5 Massachusetts opinions name it 2 courts 1997–2025 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Massachusetts courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Commonwealth v. Fahertygreen1 sentence2025"When reviewing the denial of a motion for a required finding of not guilty, 'we consider the evidence introduced at trial in the light most favorable to the Commonwealth, and determine whether a rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.'" Commonwealth v. Quinones, 95 Mass. App. Ct. 156, 162 (2019), quoting Commonwealth v. Faherty, 93 Mass. App. Ct. 129, 133 (2018). | 1 | 1 |
Commonwealth v. Quinonesgreen1 sentence2025"When reviewing the denial of a motion for a required finding of not guilty, 'we consider the evidence introduced at trial in the light most favorable to the Commonwealth, and determine whether a rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.'" Commonwealth v. Quinones, 95 Mass. App. Ct. 156, 162 (2019), quoting Commonwealth v. Faherty, 93 Mass. App. Ct. 129, 133 (2018). | 1 | 1 |
Almeida v. Arrudagreen1 sentence2023See Almeida, 89 Mass. App. Ct. at 246 (second prong satisfied where judge found that beer and wine sales "would not predominate," but "operate as an adjunct" to grocery sales). | 1 | 1 |
Commonwealth v. Ferreiragreen1 sentence2019Cf. Commonwealth v. Ferreira, 70 Mass. App. Ct. 32, 35 (2007) (defendant convicted of negligent operation for driving in shopping center parking lot). | 1 | 1 |
Carey v. New Yorker of Worcester, Inc.green1 sentence1997It owed a duty to a paying patron to use reasonable care to prevent injury to him by third persons whether their acts were accidental, negligent or intentional.” Carey v. New Yorker of Worcester, Inc., 355 Mass. 450, 452 (1969). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Massachusetts. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Steele v. Kelley
green
1 sentence1999With the foregoing preliminary remarks in mind, and with a full awareness of the teachings for this case in particular contained in Steele v. Kelley, 46 Mass.App.Ct. 712 (1999), the Court now will assess and rule on the claims of each of the counts of Steele’s second amended complaint that remain for determination. 11 Count I — Accounting The first count prays that the Court order Kelley to account to the beneficiaries for all actions taken by him since he became trustee of the CCT. | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.