5 Texas opinions name it 2 courts 1985–2019 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Dwight L. Ingraham v. United States of America, Jocelyn Bonds, Etc. v. United Statesgreen1 sentence2015Smith Co. of Amarillo, 426 S.W.2d 834, 839 (Tex.1968) (concluding that estoppel did not bar the petitioner’s claim because the defendant failed to prove all the essential elements of the affirmative defense); Cameron Compress Co. v. Kubecka, 283 S.W. 285, 287 (Tex.Civ.App.—Austin 1926, writ ref'd) (citing Boswell v. Pannell, 107 Tex. 433 , 180 S.W. 593, 595 (1915)); see also Ingraham v. United States, 808 F.2d 1075, 1078-79 (5th Cir.1987) (identifying the features of an affirmative defense). | 1 | 1 |
Denton Publishing Company v. Boydgreen1 sentence2015Co. v. Boyd, 460 S.W.2d 881, 882 (Tex.1970) (holding that failure to prove and obtain favorable jury-findings in support of an avoidance defense constitutes waiver); Barfield v. Howard M. | 1 | 1 |
Barfield v. Howard M. Smith Company of Amarillogreen1 sentence2015Smith Co. of Amarillo, 426 S.W.2d 834, 839 (Tex.1968) (concluding that estoppel did not bar the petitioner’s claim because the defendant failed to prove all the essential elements of the affirmative defense); Cameron Compress Co. v. Kubecka, 283 S.W. 285, 287 (Tex.Civ.App.—Austin 1926, writ ref'd) (citing Boswell v. Pannell, 107 Tex. 433 , 180 S.W. 593, 595 (1915)); see also Ingraham v. United States, 808 F.2d 1075, 1078-79 (5th Cir.1987) (identifying the features of an affirmative defense). | 1 | 1 |
Cameron Compress Co. v. Kubeckagreen1 sentence2015Smith Co. of Amarillo, 426 S.W.2d 834, 839 (Tex.1968) (concluding that estoppel did not bar the petitioner’s claim because the defendant failed to prove all the essential elements of the affirmative defense); Cameron Compress Co. v. Kubecka, 283 S.W. 285, 287 (Tex.Civ.App.—Austin 1926, writ ref'd) (citing Boswell v. Pannell, 107 Tex. 433 , 180 S.W. 593, 595 (1915)); see also Ingraham v. United States, 808 F.2d 1075, 1078-79 (5th Cir.1987) (identifying the features of an affirmative defense). | 1 | 1 |
Boswell v. Pannellgreen2 sentences2015Smith Co. of Amarillo, 426 S.W.2d 834, 839 (Tex.1968) (concluding that estoppel did not bar the petitioner’s claim because the defendant failed to prove all the essential elements of the affirmative defense); Cameron Compress Co. v. Kubecka, 283 S.W. 285, 287 (Tex.Civ.App.—Austin 1926, writ ref'd) (citing Boswell v. Pannell, 107 Tex. 433 , 180 S.W. 593, 595 (1915)); see also Ingraham v. United States, 808 F.2d 1075, 1078-79 (5th Cir.1987) (identifying the features of an affirmative defense). 2015Smith Co. of Amarillo, 426 S.W.2d 834, 839 (Tex.1968) (concluding that estoppel did not bar the petitioner’s claim because the defendant failed to prove all the essential elements of the affirmative defense); Cameron Compress Co. v. Kubecka, 283 S.W. 285, 287 (Tex.Civ.App.—Austin 1926, writ ref'd) (citing Boswell v. Pannell, 107 Tex. 433 , 180 S.W. 593, 595 (1915)); see also Ingraham v. United States, 808 F.2d 1075, 1078-79 (5th Cir.1987) (identifying the features of an affirmative defense). | 1 | 1 |
Moulton v. Alamo Ambulance Service, Inc.green2 sentences1990See Moulton v. Alamo Ambulance Serv., Inc., 414 S.W.2d 444, 448 (Tex.1967). 1990See Moulton v. Alamo Ambulance Serv., Inc., 414 S.W.2d 444, 448 (Tex.1967). | 1 | 1 |
Luling Oil & Gas Co. v. Humble Oil & Refining Co.green1 sentence1985See Luting Oil & Gas Co. v. Humble Oil & Refining Co., 191 S.W.2d at 723 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Mirta Zorrilla v. Aypco Construction II, LLC and Jose Luis Munoz
green
1 sentence2019Zorrilla, 469 S.W.3d at 156 . | 1 | 2019–2019 |
KPMG Peat Marwick v. Harrison County Housing Finance Corp.
green
1 sentence2016KPMG Peat Marwick, 988 S.W.2d at 749-50 ; Mellon Serv. | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.