judge-made doctrine (Maryland) · Go Syfert
← Maryland issues

judge-made doctrine in Maryland

5 Maryland opinions name it 2 courts 1995–2026 1 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Maryland courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (0)

CaseFollowedCited
No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Maryland.

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Maryland. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (6)

CaseCitedYears
Thornhill v. Alabama green
scotus · 1940
2 sentences

2000Normally, a litigant only has standing to vindicate his own constitutional rights, and he cannot challenge a statute on the ground that it might be applied unconstitutionally to other persons and in other situations not before the court. [4] Members of City Council v. Taxpayers for Vincent, 466 U.S. 789, 797-99 , 104 S.Ct. 2118, 2124-25 , 80 L.Ed.2d 772 (1984) (citing Broadrick v. Oklahoma, 413 U.S. 601, 612 , 93 S.Ct. 2908, 2916 , 37 L.Ed.2d 830 (1973); Thornhill v. Alabama, 310 U.S. 88, 104 , 60 S.Ct. 736, 745 , 84 L.Ed. 1093 (1940)).

2000Normally, a litigant only has standing to vindicate his own constitutional rights, and he cannot challenge a statute on the ground that it might be applied unconstitutionally to other persons and in other situations not before the court. [4] Members of City Council v. Taxpayers for Vincent, 466 U.S. 789, 797-99 , 104 S.Ct. 2118, 2124-25 , 80 L.Ed.2d 772 (1984) (citing Broadrick v. Oklahoma, 413 U.S. 601, 612 , 93 S.Ct. 2908, 2916 , 37 L.Ed.2d 830 (1973); Thornhill v. Alabama, 310 U.S. 88, 104 , 60 S.Ct. 736, 745 , 84 L.Ed. 1093 (1940)).

22000–2000
Broadrick v. Oklahoma green
scotus · 1973
2 sentences

2000Normally, a litigant only has standing to vindicate his own constitutional rights, and he cannot challenge a statute on the ground that it might be applied unconstitutionally to other persons and in other situations not before the court. [4] Members of City Council v. Taxpayers for Vincent, 466 U.S. 789, 797-99 , 104 S.Ct. 2118, 2124-25 , 80 L.Ed.2d 772 (1984) (citing Broadrick v. Oklahoma, 413 U.S. 601, 612 , 93 S.Ct. 2908, 2916 , 37 L.Ed.2d 830 (1973); Thornhill v. Alabama, 310 U.S. 88, 104 , 60 S.Ct. 736, 745 , 84 L.Ed. 1093 (1940)).

2000Normally, a litigant only has standing to vindicate his own constitutional rights, and he cannot challenge a statute on the ground that it might be applied unconstitutionally to other persons and in other situations not before the court. [4] Members of City Council v. Taxpayers for Vincent, 466 U.S. 789, 797-99 , 104 S.Ct. 2118, 2124-25 , 80 L.Ed.2d 772 (1984) (citing Broadrick v. Oklahoma, 413 U.S. 601, 612 , 93 S.Ct. 2908, 2916 , 37 L.Ed.2d 830 (1973); Thornhill v. Alabama, 310 U.S. 88, 104 , 60 S.Ct. 736, 745 , 84 L.Ed. 1093 (1940)).

22000–2000
Members of the City Council of Los Angeles v. Taxpayers for Vincent green
scotus · 1984
2 sentences

2000Normally, a litigant only has standing to vindicate his own constitutional rights, and he cannot challenge a statute on the ground that it might be applied unconstitutionally to other persons and in other situations not before the court. [4] Members of City Council v. Taxpayers for Vincent, 466 U.S. 789, 797-99 , 104 S.Ct. 2118, 2124-25 , 80 L.Ed.2d 772 (1984) (citing Broadrick v. Oklahoma, 413 U.S. 601, 612 , 93 S.Ct. 2908, 2916 , 37 L.Ed.2d 830 (1973); Thornhill v. Alabama, 310 U.S. 88, 104 , 60 S.Ct. 736, 745 , 84 L.Ed. 1093 (1940)).

2000Normally, a litigant only has standing to vindicate his own constitutional rights, and he cannot challenge a statute on the ground that it might be applied unconstitutionally to other persons and in other situations not before the court. [4] Members of City Council v. Taxpayers for Vincent, 466 U.S. 789, 797-99 , 104 S.Ct. 2118, 2124-25 , 80 L.Ed.2d 772 (1984) (citing Broadrick v. Oklahoma, 413 U.S. 601, 612 , 93 S.Ct. 2908, 2916 , 37 L.Ed.2d 830 (1973); Thornhill v. Alabama, 310 U.S. 88, 104 , 60 S.Ct. 736, 745 , 84 L.Ed. 1093 (1940)).

22000–2000
United States v. Calandra green
scotus · 1974
1 sentence

2026United States v. Calandra, 414 U.S. 338 , 347–48 (1974).

12026–2026
Hill v. United States green
scotus · 1962
2 sentences

2010Id. at 425 , 82 S.Ct. at 469-70 , 7 L.Ed.2d at 419 .

2010Id. at 425 , 82 S.Ct. at 469-70 , 7 L.Ed.2d at 419 .

12010–2010
Williams v. State green
md · 1990
2 sentences

1995Id. at 268 , 582 A.2d 803 .

1995Id. at 268 , 582 A.2d 803 .

11995–1995

Where else courts name it

CA 55 (1936–2026) TN 40 (1977–2025) PA 18 (1930–2024) NC 16 (1932–2022) MA 13 (1955–2025) MI 12 (1962–2021) TX 12 (1982–2025) OH 12 (1985–2022) CO 11 (1975–2026) FL 11 (1971–2022) IL 11 (1970–2021) NJ 10 (1933–2026) NY 9 (1972–2024) OR 8 (1944–2017) UT 8 (1991–2021) WA 8 (1992–2021) DC 7 (1996–2020) WI 7 (1984–2008) DE 6 (1968–2024) MD 5 (1995–2026) IA 5 (1969–2019) HI 4 (1968–2001) VA 4 (1987–2016) GA 3 (1997–2025) AR 3 (1997–1998) KS 3 (1996–2020) AZ 3 (2001–2014) ME 3 (1982–2001) SD 3 (1992–1997) MO 3 (2004–2021) IN 3 (1975–1991) SC 3 (1970–2000) AL 2 (1982–2014) WV 2 (2018–2023) MN 2 (1954–2000) NV 2 (1982–2018)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check