5 Texas opinions name it 1 courts 2004–2020 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Interfirst Bank San Felipe, N.A. v. Paz Construction Co.green2 sentences2020Co., 715 S.W.2d 640, 641 (Tex. 1986); Super Starr Int’l LLC v. Fresh Tex Produce, LLC, 531 S.W.3d 829, 838 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi–Edinburg 2017, no pet.); Vantage Bank Tex. v Gonzalez, No. 13-19-00265-CV, 2020 WL 1615662 , *3 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi– 1 There was argument during the August hearing that EIC had deposited Rodriguez’s postdated checks after it sent the notice of acceleration. 2020Co., 715 S.W.2d 640, 641 (Tex. 1986); Super Starr Int’l LLC v. Fresh Tex Produce, LLC, 531 S.W.3d 829, 838 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi–Edinburg 2017, no pet.); Vantage Bank Tex. v Gonzalez, No. 13-19-00265-CV, 2020 WL 1615662 , *3 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi– 1 There was argument during the August hearing that EIC had deposited Rodriguez’s postdated checks after it sent the notice of acceleration. | 1 | 1 |
Super Starr International, LLC v. Fresh Tex Produce, LLCgreen2 sentences2020Co., 715 S.W.2d 640, 641 (Tex. 1986); Super Starr Int’l LLC v. Fresh Tex Produce, LLC, 531 S.W.3d 829, 838 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi–Edinburg 2017, no pet.); Vantage Bank Tex. v Gonzalez, No. 13-19-00265-CV, 2020 WL 1615662 , *3 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi– 1 There was argument during the August hearing that EIC had deposited Rodriguez’s postdated checks after it sent the notice of acceleration. 2020Co., 715 S.W.2d 640, 641 (Tex. 1986); Super Starr Int’l LLC v. Fresh Tex Produce, LLC, 531 S.W.3d 829, 838 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi–Edinburg 2017, no pet.); Vantage Bank Tex. v Gonzalez, No. 13-19-00265-CV, 2020 WL 1615662 , *3 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi– 1 There was argument during the August hearing that EIC had deposited Rodriguez’s postdated checks after it sent the notice of acceleration. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Castillo v. August
green
2 sentences2010Id. at 878 . 2010Id. at 878 . | 3 | 2010–2010 |
Holley v. Adams
green
2 sentences2004However, he appeared pro se at the August hearing and has represented himself ever since. [2] Scott has not filed a supplemental brief in response to the findings of fact and conclusions of law or in response to Andrea's supplemental brief. [3] As used in this discussion of the timeliness of the trial court's findings of fact and conclusions of law, the term "findings" refers to both the findings of fact and the conclusions of law. [4] Scott testified that he has seen tickets from Houston to Greenville sell for only $50 or $60 more, but generally such tickets cost between 2- and 5-times more t 2004However, he appeared pro se at the August hearing and has represented himself ever since. [2] Scott has not filed a supplemental brief in response to the findings of fact and conclusions of law or in response to Andrea's supplemental brief. [3] As used in this discussion of the timeliness of the trial court's findings of fact and conclusions of law, the term "findings" refers to both the findings of fact and the conclusions of law. [4] Scott testified that he has seen tickets from Houston to Greenville sell for only $50 or $60 more, but generally such tickets cost between 2- and 5-times more t | 1 | 2004–2004 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.