5 Michigan opinions name it 2 courts 1985–2018 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Michigan courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
People v. Swinfordgreen2 sentences1989See also People v Swinford, 150 Mich App 507, 514-515 ; 389 NW2d 462 (1986), lv den 426 Mich 861 (1986). 1989See also People v Swinford, 150 Mich App 507, 514-515 ; 389 NW2d 462 (1986), lv den 426 Mich 861 (1986). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Michigan. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
People v. Dupree
green
2 sentences2018People v Dupree, 486 Mich 693, 702 ; 788 NW2d 399 (2010). 2018People v Dupree, 486 Mich 693, 702 ; 788 NW2d 399 (2010). | 2 | 2018–2018 |
People v. Burnett
green
2 sentences1992People v Burnett, 166 Mich App 741, 757 ; 421 NW2d 278 (1988). v We vacate the circuit court’s order granting defendant relief from judgment and a new trial and instruct the court to reinstate defendant’s convictions and sentences for all three offenses. 1992People v Burnett, 166 Mich App 741, 757 ; 421 NW2d 278 (1988). v We vacate the circuit court’s order granting defendant relief from judgment and a new trial and instruct the court to reinstate defendant’s convictions and sentences for all three offenses. | 1 | 1992–1992 |
People v. Dupie
green
2 sentences1985The report in that case does not state the nature of the claimed instructional error. [15] The majority cites People v Dupie, 395 Mich 483, 488 ; 236 NW2d 494 (1975), where the trial court had instructed the jury that to convict the defendant of unarmed robbery it "must appear that the defendant feloniously ... stole...." The defendant contended the the word "feloniously" did not adequately instruct the jury on specific intent. 1985The report in that case does not state the nature of the claimed instructional error. [15] The majority cites People v Dupie, 395 Mich 483, 488 ; 236 NW2d 494 (1975), where the trial court had instructed the jury that to convict the defendant of unarmed robbery it "must appear that the defendant feloniously ... stole...." The defendant contended the the word "feloniously" did not adequately instruct the jury on specific intent. | 1 | 1985–1985 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.