5 Maryland opinions name it 2 courts 1995–2026 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Maryland courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Maryland. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Maryland. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Thornhill v. Alabama
green
2 sentences2000Normally, a litigant only has standing to vindicate his own constitutional rights, and he cannot challenge a statute on the ground that it might be applied unconstitutionally to other persons and in other situations not before the court. [4] Members of City Council v. Taxpayers for Vincent, 466 U.S. 789, 797-99 , 104 S.Ct. 2118, 2124-25 , 80 L.Ed.2d 772 (1984) (citing Broadrick v. Oklahoma, 413 U.S. 601, 612 , 93 S.Ct. 2908, 2916 , 37 L.Ed.2d 830 (1973); Thornhill v. Alabama, 310 U.S. 88, 104 , 60 S.Ct. 736, 745 , 84 L.Ed. 1093 (1940)). 2000Normally, a litigant only has standing to vindicate his own constitutional rights, and he cannot challenge a statute on the ground that it might be applied unconstitutionally to other persons and in other situations not before the court. [4] Members of City Council v. Taxpayers for Vincent, 466 U.S. 789, 797-99 , 104 S.Ct. 2118, 2124-25 , 80 L.Ed.2d 772 (1984) (citing Broadrick v. Oklahoma, 413 U.S. 601, 612 , 93 S.Ct. 2908, 2916 , 37 L.Ed.2d 830 (1973); Thornhill v. Alabama, 310 U.S. 88, 104 , 60 S.Ct. 736, 745 , 84 L.Ed. 1093 (1940)). | 2 | 2000–2000 |
Broadrick v. Oklahoma
green
2 sentences2000Normally, a litigant only has standing to vindicate his own constitutional rights, and he cannot challenge a statute on the ground that it might be applied unconstitutionally to other persons and in other situations not before the court. [4] Members of City Council v. Taxpayers for Vincent, 466 U.S. 789, 797-99 , 104 S.Ct. 2118, 2124-25 , 80 L.Ed.2d 772 (1984) (citing Broadrick v. Oklahoma, 413 U.S. 601, 612 , 93 S.Ct. 2908, 2916 , 37 L.Ed.2d 830 (1973); Thornhill v. Alabama, 310 U.S. 88, 104 , 60 S.Ct. 736, 745 , 84 L.Ed. 1093 (1940)). 2000Normally, a litigant only has standing to vindicate his own constitutional rights, and he cannot challenge a statute on the ground that it might be applied unconstitutionally to other persons and in other situations not before the court. [4] Members of City Council v. Taxpayers for Vincent, 466 U.S. 789, 797-99 , 104 S.Ct. 2118, 2124-25 , 80 L.Ed.2d 772 (1984) (citing Broadrick v. Oklahoma, 413 U.S. 601, 612 , 93 S.Ct. 2908, 2916 , 37 L.Ed.2d 830 (1973); Thornhill v. Alabama, 310 U.S. 88, 104 , 60 S.Ct. 736, 745 , 84 L.Ed. 1093 (1940)). | 2 | 2000–2000 |
Members of the City Council of Los Angeles v. Taxpayers for Vincent
green
2 sentences2000Normally, a litigant only has standing to vindicate his own constitutional rights, and he cannot challenge a statute on the ground that it might be applied unconstitutionally to other persons and in other situations not before the court. [4] Members of City Council v. Taxpayers for Vincent, 466 U.S. 789, 797-99 , 104 S.Ct. 2118, 2124-25 , 80 L.Ed.2d 772 (1984) (citing Broadrick v. Oklahoma, 413 U.S. 601, 612 , 93 S.Ct. 2908, 2916 , 37 L.Ed.2d 830 (1973); Thornhill v. Alabama, 310 U.S. 88, 104 , 60 S.Ct. 736, 745 , 84 L.Ed. 1093 (1940)). 2000Normally, a litigant only has standing to vindicate his own constitutional rights, and he cannot challenge a statute on the ground that it might be applied unconstitutionally to other persons and in other situations not before the court. [4] Members of City Council v. Taxpayers for Vincent, 466 U.S. 789, 797-99 , 104 S.Ct. 2118, 2124-25 , 80 L.Ed.2d 772 (1984) (citing Broadrick v. Oklahoma, 413 U.S. 601, 612 , 93 S.Ct. 2908, 2916 , 37 L.Ed.2d 830 (1973); Thornhill v. Alabama, 310 U.S. 88, 104 , 60 S.Ct. 736, 745 , 84 L.Ed. 1093 (1940)). | 2 | 2000–2000 |
United States v. Calandra
green
1 sentence2026United States v. Calandra, 414 U.S. 338 , 347–48 (1974). | 1 | 2026–2026 |
Hill v. United States
green
2 sentences2010Id. at 425 , 82 S.Ct. at 469-70 , 7 L.Ed.2d at 419 . 2010Id. at 425 , 82 S.Ct. at 469-70 , 7 L.Ed.2d at 419 . | 1 | 2010–2010 |
Williams v. State
green
2 sentences1995Id. at 268 , 582 A.2d 803 . 1995Id. at 268 , 582 A.2d 803 . | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.