copy instruction (Kentucky) · Go Syfert
← Kentucky issues

copy instruction in Kentucky

5 Kentucky opinions name it 2 courts 1909–1946 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Kentucky courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (0)

CaseFollowedCited
No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Kentucky.

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Kentucky. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (5)

CaseCitedYears
McGraw v. Ayers green
kyctapphigh · 1933
2 sentences

1946The instruction concluded: “But unless the jury shall believe from the evidence that the said Singleton Siler was injured in and by reason of the collision between the bus on which he was a *267 passenger and the automobile mentioned in the evidence upon the occasion mentioned in the evidence, the law is for the defendant, and the jury should so find.” The instruction is a copy of instruction No. 1 given in McGraw v. Ayers, 248 Ky. 166 , 58 S. W. 2d 378 , and found in Stanley on Instructions, section 253.

1946The instruction concluded: “But unless the jury shall believe from the evidence that the said Singleton Siler was injured in and by reason of the collision between the bus on which he was a *267 passenger and the automobile mentioned in the evidence upon the occasion mentioned in the evidence, the law is for the defendant, and the jury should so find.” The instruction is a copy of instruction No. 1 given in McGraw v. Ayers, 248 Ky. 166 , 58 S. W. 2d 378 , and found in Stanley on Instructions, section 253.

11946–1946
Branson v. Commonwealth green
kyctapp · 1891
2 sentences

1929The instruction complained of is substantially the same as the instruction found in Hobson on Instructions, sec. 709, which in turn is a copy of the instruction approved in Branson v. Commonwealth, 92 Ky. 330 , 17 S. W. 1019 , 13 Ky. Law Rep. 614 .

1929The instruction complained of is substantially the same as the instruction found in Hobson on Instructions, sec. 709, which in turn is a copy of the instruction approved in Branson v. Commonwealth, 92 Ky. 330 , 17 S. W. 1019 , 13 Ky. Law Rep. 614 .

11929–1929
Fulkerson v. Akers neutral
kyctapp · 1911
1 sentence

1915The first instruction is a substantial copy of the instruction given in Fulkerson v. Akers, 145 Ky., 187 , and required Maggard, who was in charge of his automobile, to have it under reasonable control.

11915–1915
Abbott v. Commonwealth green
kyctapp · 1900
1 sentence

1912This instruction, however, is a copy of the instruction approved by this court in Abbott v. Commonwealth, 107 Ky., 624 ; and what was said there in sustaining the instruction need not he repeated here. 8.

11912–1912
Black v. McCarley's Ex'r neutral
kyctapp · 1907
2 sentences

1909The instruction given by the court is a substantial copy of the instruction approved by this court in the case of Black v. McCarley’s Ex’r, 126 Ky. 825 , 104 S. W. 987 , 31 K.

1909The instruction given by the court is a substantial copy of the instruction approved by this court in the case of Black v. McCarley’s Ex’r, 126 Ky. 825 , 104 S. W. 987 , 31 K.

11909–1909

Where else courts name it

NY 57 (1800–2026) GA 25 (1883–2020) CA 24 (1918–2025) FL 22 (1936–2026) PA 17 (1924–2026) IL 16 (1892–2022) TX 13 (1942–2025) OH 11 (1895–2026) NJ 9 (1950–2025) LA 8 (1911–2018) MI 8 (1919–2026) AL 7 (1870–2012) MO 7 (1894–1978) IN 7 (1912–2020) AR 6 (1924–2016) NM 5 (1952–2018) IA 5 (1891–2016) KY 5 (1909–1946) SC 4 (1918–1985) MD 4 (1984–2005) WA 4 (1942–2013) TN 4 (1950–2018) OK 3 (1930–1997) CO 3 (2011–2022) MN 3 (1990–2025) ID 3 (1950–2012) CT 3 (1966–1995) NE 3 (1907–2023) DC 3 (2003–2025) ME 2 (2015–2017) WI 2 (1939–2019) NC 2 (2021–2021) KS 2 (1978–2021) VA 2 (2020–2024) MA 2 (1995–2024)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check