5 Maryland opinions name it 2 courts 2010–2026 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Maryland courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Lee v. Stategreen2 sentences2026See, e.g., Danshin, 491 Md. at 541-50 (analyzing whether some evidence as to each element of the defense of others defense was adduced using both self-defense and defense of others cases as guidance); Lee, 193 Md. 2026See, e.g., Danshin, 491 Md. at 541-50 (analyzing whether some evidence as to each element of the defense of others defense was adduced using both self-defense and defense of others cases as guidance); Lee, 193 Md. | 2 | 2 |
Belton & Worsley v. Stategreen1 sentence2026Indeed, the trial court extensively discussed Belton v. State for the proposition that: if two are engaged unlawfully in a mutual fight (deadly or nondeadly) the law does not authorize anyone (close relative or stranger) to take sides in the contest and aid in the effort to overcome his adversary . . . [o]bviously, the law does not authorize anyone to join forces with the offender and aid in harming the innocent victim. 253 Md. | 1 | 1 |
Sims v. Stategreen1 sentence2025First, Mr. Danshin contends that a defendant may receive the instruction even when they simultaneously deny being the shooter, i.e., that a defendant may put forth inconsistent defenses, claiming support from our holding in Sims v. State, 319 Md. 540, 550 (1990). | 1 | 1 |
Mora v. Stategreen2 sentences2014See, e.g., Black v. State, 426 Md. 328, 337 , 44 A.3d 362 (2012) (“Appellant or petitioner has the burden of producing a sufficient factual record for the appellate court to determine whether error was committed.”); Mora v. State, 355 Md. 639, 649-50 , 735 A.2d 1122 (1999) (“It is incumbent upon the appellant claiming error to produce a sufficient factual record for the appellate court to determine whether error was committed.”). 2014See, e.g., Black v. State, 426 Md. 328, 337 , 44 A.3d 362 (2012) (“Appellant or petitioner has the burden of producing a sufficient factual record for the appellate court to determine whether error was committed.”); Mora v. State, 355 Md. 639, 649-50 , 735 A.2d 1122 (1999) (“It is incumbent upon the appellant claiming error to produce a sufficient factual record for the appellate court to determine whether error was committed.”). | 1 | 1 |
Black v. Stategreen2 sentences2014See, e.g., Black v. State, 426 Md. 328, 337 , 44 A.3d 362 (2012) (“Appellant or petitioner has the burden of producing a sufficient factual record for the appellate court to determine whether error was committed.”); Mora v. State, 355 Md. 639, 649-50 , 735 A.2d 1122 (1999) (“It is incumbent upon the appellant claiming error to produce a sufficient factual record for the appellate court to determine whether error was committed.”). 2014See, e.g., Black v. State, 426 Md. 328, 337 , 44 A.3d 362 (2012) (“Appellant or petitioner has the burden of producing a sufficient factual record for the appellate court to determine whether error was committed.”); Mora v. State, 355 Md. 639, 649-50 , 735 A.2d 1122 (1999) (“It is incumbent upon the appellant claiming error to produce a sufficient factual record for the appellate court to determine whether error was committed.”). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Maryland. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Jarvis v. State
green
1 sentence2025Id. | 1 | 2025–2025 |
Tucker v. State
green
2 sentences2012Tucker v. State, 407 Md. 368, 379 , 965 A.2d 900 (2009). 2012Tucker v. State, 407 Md. 368, 379 , 965 A.2d 900 (2009). | 1 | 2012–2012 |
Guerriero v. State
green
2 sentences2010In Guerriero v. State, 213 Md. 545 , 132 A.2d 466 (1957), the Court of Appeals considered whether the trial judge, sitting as the trier of fact, erred in finding a defendant guilty of assault, rejecting a defense of others defense. 2010In Guerriero v. State, 213 Md. 545 , 132 A.2d 466 (1957), the Court of Appeals considered whether the trial judge, sitting as the trier of fact, erred in finding a defendant guilty of assault, rejecting a defense of others defense. | 1 | 2010–2010 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.