 476 U.S. 1167 (1986); Hyatt v. Heckler, 757 F.2d 1455 (4th Cir. 1985) (Hyatt I); Hyatt v. Heckler , 807 F.2d 376 (4th Cir. 1986) (Hyatt II); Hyatt v. Sullivan, 899 F.2d 329 (4th Cir. 1990) (Hyatt III); and Hyatt v. Shalala, 6 F.3d 250 (4th Cir. 1993) (Hyatt IV). 1 3 The history of this litigation has been set out in some detail in our previous opinions, and we will not repeat it here.
Hyatt I
Cited · 8th Cir. · signal: see
See Herbert v. Heckler, 783 F.2d 128, 130 (8th Cir.1986) (interpreting Polaski v. Heckler, 751 F.2d 943 (8th Cir.1984), vacated and remanded on other grounds, — U.S. -, 106 S.Ct. 2885 , 90 L.Ed.2d 974 , reinstated, 804 F.2d 456 (1986), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 107 S.Ct. 3211 , 96 L.Ed.2d 698 (1987)).
Cited (see also) · 8th Cir. · signal: see, e.g.
See, e.g., Polaski v. Heckler, 751 F.2d 943, 948 (8th Cir.1984) [vacated and remanded, — U.S.-, 106 S.Ct. 2885 , 90 L.Ed.2d 974 (1986), reinstated, 804 F.2d 456 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 107 S.Ct. 3211, 96 L.Ed.2d 698 (1987) ]; Layton v. Heckler, 726 F.2d 440, 442 (8th Cir.1984); Ragsdale v. Secretary, Department of Health, Education and Welfare, 623 F.2d 528, 530 (8th Cir.1980).
green In Re James Sebben (1987)
Cited (see also) · 8th Cir. · signal: see also
See also Polaski v. Heckler, 751 F.2d 943, 951 (8th Cir.1984) (citing Mental Health Ass'n of Minnesota v. Heckler, 720 F.2d 965, 969 (8th Cir.1983)), vacated and remanded, --- U.S. ----, 106 S.Ct. 2885 , 90 L.Ed.2d 974 (1986), reinstated, 804 F.2d 456 .
green Sebben v. Brock (1987)
Cited (see also) · 8th Cir. · signal: see also
See also Polaski v. Heckler, 751 F.2d 943, 951 (8th Cir.1984) (citing Mental Health Ass’n of Minnesota v. Heckler, 720 F.2d 965, 969 (8th Cir.1983)), vacated and remanded, — U.S.-, 106 S.Ct. 2885 , 90 L.Ed.2d 974 (1986), reinstated, 804 F.2d 456 .
green Wigg v. Chater (1995)
Cited (see also) · N.D. Iowa · signal: see also · 4 citations in this opinion
Hinchey v. Shalala, 29 F.3d 428, 432 (8th Cir.1994); see also Bishop v. Sullivan, 900 F.2d 1259, 1262 (8th Cir.1990) (citing Polaski v. Heckler, 739 F.2d 1320, 1322 , supplemented, 751 F.2d 943 (8th Cir.1984), vacated, 476 U.S. 1167 , 106 S.Ct. 2885 , 90 L.Ed.2d 974 adhered to on remand, 804 F.2d 456 (8th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 482 U.S. 927 , 107 S.Ct. 3211 , 96 L.Ed.2d 698 (1987)).
green Derrig v. Chater (1995)
Cited (see also) · N.D. Iowa · signal: see also · 4 citations in this opinion
Hinchey v. Shalala, 29 F.3d 428, 432 (8th Cir.1994); see also Bishop v. Sullivan, 900 F.2d 1259, 1262 (8th Cir.1990) (citing Polaski v. Heckler, 739 F.2d 1320, 1322 , supplemented, 751 F.2d 943 (8th Cir.1984), vacated, 476 U.S. 1167 , 106 S.Ct. 2885 , 90 L.Ed.2d 974 adhered to on remand, 804 F.2d 456 (8th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 482 U.S. 927 , 107 S.Ct. 3211 , 96 L.Ed.2d 698 (1987)).
green Britton v. Astrue (2008)
Cited · D. Minnesota · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See 739 F.2d 1320, 1322 (8th Cir. 1984) (vacated on other grounds by Bowen v. Polaski, 476 U.S. 1167 , 106 S.Ct. 2885 , 90 L.Ed.2d 974 (1986)). 4 The ALJ discounted the credibility of Britton’s statements based on (1) the objective medical record, including numerous instances in which Britton denied experiencing any pain at all and evidence from medical sources opining that Britton’s concentration was limited to only a moderate degree; (2) the amount and frequency of Britton…
green Alverio v. Chater (1995)
Cited (see also) · N.D. Iowa · signal: see also · 2 citations in this opinion
Hinchey v. Shalala, 29 F.3d 428, 432 (8th Cir.1994); see also Bishop v. Sullivan, 900 F.2d 1259, 1262 (8th Cir.1990) (citing Polaski v. Heckler, 739 F.2d 1320, 1322 , supplemented, 751 F.2d 943 (8th Cir.1984), vacated, 476 U.S. 1167 , 106 S.Ct. 2885 , 90 L.Ed.2d 974 , adhered to on remand, 804 F.2d 456 (8th Cir.1986), cert. denied 482 U.S. 927 , 107 S.Ct. 3211 , 96 L.Ed.2d 698 (1987)).
green Barry v. Shalala (1995)
Cited (see also) · N.D. Iowa · signal: see also · 2 citations in this opinion
Hinchey v. Shalala, 29 F.3d 428, 432 (8th Cir.1994); see also Bishop v. Sullivan, 900 F.2d 1259, 1262 (8th Cir.1990) (citing Polaski v. Heckler, 739 F.2d 1320 (order), supplemented, 751 F.2d 943 (8th Cir.1984), vacated, 476 U.S. 1167 , 106 S.Ct. 2885 , 90 L.Ed.2d 974 , adhered to on remand, 804 F.2d 456 (8th Cir.1986), cert, denied, 482 U.S. 927 , 107 S.Ct. 3211 , 96 L.Ed.2d 698 (1987)).
green Norng v. Shalala (1995)
Cited (see also) · N.D. Iowa · signal: see also · 2 citations in this opinion
Hinchey v. Shalala, 29 F.3d 428, 432 (8th Cir.1994); see also Bishop v. Sullivan, 900 F.2d 1259, 1262 (8th Cir.1990) (citing Polaski v. Heckler, 739 F.2d 1320 (order), supplemented, 751 F.2d 943 (8th Cir.1984), vacated, 476 U.S. 1167 , 106 S.Ct. 2885 , 90 L.Ed.2d 974 adhered to on remand, 804 F.2d 456 (8th Cir.1986), cert, denied, 482 U.S. 927 , 107 S.Ct. 3211 , 96 L.Ed.2d 698 (1987)).
green Russell v. Sullivan (1991)
Cited · E.D. Mo. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See, Polaski v. Heckler, 739 F.2d 1320 (order), supplemented, 751 F.2d 943 (8th Cir.1984), vacated, 476 U.S. 1167 , 106 S.Ct. 2885 , 90 L.Ed.2d 974 , adhered to on remand, 804 F.2d 456 (8th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 482 U.S. 927 , 107 S.Ct. 3211 , 96 L.Ed.2d 698 (1987).
Cited · N.D. Iowa · signal: accord
When evaluating a claimant’s subjective complaints, the ALJ must consider the factors set forth in Polaski v. Heckler: “(1) the claimant’s daily activities; (2) the duration, frequency and intensity of the pain; (3) dosage, effectiveness, and side effects of medication; (4) precipitating and aggravating factors; and (5) functional restrictions.”10 5 See 20 C.F.R. § 416.1481 . 6 Grindley v. Kijakazi, 9 F.4th 622, 627 (8th Cir. 2021); accord 42 U.S.C. § 405 (g). 7 Kirby v. Ast…
Cited · N.D. Iowa · signal: accord
See AR 1749. 13 Black v. Apfel, 143 F.3d 383, 386 (8th Cir. 1998); accord Polaski, 739 F.2d 1320, 1321-22 (8th Cir. 1984), vacated, 476 U.S. 1167 (1986), reinstated, 804 F.2d 456 (8th Cir. 1986).
Cited · N.D. Iowa · signal: accord
Reg. 44667 , 44671 (Aug. 26, 2019) (guidance from Social Security Administration provides that when evaluating functional limitations from headaches, “[c]onsistency and supportability between reported symptoms and objective medical evidence is key in assessing the RFC”). 13 Black v. Apfel, 143 F.3d 383, 386 (8th Cir. 1998); accord Polaski, 739 F.2d 1320, 1321-22 (8th Cir. 1984), vacated, 476 U.S. 1167 (1986), reinstated, 804 F.2d 456 (8th Cir. 1986).
Cited · N.D. Iowa · signal: accord
When evaluating a claimant’s subjective complaints— including pain or nervousness—the ALJ must consider the factors set forth in Polaski v. Heckler: “(1) the claimant’s daily activities; (2) the duration, frequency and intensity of the pain; (3) dosage, effectiveness, and side effects of medication; (4) precipitating and aggravating factors; and (5) functional restrictions.”26 “Other relevant factors include the claimant’s relevant work history and the absence of objective m…
Cited · N.D. Iowa · signal: accord
The ALJ summarized the medical evidence, commenting that Plaintiff received minimal treatment for her conditions—medication management and no referrals to any specialists.30 AR 17- 26 See DOT 075.364-010 (Nurse, General Duty). 27 See AR 36-37. 28 When evaluating the credibility of a claimant’s subjective complaints, the ALJ must consider: “(1) the claimant’s daily activities; (2) the duration, frequency and intensity of the pain; (3) dosage, effectiveness, and side effects o…
Cited · N.D. Iowa · signal: accord
Handling and Fingering When evaluating the credibility of a claimant’s subjective complaints—including pain or nervousness—the ALJ must consider the factors set forth in Polaski v. Heckler: “(1) the claimant’s daily activities; (2) the duration, frequency and intensity of the pain; (3) dosage, effectiveness, and side effects of medication; (4) precipitating and aggravating factors; and (5) functional restrictions.” Black v. Apfel, 143 F.3d 383, 386 (8th Cir. 1998); accord Po…
Cited · N.D. Iowa · signal: accord
A. Subjective Complaints When evaluating the credibility of a claimant’s subjective complaints—including pain or nervousness—the ALJ must consider the factors set forth in Polaski v. Heckler: “(1) the claimant’s daily activities; (2) the duration, frequency and intensity of the pain; (3) dosage, effectiveness, and side effects of medication; (4) precipitating and aggravating factors; and (5) functional restrictions.” Black v. Apfel, 143 F.3d 383, 386 (8th Cir. 1998); accord …
Cited · N.D. Iowa · signal: accord
When evaluating the credibility of a claimant’s subjective complaints, the ALJ must consider the factors set forth in Polaski v. Heckler: “(1) the claimant's daily activities; (2) the duration, frequency and intensity of the pain; (3) dosage, effectiveness, and side effects of medication; (4) precipitating and aggravating factors; and (5) functional restrictions.” Black v. Apfel, 143 F.3d 383, 386 (8th Cir. 1998); accord Polaski, 739 F.2d 1320 , 1321–22 (8th Cir. 1984), vaca…
Cited · N.D. Iowa · signal: accord
When evaluating the credibility of a claimant’s subjective complaints— including pain—the ALJ must consider the factors set forth in Polaski v. Heckler: “(1) the claimant’s daily activities; (2) the duration, frequency and intensity of the pain; (3) dosage, effectiveness, and side effects of medication; (4) precipitating and aggravating factors; and (5) functional restrictions.” Black v. Apfel, 143 F.3d 383, 386 (8th Cir. 1998); accord Polaski, 739 F.2d 1320, 1321-22 (8th Ci…
Cited · N.D. Iowa · signal: accord
A. Subjective Complaints When evaluating the credibility of a claimant’s subjective complaints—including pain or nervousness—the ALJ must consider the factors set forth in Polaski v. Heckler: “(1) the claimant’s daily activities; (2) the duration, frequency and intensity of the pain; (3) dosage, effectiveness, and side effects of medication; (4) precipitating and aggravating factors; and (5) functional restrictions.” Black v. Apfel, 143 F.3d 383, 386 (8th Cir. 1998); accord …