35 Missouri opinions name it 2 courts 1988–2025 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Missouri courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Nunleygreen2 sentences2003State v. Nunley, 980 S.W.2d 290, 292 (Mo. banc 1998). 2002State v. Nunley, 980 S.W.2d 290, 292 (Mo. banc 1998). | 4 | 4 |
Sidebottom v. Stategreen2 sentences1993“To prove a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, a Rule 29.15 movant must show that counsel’s performance was deficient and that the deficiency prejudiced his defense.” Sidebottom v. State, 781 S.W.2d 791, 796 (Mo. banc 1989), cert. denied, 497 U.S. 1032 , 110 S.Ct. 3295 , 111 L.Ed.2d 804 (1990). 1991“To prove a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, a Rule 29.15 movant must show that counsel’s performance was deficient and that the deficiency prejudiced his defense.” Sidebottom v. State, 781 S.W.2d 791 (Mo. banc 1989), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 110 S.Ct. 3295 , 111 L.Ed.2d 804 (1990). | 3 | 4 |
Morales v. Stategreen2 sentences2015Morales v. State, 104 S.W.3d 432, 434 (Mo. App. E.D. 2003). 2011Morales v. State, 104 S.W.3d 432, 434 (Mo.App. | 2 | 2 |
Strickland v. Washingtongreen2 sentences1989Seevers must under the two pronged test of Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687 , 104 S.Ct. 2052, 2064 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984), show by a preponderance of the evidence, the attorney’s performance was deficient, and this deficiency prejudiced his defense. 1989Seevers must under the two pronged test of Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687 , 104 S.Ct. 2052, 2064 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984), show by a preponderance of the evidence, the attorney’s performance was deficient, and this deficiency prejudiced his defense. | 1 | 23 |
State v. Tokargreen2 sentences1997Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687 , 104 S.Ct. 2052, 2064 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984); State v. Tokar, 918 S.W.2d 753, 761 (Mo. banc), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 307 , 136 L.Ed.2d 224 (1996). 1997Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687 , 104 S.Ct. 2052, 2064 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984); Tokar, 918 S.W.2d at 761 . | 1 | 3 |
Smith v. Stategreen1 sentence2016To be entitled to an evidentiary hearing, a movant must demonstrate that “counsel’s performance was deficient and that this deficiency prejudiced the defense.” State v. Smith, 353 S.W.3d 1, 3 (Mo.App.E.D.2011). | 1 | 1 |
Nichols v. Stategreen1 sentence2016By pleading guilty, “a movant waives any claim that [plea] counsel was ineffective except to the extent that counsel’s .conduct affected the volun-tariness and knowledge with which the plea was made.” Nichols v. State, 409 S.W.3d 566, 569 (Mo.App.E.D,2013) (citation and quotations omitted). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Phillipsgreen1 sentence2000State v. Phillips, 940 S.W.2d 512, 522 (Mo. banc 1997). | 1 | 1 |
Leisure v. Stategreen1 sentence1993Leisure v. State, 828 S.W.2d 872, 874 (Mo. banc 1992). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Missouri. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Becker v. Southwest Travis County Road District No. 1
green
1 sentence1997Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687 , 104 S.Ct. 2052, 2064 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984); State v. Tokar, 918 S.W.2d 753, 761 (Mo. banc), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 307 , 136 L.Ed.2d 224 (1996). | 1 | 1997–1997 |
Gilbert v. Smith
green
1 sentence1997Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687 , 104 S.Ct. 2052, 2064 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984); State v. Tokar, 918 S.W.2d 753, 761 (Mo. banc), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 307 , 136 L.Ed.2d 224 (1996). | 1 | 1997–1997 |
Danial Siebert v. Alabama
green
1 sentence1993“To prove a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, a Rule 29.15 movant must show that counsel’s performance was deficient and that the deficiency prejudiced his defense.” Sidebottom v. State, 781 S.W.2d 791, 796 (Mo. banc 1989), cert. denied, 497 U.S. 1032 , 110 S.Ct. 3295 , 111 L.Ed.2d 804 (1990). | 1 | 1993–1993 |
Sanders v. State
green
1 sentence1992Id. | 1 | 1992–1992 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.