5 Texas opinions name it 2 courts 2007–2026 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Fuentes v. Stategreen2 sentences2007See Fuentes v. State, 664 S.W.2d 333, 335 (Tex.Crim.App.1984). 2007See Fuentes v. State , 664 S.W.2d 333, 335 (Tex. Crim. | 3 | 3 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Miles v. State
green
2 sentences2026“When a jury is told of this presumption, it is told, in effect, to judge an accused’s guilt or innocence solely on the basis of the evidence adduced at trial and not on the basis of suspicions that arise from the fact of his arrest, indictment, or custody.” Id. 10 During voir dire, the trial court made the following comments about the presumption of innocence. 2026“When a jury is told of this presumption, it is told, in effect, to judge an accused’s guilt or innocence solely on the basis of the evidence adduced at trial and not on the basis of suspicions that arise from the fact of his arrest, indictment, or custody.” Id. 10 During voir dire, the trial court made the following comments about the presumption of innocence. | 2 | 2026–2026 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.