protective sweep exception (Washington) · Go Syfert
← Washington issues

protective sweep exception in Washington

5 Washington opinions name it 2 courts 2017–2020 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

CaseFollowedCited
United States v. Martinsgreen
ca1 · 2005 · cited in 1 Washington opinions naming this issue, 2018–2018
1 sentence

2018In United States v. Daoust, the First Circuit reasoned that the defendant's violent history, known gun possession, and residence in an isolated cabin provided the officers with the reasonable suspicion required to conduct the protective sweep. 916 F.2d 757 , 759 (1st Cir. 1990) ; see also United States v. Martins, 413 F.3d 139 , 150 (1st Cir. 2005).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (8)

CaseCitedYears
State Of Washington v. Lovett James Chambers green
washctapp · 2016
1 sentence

2020In State v. Chambers, 197 Wn.

12020–2020
State Of Washington v. Bryan Eugene Streepy green
washctapp · 2017
1 sentence

2019State v. Streepy, 199 Wn.

12019–2019
Maryland v. Buie green
scotus · 1990
2 sentences

2018Burton's unambiguous consent to officers searching her apartment makes it unnecessary to decide the applicability of Buie in nonarrest situations ¶ 14 Second, Blockman contends that the protective sweep exception to the warrant requirement set forth in Buie is valid only if it occurs incident to arrest. 494 U.S. at 334 , 110 S.Ct. 1093 .

2018Burton's unambiguous consent to officers searching her apartment makes it unnecessary to decide the applicability of Buie in nonarrest situations ¶ 14 Second, Blockman contends that the protective sweep exception to the warrant requirement set forth in Buie is valid only if it occurs incident to arrest. 494 U.S. at 334 , 110 S.Ct. 1093 .

12018–2018
Terry v. Ohio green
scotus · 1968
2 sentences

2018Relying on its rationale in Terry' and Long,^ the Buie Court held Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 , 88 S. Ct. 1868 , 20 L.

2018Relying on its rationale in Terry' and Long,^ the Buie Court held Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 , 88 S. Ct. 1868 , 20 L.

12018–2018
United States v. Rodney J. Daoust green
ca1 · 1990
1 sentence

2018In United States v. Daoust, the First Circuit reasoned that the defendant's violent history, known gun possession, and residence in an isolated cabin provided the officers with the reasonable suspicion required to conduct the protective sweep. 916 F.2d 757 , 759 (1st Cir. 1990) ; see also United States v. Martins, 413 F.3d 139 , 150 (1st Cir. 2005).

12018–2018
State v. Smith neutral
washctapp · 2007
1 sentence

2018State v. Smith, 137 Wn.

12018–2018
State v. Garvin green
wash · 2009
1 sentence

2017State v. Garvin, 166 Wn.2d 242, 249 , 207 P.3d 1266 (2009).

12017–2017
State v. Garvin green
wash · 2009
1 sentence

2017State v. Garvin, 166 Wn.2d 242, 249 , 207 P.3d 1266 (2009).

12017–2017

Where else courts name it

NJ 19 (2010–2026) CA 17 (1983–2023) KY 12 (1986–2025) PA 11 (1982–2026) TX 11 (2004–2026) OH 8 (2008–2025) WI 7 (2000–2021) VA 5 (2007–2026) WA 5 (2017–2020) IN 4 (1991–2019) NM 4 (1995–2017) ID 3 (1999–2026) NY 3 (2002–2011) WV 3 (2013–2014) IL 3 (1995–2010) MI 2 (2025–2025) DE 2 (2017–2023) OR 2 (1999–2007) AZ 2 (2010–2011) CT 2 (2014–2019) MA 2 (2002–2007)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check