accused may prepare defense (Kansas) · Go Syfert
← Kansas issues

accused may prepare defense in Kansas

5 Kansas opinions name it 2 courts 2002–2014 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Kansas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (0)

CaseFollowedCited
No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Kansas.

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Kansas. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (2)

CaseCitedYears
State v. Hall red
kan · 1990
2 sentences

2014Moreover, an “information is sufficient if it clearly informs tire defendant of the precise offense of which he or she is accused so that the accused may prepare a defense and so that a judgment thereon will safeguard the accused from a subsequent prosecution for the same offense.” State v. Hall, 246 Kan. 728, 754 , 793 P.2d 737 (1990), oven-uled in part on other grounds Ferguson v. State, 276 Kan. 428 , 78 P.3d 40 (2003).

2014Moreover, an “information is sufficient if it clearly informs tire defendant of the precise offense of which he or she is accused so that the accused may prepare a defense and so that a judgment thereon will safeguard the accused from a subsequent prosecution for the same offense.” State v. Hall, 246 Kan. 728, 754 , 793 P.2d 737 (1990), oven-uled in part on other grounds Ferguson v. State, 276 Kan. 428 , 78 P.3d 40 (2003).

52002–2014
Ferguson v. State green
kan · 2003
2 sentences

2014Moreover, an “information is sufficient if it clearly informs tire defendant of the precise offense of which he or she is accused so that the accused may prepare a defense and so that a judgment thereon will safeguard the accused from a subsequent prosecution for the same offense.” State v. Hall, 246 Kan. 728, 754 , 793 P.2d 737 (1990), oven-uled in part on other grounds Ferguson v. State, 276 Kan. 428 , 78 P.3d 40 (2003).

2014Moreover, an “information is sufficient if it clearly informs tire defendant of the precise offense of which he or she is accused so that the accused may prepare a defense and so that a judgment thereon will safeguard the accused from a subsequent prosecution for the same offense.” State v. Hall, 246 Kan. 728, 754 , 793 P.2d 737 (1990), oven-uled in part on other grounds Ferguson v. State, 276 Kan. 428 , 78 P.3d 40 (2003).

12014–2014

Statutes the citing opinions construe

KS § K.S.A. § 22-3201 (4)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

TX 27 (1988–2025) NE 21 (1986–2026) WA 12 (1989–2025) IL 6 (1945–1990) KS 5 (2002–2014) PA 5 (1994–2025) AZ 4 (1983–2019) NJ 2 (1950–1985)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check