opportunity of seeing hearing (New Jersey) · Go Syfert
← New Jersey issues

opportunity of seeing hearing in New Jersey

9 New Jersey opinions name it 1 courts 1992–2025 6 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by New Jersey courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (2)

CaseFollowedCited
Gellert v. Livingstongreen
nj · 1950 · cited in 9 New Jersey opinions naming this issue, 1992–2025
2 sentences

2025"The findings of the trial court on the issues of testamentary capacity and undue influence, though not controlling, are entitled to great weight since the trial court had the opportunity of seeing and hearing the witnesses and forming an opinion as to the credibility of their testimony." Gellert v. Livingston, 5 N.J. 65, 78 (1950).

2025Further, "[t]he findings of the trial court on the issues of testamentary capacity and undue influence, though not controlling, are entitled to great weight A-1838-22 4 since the trial court had the opportunity of seeing and hearing the witnesses and forming an opinion as to the credibility of their testimony." Gellert v. Livingston, 5 N.J. 65, 78 (1950).

89
Matter of Will of Lieblgreen
njsuperctappdiv · 1992 · cited in 6 New Jersey opinions naming this issue, 2017–2025
2 sentences

2021A-3890-18 8 the trial court had the opportunity of seeing and hearing the witnesses and forming an opinion as to the credibility of their testimony." In re Will of Liebl, 260 N.J.

2018Post-trial fact findings "are entitled to great weight [on appeal] since the trial court had the opportunity of seeing and hearing the witnesses and forming an opinion as to the credibility of their testimony." In re Will of Liebl, 260 N.J.

66

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New Jersey. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (5)

CaseCitedYears
State v. Modell green
nj · 1993
1 sentence

2017Super. 519, 523 (App. Div. 1992), (quoting Gellert v. Livingston, 5 N.J. 65, 78 (1950)), certif. denied, 133 N.J. 432 (1993).

12017–2017
Dolson v. Anastasia green
nj · 1969
2 sentences

1992Super. 323, 328 , 91 A. 2d 155 (App.Div. 1952), certif. denied, 11 N.J. 211 , 93 A. 2d 819 (1953). *524 Cf. Dolson v. Anastasia, 55 N.J. 2, 6-7 , 258 A. 2d 706 (1969).

1992Super. 323, 328 , 91 A. 2d 155 (App.Div. 1952), certif. denied, 11 N.J. 211 , 93 A. 2d 819 (1953). *524 Cf. Dolson v. Anastasia, 55 N.J. 2, 6-7 , 258 A. 2d 706 (1969).

11992–1992
Hoover v. Hoover neutral
nj · 1953
1 sentence

1992Super. 323, 328 , 91 A. 2d 155 (App.Div. 1952), certif. denied, 11 N.J. 211 , 93 A. 2d 819 (1953). *524 Cf. Dolson v. Anastasia, 55 N.J. 2, 6-7 , 258 A. 2d 706 (1969).

11992–1992
Moore v. Schultz neutral
nj · 1953
1 sentence

1992Super. 323, 328 , 91 A. 2d 155 (App.Div. 1952), certif. denied, 11 N.J. 211 , 93 A. 2d 819 (1953). *524 Cf. Dolson v. Anastasia, 55 N.J. 2, 6-7 , 258 A. 2d 706 (1969).

11992–1992
In Re Hoover green
njsuperctappdiv · 1952
2 sentences

1992Additionally, we point out that "[t]he findings of the trial court on the issues of testamentary capacity and undue influence, though not controlling, are entitled to great weight since the trial court had the opportunity of seeing and hearing the witnesses and forming an opinion as to the credibility of their testimony." Gellert v. Livingston, 5 N.J. 65, 78 , 73 A. 2d 916 (1950); In re Hoover, 21 N.J.

1992Super. 323, 328 , 91 A. 2d 155 (App.Div. 1952), certif. denied, 11 N.J. 211 , 93 A. 2d 819 (1953). *524 Cf. Dolson v. Anastasia, 55 N.J. 2, 6-7 , 258 A. 2d 706 (1969).

11992–1992

Where else courts name it

VA 88 (1985–2026) FL 11 (1909–1965) NJ 9 (1992–2025) PA 6 (1937–1971) MI 5 (1916–2015) CT 5 (1932–1962) CA 3 (1947–1974) IL 2 (1943–1971) RI 2 (1914–1996) AL 2 (1922–1966) MA 2 (1936–1939)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check