5 Texas opinions name it 2 courts 2000–2018 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Green v. Stategreen2 sentences2000See Green v. State , 754 S.W.2d 687, 687-88 (Tex. Crim. 2000See Green v. State, 754 S.W.2d 687, 687-88 (Tex.Crim.App.1988) (holding when hearing on motion for new trial is improperly denied, remedy is to remand for delayed hearing on motion). | 2 | 2 |
Harrell v. Stategreen1 sentence2018Harrell v. State, 725 S.W.2d 208, 209 (Tex. Crim. | 1 | 1 |
Perez, Ex Parte Alberto Girongreen1 sentence2015See, e.g., Ex parte Perez, 398 S.W.3d 206 (Tex. Crim. | 1 | 1 |
In Re TTFgreen1 sentence2014In the Interest 12 of T.T.F., 331 S.W.3d 461, 478 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2010, no pet.). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.