5 Texas opinions name it 1 courts 2003–2015 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Currie v. International Telecharge, Inc.green2 sentences2015See id. order deprived the trial court of jurisdiction over the subject matter of the appealed order, so that all B. 2003See id. | 3 | 3 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Texas Department of Transportation v. Sefzik
green
2 sentences2013The “real substance”9 of Ahmed’s claim for declaratory relief complains of Dove’s exercise of his discretion, not “nondiscretionary acts unauthorized by law.” Sefzik, 355 S.W.3d at 621 . 2013The "real substance" of Ahmed's claim for declaratory relief complains of Dove's exercise of his discretion, not "nondiscretionary acts unauthorized by law." Sefzik, 355 S.W.3d at 621 . | 2 | 2013–2013 |
Wade v. Anderson
green
1 sentence2015Wade v. Anderson, 602 S.W.2d 347 , 349 759 S.W.2d 160 (Tex.App. —Houston [1 Dist.] 1988) (Tex.Civ.App.--Beaumont 1980, writ ref'd n.r.e.). | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Burton v. Cravey
green
1 sentence2015Wade v. Anderson, 602 S.W.2d 347 , 349 759 S.W.2d 160 (Tex.App. —Houston [1 Dist.] 1988) (Tex.Civ.App.--Beaumont 1980, writ ref'd n.r.e.). | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.