5 Texas opinions name it 2 courts 2007–2026 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Lohrmann v. Pittsburgh Corning Corp.green2 sentences2026At the time, “[p]erhaps the most widely cited standard for proving causation in asbestos cases [was] the Lohrmann ‘frequency, regularity, and proximity’ test.” Id. at 769 (citing Lohrmann v. Pittsburgh Corning Corp., 782 F.2d 1156, 1163 (4th Cir. 1986)). 2019Id. at 769 (citing Lohrmann v. Pittsburgh Corning Corp., 782 F.2d 1156 (4th Cir. 1986)). | 1 | 3 |
In Re Oakwood Mobile Homes, Inc.green1 sentence2007See, e.g., In re Oakwood Mobile Homes , 987 S.W.2d at 574 ; In re John M. | 1 | 1 |
Gerald S. Slaughter, Roma S. Bates v. Southern Talc Companygreen1 sentence2007Lohrmann v. Pittsburgh Coming Corp., 782 F.2d 1156 (4th Cir. 1986); see also Slaughter v. Southern Talc Co., 949 F.2d 167, 171 (5th Cir.1991) (noting that Lohrmann is “[t]he most frequently used test for causation in asbestos cases” and applying Lohrmann to an asbestos claim governed by Texas law). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Borg-Warner Corp. v. Flores
green
2 sentences2026At the time, “[p]erhaps the most widely cited standard for proving causation in asbestos cases [was] the Lohrmann ‘frequency, regularity, and proximity’ test.” Id. at 769 (citing Lohrmann v. Pittsburgh Corning Corp., 782 F.2d 1156, 1163 (4th Cir. 1986)). 2022See id. § 90.004(e); Borg- Warner Corp. v. Flores, 232 S.W.3d 765 , 769–70 (Tex. 2007) (“Perhaps the most widely cited standard for proving causation in asbestos cases is the Lohrmann ‘frequency, regularity, and proximity’ test.” (citing Lohrmann v. Pittsburgh Corning Corp., 782 F.3d 1156 (4th Cir. 1986))). | 3 | 2019–2026 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.