5 Texas opinions name it 1 courts 2007–2022 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Hare v. City of Corinth, Miss.green2 sentences2022When an episodic-act-or-omission claim is brought against the municipal defendant, “the plaintiff must demonstrate a municipal employee’s subjective indifference and additionally that the municipal employee’s act ‘resulted from a municipal policy or custom adopted or maintained with objective deliberate indifference to the [plaintiff]’s constitutional rights.’” 8 Id. (quoting Hare, 74 F.3d at 649 n.14); see Rocha, 419 S.W.3d at 378 . 2010Id. (citing Hare, 74 F.3d at 645). | 1 | 5 |
Michelle Rocha, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of Raymond Dwayne Bingle v. Potter County, Texasgreen1 sentence2022When an episodic-act-or-omission claim is brought against the municipal defendant, “the plaintiff must demonstrate a municipal employee’s subjective indifference and additionally that the municipal employee’s act ‘resulted from a municipal policy or custom adopted or maintained with objective deliberate indifference to the [plaintiff]’s constitutional rights.’” 8 Id. (quoting Hare, 74 F.3d at 649 n.14); see Rocha, 419 S.W.3d at 378 . | 1 | 1 |
cluster 16162green1 sentence2022“Deliberate indifference” in this context requires a showing “that the defendants (1) were aware of facts from which an inference of an excessive risk to the prisoner’s health or safety could be drawn and (2) that they actually drew an inference that such potential for harm existed.” Bradley v. Puckett, 157 F.3d 1022, 1025 (5th Cir. 1998). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Sharon Olabisiomotosho v. City of Houston City of Houston P. J. Bartlett K. L. Richards Rene Bertrand
green
1 sentence2022When an episodic-act-or-omission claim is brought against the municipal defendant, “the plaintiff must demonstrate a municipal employee’s subjective indifference and additionally that the municipal employee’s act ‘resulted from a municipal policy or custom adopted or maintained with objective deliberate indifference to the [plaintiff]’s constitutional rights.’” 8 Id. (quoting Hare, 74 F.3d at 649 n.14); see Rocha, 419 S.W.3d at 378 . | 1 | 2022–2022 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.