compulsory process clause in North Carolina

5 North Carolina opinions name it 2 courts 1983–2025 1 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by North Carolina courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (7)

Case	Followed	Cited
State v. Tindallgreen nc · 1978 · cited in 1 North Carolina opinions naming this issue, 2025–2025 1 sentence 2025In State v. Tindall, the defendant brought a similar compulsory process challenge to a statute governing material witness orders. 294 N.C. 689, 698 (1978).	1	1
State v. Greenegreen nc · 2007 · cited in 1 North Carolina opinions naming this issue, 2008–2008 2 sentences 2008App. 281, 283 , 650 S.E.2d 656, 658 (“[T]he United States Supreme Court has consistently held that a defendant’s absolute right to testify is an inherent part of both the due process requirements of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments and the compulsory process clause of the Sixth Amendment.”), appeal dismissed and disc. review denied, 362 N.C. 89 , 656 S.E.2d 280 (2007). 2008See also State v. Colson, 186 N.C.App. 281, 283 , 650 S.E.2d 656, 658 ("[T]he United States Supreme Court has consistently held that a defendant's absolute right to testify is an inherent part of both the due process requirements of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments and the compulsory process clause of the Sixth Amendment."), appeal dismissed and disc. review denied, 362 N.C. 89 , 656 S.E.2d 280 (2007).	1	1
State v. Colsongreen nc · 2007 · cited in 1 North Carolina opinions naming this issue, 2008–2008 2 sentences 2008App. 281, 283 , 650 S.E.2d 656, 658 (“[T]he United States Supreme Court has consistently held that a defendant’s absolute right to testify is an inherent part of both the due process requirements of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments and the compulsory process clause of the Sixth Amendment.”), appeal dismissed and disc. review denied, 362 N.C. 89 , 656 S.E.2d 280 (2007). 2008See also State v. Colson, 186 N.C.App. 281, 283 , 650 S.E.2d 656, 658 ("[T]he United States Supreme Court has consistently held that a defendant's absolute right to testify is an inherent part of both the due process requirements of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments and the compulsory process clause of the Sixth Amendment."), appeal dismissed and disc. review denied, 362 N.C. 89 , 656 S.E.2d 280 (2007).	1	1
State v. Colsongreen ncctapp · 2007 · cited in 1 North Carolina opinions naming this issue, 2008–2008 2 sentences 2008See also State v. Colson, 186 N.C.App. 281, 283 , 650 S.E.2d 656, 658 ("[T]he United States Supreme Court has consistently held that a defendant's absolute right to testify is an inherent part of both the due process requirements of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments and the compulsory process clause of the Sixth Amendment."), appeal dismissed and disc. review denied, 362 N.C. 89 , 656 S.E.2d 280 (2007). 2008See also State v. Colson, 186 N.C.App. 281, 283 , 650 S.E.2d 656, 658 ("[T]he United States Supreme Court has consistently held that a defendant's absolute right to testify is an inherent part of both the due process requirements of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments and the compulsory process clause of the Sixth Amendment."), appeal dismissed and disc. review denied, 362 N.C. 89 , 656 S.E.2d 280 (2007).	1	1
Faretta v. Californiagreen scotus · 1975 · cited in 1 North Carolina opinions naming this issue, 2007–2007 2 sentences 2007See, e.g., Faretta v. California, 422 U.S. 806, 819, n.15 , 284 45 L. 2007See, e.g., Faretta v. California, 422 U.S. 806, 819, n.15 , 284 45 L.	1	1
United States v. Daniel Bifieldgreen ca2 · 1983 · cited in 1 North Carolina opinions naming this issue, 1983–1983 2 sentences 1983See, e.g., United States v. Bifield, 702 F. 2d 342 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 103 S.Ct. 2095 , 77 L.Ed. 2d 304 (1983); Alicea v. Gagnon, 675 F. 2d 913 (7th Cir. 1982); United States ex rel Wilcox v. Johnson, 555 F. 2d 115 (3d Cir. 1977). 1983See, e.g., United States v. Bifield, 702 F.2d 342 (2d Cir.), cert, denied, ___ U.S.___, 103 S.Ct. 2095 , 77 L.Ed.2d 304 (1983); Alicea v. Gagnon, 675 F.2d 913 (7th Cir.1982); United States ex rel.	1	1
Williams v. United Statesgreen scotus · 1983 · cited in 1 North Carolina opinions naming this issue, 1983–1983 2 sentences 1983See, e.g., United States v. Bifield, 702 F.2d 342 (2d Cir.), cert, denied, ___ U.S.___, 103 S.Ct. 2095 , 77 L.Ed.2d 304 (1983); Alicea v. Gagnon, 675 F.2d 913 (7th Cir.1982); United States ex rel. 1983See, e.g., United States v. Bifield, 702 F.2d 342 (2d Cir.), cert, denied, ___ U.S.___, 103 S.Ct. 2095 , 77 L.Ed.2d 304 (1983); Alicea v. Gagnon, 675 F.2d 913 (7th Cir.1982); United States ex rel.	1	1

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

Case	Negative	Cited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in North Carolina. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (3)

Case	Cited	Years
Washington v. Texas green scotus · 1967 2 sentences 1985Washington v. Texas, 388 U.S. 14 , 87 S.Ct. 1920 , 18 L.Ed. 2d 1019 (1967). 1985Washington v. Texas, 388 U.S. 14 , 87 S.Ct. 1920 , 18 L.Ed. 2d 1019 (1967).	1	1985–1985
Luis Albert Alicea v. John R. Gagnon, Superintendent, and the Attorney General of Wisconsin green ca7 · 1982 2 sentences 1983See, e.g., United States v. Bifield, 702 F. 2d 342 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 103 S.Ct. 2095 , 77 L.Ed. 2d 304 (1983); Alicea v. Gagnon, 675 F. 2d 913 (7th Cir. 1982); United States ex rel Wilcox v. Johnson, 555 F. 2d 115 (3d Cir. 1977). 1983See, e.g., United States v. Bifield, 702 F.2d 342 (2d Cir.), cert, denied, ___ U.S.___, 103 S.Ct. 2095 , 77 L.Ed.2d 304 (1983); Alicea v. Gagnon, 675 F.2d 913 (7th Cir.1982); United States ex rel.	1	1983–1983
United States v. Johnson green ca3 · 1977 1 sentence 1983See, e.g., United States v. Bifield, 702 F. 2d 342 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 103 S.Ct. 2095 , 77 L.Ed. 2d 304 (1983); Alicea v. Gagnon, 675 F. 2d 913 (7th Cir. 1982); United States ex rel Wilcox v. Johnson, 555 F. 2d 115 (3d Cir. 1977).	1	1983–1983

Where else courts name it

CA 21 (1982–2025) OR 17 (1954–2022) WA 15 (1981–2025) IL 14 (1981–2014) TX 12 (1983–2022) LA 11 (1981–2017) CT 11 (1989–2025) MA 11 (1978–2015) MD 10 (1983–2017) PA 8 (1979–1992) WI 8 (1989–2025) ID 8 (1985–2024) CO 7 (1986–2004) WV 6 (1987–2020) IN 6 (2006–2011) NH 6 (1978–1997) AZ 5 (1988–2024) WY 5 (1990–2017) NC 5 (1983–2025) NJ 5 (1978–1990) FL 4 (1984–2025) NM 3 (1988–1990) HI 3 (1980–2013) NV 3 (1989–2016) OK 3 (1992–2020) VA 3 (1996–2002) RI 2 (1989–1995) MO 2 (1994–1997) MS 2 (2007–2007) DE 2 (1984–1986) ND 2 (1982–1992) MI 2 (1982–1986) DC 2 (1986–1987) AK 2 (1977–2008) ME 2 (2000–2003) NE 2 (1993–2020)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check