myriad of other factors in Indiana

2025“Whether a sentence is inappropriate ultimately turns on the culpability of the defendant, the severity of the crime, the damage done to others, and a myriad of other factors that come to light in a given case.” Thompson v. State, 5 N.E.3d 383, 391 (Ind. Ct. App. 2014) (citing Cardwell v. State, 895 N.E.2d 1219, 1224 (Ind. 2008)).

2024“Whether a sentence is inappropriate ultimately turns on the culpability of the defendant, the severity of the crime, the damage done to others, and a myriad of other factors that come to light in a given case.” Thompson v. State, 5 N.E.3d 383, 391 (Ind. Ct. App. 2014) (citing Cardwell v. State, 895 N.E.2d 1219, 1224 (Ind. 2008)).

2025“Whether a sentence is inappropriate ultimately turns on the culpability of the defendant, the severity of the crime, the damage done to others, and a myriad of other factors that come to light in Court of Appeals of Indiana | Opinion 24A-CR-2608 | September 22, 2025 Page 11 of 15 a given case.” Thompson v. State, 5 N.E.3d 383, 391 (Ind. Ct. App. 2014).

2025“Whether a sentence is inappropriate ultimately turns on the culpability of the defendant, the severity of the crime, the damage done to others, and a myriad of other factors that come to light in a given case.” Thompson v. State, 5 N.E.3d 383, 391 (Ind. Ct. App. 2014) (citing Cardwell v. State, 895 N.E.2d 1219, 1224 (Ind. 2008)).

2018Additionally, “[u]nder Indiana law, several tools are available to the trial court to use in fashioning an appropriate sentence for a convicted offender.” Sharp v. State, 970 N.E.2d 647, 650 (Ind. 2012).

2016Additionally, “[u]nder Indiana law, several tools are available to the trial court to use in fashioning an appropriate sentence for a convicted offender.” Sharp v. State, 970 N.E.2d 647, 650 (Ind. 2012).

2019Anglemyer v. State, 868 N.E.2d 482, 494 (Ind. 2007), clarified on reh’g 875 N.E.2d 218 (Ind. 2007).

2018Whether a sentence is inappropriate ultimately depends upon “the culpability of the defendant, the severity of the crime, the damage done to others, and a myriad of other factors that come to light in a given case.” Cardwell v. State, 895 N.E.2d 1219, 1224 (Ind. 2008). [39] “‘[R]egarding the nature of the offense, the advisory sentence is the starting point the Legislature has selected as an appropriate sentence for the crime Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 18A-CR-234 |December 21, 2018 Page 22 of 25 committed.’” Bowman v. State, 51 N.E.3d 1174, 1181 (Ind. 2016) (quoting Angl

2024“Appellate Rule 7(B) analysis is not to determine whether another sentence is more appropriate but rather whether the sentence imposed is inappropriate.” Conley v. State, 972 N.E.2d 864, 876 (Ind. 2012) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted), reh’g denied. [15] When determining whether a sentence is inappropriate, we acknowledge that the advisory sentence “is the starting point the Legislature has selected as an Court of Appeals of Indiana | Opinion 24A-CR-760 | August 30, 2024 Page 7 of 10 appropriate sentence for the crime committed.” Childress, 848 N.E.2d at 1081 .

2013Our sentence review under Appellate Rule 7(B) “is not to determine whether another sentence is more appropriate but rather whether the sentence imposed is inappropriate.” Conley v. State, 972 N.E.2d 864, 876 (Ind. 2012) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted), reh’g denied.

2020Whether a sentence is inappropriate ultimately depends upon “the culpability of the defendant, the severity of the crime, the damage done to others, and a myriad of other factors that come to light in a given case.” Dilts, 80 N.E.3d at 188-89 .

2020Whether a sentence is inappropriate ultimately depends upon “the culpability of the defendant, the severity of the crime, the damage done to others, and a myriad of other factors that come to light in a given case.” Dilts, 80 N.E.3d at 188-89 .

2018“Whether a sentence is inappropriate ultimately turns on the culpability of the defendant, the severity of the crime, the damage done to others, and a myriad of other factors that come to light in a given case.” Id. [14] Colen argues that her character makes her sentence inappropriate.

2017“Whether a sentence is inappropriate ultimately turns on the culpability of the defendant, the severity of the crime, the damage done to others, and a myriad of other factors that come to light in a given case.” Schaaf v. State, 54 N.E.3d 1041, 1045 (Ind. Ct. App. 2016).

2020“Whether a sentence is Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 19A-CR-1562 | January 17, 2020 Page 3 of 6 inappropriate ultimately turns on the culpability of the defendant, the severity of the crime, the damage done to others, and a myriad of other factors that come to light in a given case.” Thompson v. State, 5 N.E.3d 383, 391 (Ind. Ct. App. 2014). [5] In assessing the nature of an offense, “the advisory sentence is the starting point for determining the appropriateness of a sentence.” Pelissier v. State, 122 N.E.3d 983, 990 (Ind. Ct. App. 2019), trans. denied.

2019In conducting our review, we may consider “all aspects of the penal consequences imposed by the trial court in sentencing, i.e., whether it consists of executed time, probation, suspension, home detention, or placement in community corrections, and whether the sentences run concurrently or consecutively.” Davidson v. State, 926 N.E.2d 1023, 1025 (Ind. 2010).

2019“Whether a sentence is inappropriate ultimately turns on the culpability of the defendant, the severity of the crime, the damage done to others, and a myriad of other factors that come to light in a given case.” McFall v. State, 71 N.E.3d 383, 390 (Ind. Ct. App. 2017).

2019“In assessing whether a sentence is inappropriate, appellate courts may take into account whether a portion of the sentence is ordered suspended or is otherwise crafted using any of the variety of sentencing tools available to the trial judge.” Id.

2019Deference to the trial court should prevail, “unless overcome by compelling evidence portraying in a positive light the nature of the offense (such as accompanied by restraint, regard, and lack of brutality) and the defendant’s character (such as substantial virtuous traits or Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 19A-CR-717 | September 16, 2019 Page 4 of 7 persistent examples of good character).” Stephenson v. State, 29 N.E.3d 111, 122 (Ind. 2015). [8] Whether a sentence is inappropriate ultimately depends upon “the culpability of the defendant, the severity of the crime, the dama

2018Whether a sentence is inappropriate ultimately depends upon “the culpability of the defendant, the severity of the crime, the damage done to others, and a myriad of other factors that come to light in a given case.” Cardwell v. State, 895 N.E.2d 1219, 1224 (Ind. 2008). [39] “‘[R]egarding the nature of the offense, the advisory sentence is the starting point the Legislature has selected as an appropriate sentence for the crime Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 18A-CR-234 |December 21, 2018 Page 22 of 25 committed.’” Bowman v. State, 51 N.E.3d 1174, 1181 (Ind. 2016) (quoting Angl

2018Parks v. State, 22 N.E.3d 552, 555 (Ind. 2014).

2016Bratcher v. State, 999 N.E.2d 864, 870 (Ind. Ct. App. 2013), trans. denied.

2015Harman v. State, 4 N.E.3d 209, 219 (Ind. Ct. App. 2014), trans. denied. [38] At the time Garrett committed his crimes, the advisory sentence for a Class A felony was thirty years, the minimum sentence was twenty years, and the maximum sentence was fifty years.