5 Vermont opinions name it 2 courts 2002–2017 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Vermont courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Finberg v. Murnanegreen2 sentences2011See 159 Vt. at 436 , 623 A.2d at 982 (‘We are also not persuaded that we should read the Access to Public Records Act exception as broadly as the specific exception for tax return information held by the Vermont Commissioner of Taxes.”). 2011See 159 Vt. at 436 , 623 A.2d at 982 (‘We are also not persuaded that we should read the Access to Public Records Act exception as broadly as the specific exception for tax return information held by the Vermont Commissioner of Taxes.”). | 3 | 3 |
Bevins v. Kinggreen2 sentences2017See, e.g., V.R.C.P. 15(a); Lillicrap v. Martin, 156 Vt. 165 (1991); Hunters, Anglers and Trappers Ass’n of Vermont, Inc. v. Winooski Valley Park Dist., 2006 VT 82, ¶ 17 , 181 Vt. 12 (quoting Bevins v. King, 143 Vt. 252, 254-55 (1983)). 2017See, e.g., V.R.C.P. 15(a); Lillicrap v. Martin, 156 Vt. 165 (1991); Hunters, Anglers and Trappers Ass’n of Vermont, Inc. v. Winooski Valley Park Dist., 2006 VT 82, ¶ 17 , 181 Vt. 12 (quoting Bevins v. King, 143 Vt. 252, 254-55 (1983)). | 1 | 1 |
Animal Legal Defense Fund, Inc. v. Institutional Animal Care & Use Committeegreen2 sentences2003See 1 V.S.A. § 317(c)(11) (exempting from disclosure “student records at educational institutions funded wholly or in part by state revenue” except where disclosure is required upon request under FERPA); Animal Legal Defense Fund, 159 Vt. at 139-40 , 616 A.2d at 227 (noting that student records exception demonstrates that University of Vermont is generally subject to Act). 2003See 1 V.S.A. § 317(c)(11) (exempting from disclosure “student records at educational institutions funded wholly or in part by state revenue” except where disclosure is required upon request under FERPA); Animal Legal Defense Fund, 159 Vt. at 139-40 , 616 A.2d at 227 (noting that student records exception demonstrates that University of Vermont is generally subject to Act). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Vermont. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Hunters, Anglers & Trappers Ass'n of Vermont, Inc. v. Winooski Valley Park District
green
2 sentences2017See, e.g., V.R.C.P. 15(a); Lillicrap v. Martin, 156 Vt. 165 (1991); Hunters, Anglers and Trappers Ass’n of Vermont, Inc. v. Winooski Valley Park Dist., 2006 VT 82, ¶ 17 , 181 Vt. 12 (quoting Bevins v. King, 143 Vt. 252, 254-55 (1983)). 2017See, e.g., V.R.C.P. 15(a); Lillicrap v. Martin, 156 Vt. 165 (1991); Hunters, Anglers and Trappers Ass’n of Vermont, Inc. v. Winooski Valley Park Dist., 2006 VT 82, ¶ 17 , 181 Vt. 12 (quoting Bevins v. King, 143 Vt. 252, 254-55 (1983)). | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Lillicrap v. Martin
green
2 sentences2017See, e.g., V.R.C.P. 15(a); Lillicrap v. Martin, 156 Vt. 165 (1991); Hunters, Anglers and Trappers Ass’n of Vermont, Inc. v. Winooski Valley Park Dist., 2006 VT 82, ¶ 17 , 181 Vt. 12 (quoting Bevins v. King, 143 Vt. 252, 254-55 (1983)). 2017See, e.g., V.R.C.P. 15(a); Lillicrap v. Martin, 156 Vt. 165 (1991); Hunters, Anglers and Trappers Ass’n of Vermont, Inc. v. Winooski Valley Park Dist., 2006 VT 82, ¶ 17 , 181 Vt. 12 (quoting Bevins v. King, 143 Vt. 252, 254-55 (1983)). | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Hunters, Anglers & Trappers Assoc. of VT v. Winooski Valley Park District
green
2 sentences2017See, e.g., V.R.C.P. 15(a); Lillicrap v. Martin, 156 Vt. 165 (1991); Hunters, Anglers and Trappers Ass’n of Vermont, Inc. v. Winooski Valley Park Dist., 2006 VT 82, ¶ 17 , 181 Vt. 12 (quoting Bevins v. King, 143 Vt. 252, 254-55 (1983)). 2017See, e.g., V.R.C.P. 15(a); Lillicrap v. Martin, 156 Vt. 165 (1991); Hunters, Anglers and Trappers Ass’n of Vermont, Inc. v. Winooski Valley Park Dist., 2006 VT 82, ¶ 17 , 181 Vt. 12 (quoting Bevins v. King, 143 Vt. 252, 254-55 (1983)). | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.