5 Texas opinions name it 1 courts 1997–2009 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Jackson v. Stategreen2 sentences2009Cf. Jackson , 989 S.W.2d at 846 ("there is no evidence in the record reflecting sentences imposed for similar offenses on criminals in Texas or other jurisdictions by which to make a comparison"). 2009Cf. Jackson, 989 S.W.2d at 846 ("there is no evidence in the record reflecting sentences imposed for similar offenses on criminals in Texas or other jurisdictions by which to make a comparison"). | 4 | 4 |
Williamson v. Stategreen2 sentences2009A motion for new trial is an appropriate way to preserve this type of claim for review. (1) See Williamson v. State , 175 S.W.3d 522, 523-24 (Tex. App.--Texarkana 2005, no pet.); Delacruz v. State , 167 S.W.3d 904 (Tex. App.--Texarkana 2005, no pet.). 2009A motion for new trial is an appropriate way to preserve this type of claim for review.1 See Williamson v. State, 175 S.W.3d 522 , 523–24 (Tex. App.—Texarkana 2005, no pet.); Delacruz v. State, 167 S.W.3d 904 (Tex. App.—Texarkana 2005, no pet.). | 2 | 4 |
Dallas & Wichita R. R. Co. v. Spikergreen1 sentence1997See Culberson, 5 S.W. at 821 and Spiker, 59 Tex. at 436-437 ; Whatley, 76 S.W. at 590. [26] Presumably it was not included in Abel's motion because the release contains the following language: Plaintiffs expressly reserve their cause of action against nurse M. | 1 | 1 |
East Line & Red River Railway Co. v. Culbersongreen1 sentence1997See Culberson, 5 S.W. at 821 and Spiker, 59 Tex. at 436-437 ; Whatley, 76 S.W. at 590. [26] Presumably it was not included in Abel's motion because the release contains the following language: Plaintiffs expressly reserve their cause of action against nurse M. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Delacruz v. State
green
2 sentences2009A motion for new trial is an appropriate way to preserve this type of claim for review. (1) See Williamson v. State , 175 S.W.3d 522, 523-24 (Tex. App.--Texarkana 2005, no pet.); Delacruz v. State , 167 S.W.3d 904 (Tex. App.--Texarkana 2005, no pet.). 2009A motion for new trial is an appropriate way to preserve this type of claim for review.1 See Williamson v. State, 175 S.W.3d 522 , 523–24 (Tex. App.—Texarkana 2005, no pet.); Delacruz v. State, 167 S.W.3d 904 (Tex. App.—Texarkana 2005, no pet.). | 4 | 2009–2009 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.