6 Illinois opinions name it 2 courts 1945–1990 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
People v. Reilly
green
2 sentences1973(People v. Weisman, 296 Ill. 156 ; People v. Reilly, 257 Ill. 538 .) Where, from the record, there is no question of the identity of the victim as the person named, such variance is not fatal. 1945(People v. Weisman, 296 Ill. 156 ; People v. Reilly, 257 Ill. 538 .) Where, from the record, there is no question of the identity of the victim as the person named, such variance is not fatal. | 2 | 1945–1973 |
People v. Weisman
neutral
2 sentences1973(People v. Weisman, 296 Ill. 156 ; People v. Reilly, 257 Ill. 538 .) Where, from the record, there is no question of the identity of the victim as the person named, such variance is not fatal. 1945(People v. Weisman, 296 Ill. 156 ; People v. Reilly, 257 Ill. 538 .) Where, from the record, there is no question of the identity of the victim as the person named, such variance is not fatal. | 2 | 1945–1973 |
The People v. Jankowski
green
2 sentences1959(People v. Cheney, 405 Ill. 258 ; People v. Jankowski, 391 Ill. 298 .) The facts in evidence here leave no doubt as to the identity of the person robbed, nor is it pointed out how the defendant could have been misled or prejudiced in making his defense. 1949(People v. Jankowski, 391 Ill. 298 .) The language of the indictment here is clear and explicit and apprises defendant of the exact crime with which he was charged. | 2 | 1949–1959 |
Roviaro v. United States
green
2 sentences1990Whether a proper balance renders nondisclosure erroneous must depend on the particular circumstances of each case, taking into consideration the crime charged, the possible defenses, the possible significance of the informer's testimony, and other relevant factors." ( Roviaro v. United States (1957), 353 U.S. 53, 62 , 77 S.Ct. 623, 628-29 , 1 L.Ed.2d 639, 646 , 77 S.Ct. 623, 628-29 .) Thus, disclosure of an informant's identity is ordered not for its own sake but so that an accused may prepare a defense. 1990Ed. 2d 639, 646 , 77 S. Ct. 623, 628-29 .) Thus, disclosure of an informant’s identity is ordered not for its own sake but so that an accused may prepare a defense. | 1 | 1990–1990 |
The People v. Nelson
neutral
1 sentence1968People v. Nelson, 17 Ill2d 509, 162 NE2d 390 . | 1 | 1968–1968 |
People v. Cheney
neutral
1 sentence1959(People v. Cheney, 405 Ill. 258 ; People v. Jankowski, 391 Ill. 298 .) The facts in evidence here leave no doubt as to the identity of the person robbed, nor is it pointed out how the defendant could have been misled or prejudiced in making his defense. | 1 | 1959–1959 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.