5 Michigan opinions name it 2 courts 1916–2015 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Michigan courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
In Re Erickson Estategreen2 sentences2015Kalamazoo Co Rd Comm'rs v Bera, 373 Mich 310, 314 ; 129 NW2d 427 (1964) (quotation marks and citation omitted); see also In re Erickson Estate, 202 Mich App 329, 333 ; 508 NW2d 181 (1993) (“Where there is evidence pro and con [regarding an individual’s mental capacity], much -3- weight should ordinarily be given to the conclusion reached by the probate judge, who has had the opportunity of seeing and hearing the witnesses.”). 2015Kalamazoo Co Rd Comm'rs v Bera, 373 Mich 310, 314 ; 129 NW2d 427 (1964) (quotation marks and citation omitted); see also In re Erickson Estate, 202 Mich App 329, 333 ; 508 NW2d 181 (1993) (“Where there is evidence pro and con [regarding an individual’s mental capacity], much -3- weight should ordinarily be given to the conclusion reached by the probate judge, who has had the opportunity of seeing and hearing the witnesses.”). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Michigan. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Grand Lodge, Ancient Order of United Workmen v. Brown
neutral
2 sentences1993Grand Lodge, supra at 445 . 1993Grand Lodge, supra at 445 . | 3 | 1916–1993 |
Kalamazoo County Road Commissioners v. Bera
green
2 sentences2015Kalamazoo Co Rd Comm'rs v Bera, 373 Mich 310, 314 ; 129 NW2d 427 (1964) (quotation marks and citation omitted); see also In re Erickson Estate, 202 Mich App 329, 333 ; 508 NW2d 181 (1993) (“Where there is evidence pro and con [regarding an individual’s mental capacity], much -3- weight should ordinarily be given to the conclusion reached by the probate judge, who has had the opportunity of seeing and hearing the witnesses.”). 2015Kalamazoo Co Rd Comm'rs v Bera, 373 Mich 310, 314 ; 129 NW2d 427 (1964) (quotation marks and citation omitted); see also In re Erickson Estate, 202 Mich App 329, 333 ; 508 NW2d 181 (1993) (“Where there is evidence pro and con [regarding an individual’s mental capacity], much -3- weight should ordinarily be given to the conclusion reached by the probate judge, who has had the opportunity of seeing and hearing the witnesses.”). | 1 | 2015–2015 |
In Re Littlejohn's Estate
green
1 sentence1950He felt that the facts in the instant case were comparable to those in Re Littlejohn’s Estate, 239 Mich 630 . | 1 | 1950–1950 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.