30 Texas opinions name it 2 courts 2003–2026 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Shah v. Mossgreen2 sentences2019See MMP, Ltd. v. Jones, 710 S.W.2d 59, 60 (Tex. 1986); see also Shah v. Moss, 67 S.W.3d 836, 842 (Tex. 2001) (noting that a defendant moving for summary judgment on a statute of limitations affirmative defense must prove conclusively all elements of that defense). 2014See MMP, Ltd. v. Jones, 710 S.W.2d 59, 60 (Tex. 1986); see also Shah v. Moss, 67 S.W.3d 836, 842 (Tex. 2001) (noting that a defendant moving for summary judgment on a statute of limitations affirmative defense must prove conclusively all elements of that defense). | 14 | 20 |
Frost National Bank v. Fernandezgreen2 sentences2026Burton v. Labor, No. 02-18-00179-CV, 2019 WL 237736 , at *2 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth Jan. 17, 2019, no pet.); see Frost Nat’l Bank v. Fernandez, 315 S.W.3d 494 , 508–09 (Tex. 7 2010). 2011See Fernandez , 315 S.W.3d at 508–09. | 2 | 2 |
MMP, Ltd. v. Jonesgreen2 sentences2019See MMP, Ltd. v. Jones, 710 S.W.2d 59, 60 (Tex. 1986); see also Shah v. Moss, 67 S.W.3d 836, 842 (Tex. 2001) (noting that a defendant moving for summary judgment on a statute of limitations affirmative defense must prove conclusively all elements of that defense). 2014See MMP, Ltd. v. Jones, 710 S.W.2d 59, 60 (Tex. 1986); see also Shah v. Moss, 67 S.W.3d 836, 842 (Tex. 2001) (noting that a defendant moving for summary judgment on a statute of limitations affirmative defense must prove conclusively all elements of that defense). | 2 | 2 |
In Re Bullockgreen2 sentences2011See, e.g., In re M.Y.W., No. 14-06-00185-CV, 2006 WL 3360482 , at *2 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] Nov. 21, 2006, pet. denied) (mem. op.) (six-month limitation on attacks on termination ruling in section 161.211 is affirmative defense); In re Bullock, 146 S.W.3d 783, 790-91 (Tex.App.-Beaumont 2004, no pet.) (orig. *822 proceeding) ("Essentially, section 161.211's six month limitation on attacks on termination rulings is an affirmative defense" required to be pled and presented to trial court); In re S.A.B., No. 04-01-00795-CV, 2002 WL 31060158 , at *1 (Tex.App.-San Antonio Sept. 18, 2002, no 2011See, e.g., In re M.Y.W., No. 14-06-00185-CV, 2006 WL 3360482 , at *2 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] Nov. 21, 2006, pet. denied) (mem. op.) (six-month limitation on attacks on termination ruling in section 161.211 is affirmative defense); In re Bullock, 146 S.W.3d 783, 790-91 (Tex.App.-Beaumont 2004, no pet.) (orig. proceeding) (“Essentially, section 161.211’s six month limitation on attacks on termination rulings is an affirmative defense” required to be pled and presented to trial court); In re S.A.B., No. 04-01-00795-CV, 2002 WL 31060158 , at *1 (Tex.App.-San Antonio Sept. 18, 2002, no pet.) | 2 | 2 |
Manzell v. Hightowergreen2 sentences2011See Manzell v. Hightower, 159 S.W.2d 552, 554 (Tex. Civ. 2011See Manzell v. Hightower , 159 S.W.2d 552, 554 (Tex. Civ. | 2 | 2 |
Garza v. Exel Logistics, Inc.green2 sentences2010Shah , 67 S.W.3d at 842 ; see Garza v. Exel Logistics, Inc. , 161 S.W.3d 473 , 475 n.10 (Tex. 2005) ("[A] defendant moving for summary judgment on an affirmative defense must prove each element of its defense as a matter of law, leaving no issues of material fact."). 2010Shah, 67 S.W.3d at 842 ; see Garza v. Exel Logistics, Inc., 161 S.W.3d 473 , 475 n.10 (Tex. 2005) (“[A] defendant moving for summary judgment on an affirmative defense must prove each element of its defense as a matter of law, leaving no issues of material fact.”). | 2 | 2 |
Jones v. Blumegreen2 sentences2009Shah v. Moss, 67 S.W.3d 836, 842 (Tex.2001); Jones v. Blume, 196 S.W.3d 440, 445 (Tex.App.-Dallas 2006, pet. denied). 2009Shah v. Moss, 67 S.W.3d 836, 842 (Tex. 2001); Jones v. Blume, 196 S.W.3d 440, 445 (Tex.App.-Dallas 2006, pet. denied). | 2 | 2 |
City of Austin v. Travis County Landfill Co.green1 sentence2020See id.; see also City of Austin/Travis County Landfill Co. v. Travis County Landfill Co., 25 S.W.3d 191, 204 (Tex. App.—Austin 1999), rev’d on other grounds, 73 S.W.3d 234 (Tex. 2002) (“Furthermore, the City did not request a jury submission regarding the statute of limitations affirmative defense. | 1 | 1 |
City of Austin v. Travis County Landfill Co.green1 sentence2020See id.; see also City of Austin/Travis County Landfill Co. v. Travis County Landfill Co., 25 S.W.3d 191, 204 (Tex. App.—Austin 1999), rev’d on other grounds, 73 S.W.3d 234 (Tex. 2002) (“Furthermore, the City did not request a jury submission regarding the statute of limitations affirmative defense. | 1 | 1 |
Burns v. Thomasgreen1 sentence2018Shah v. Moss, 67 S.W.3d 836 , 842 4 (Tex. 2001); see also Burns v. Thomas, 786 S.W.2d 266, 267 (Tex. 1990). | 1 | 1 |
DiGrazia v. Oldgreen1 sentence2015See DiGrazia v. Old, 900 S.W.2d 499, 502-04 (Tex. App.—Texarkana 1995, no writ) (detailing the nature of a fraudulent concealment defense). | 1 | 1 |
Jennings v. Burgessgreen1 sentence2006See Jennings v. Burgess, 917 S.W.2d 790, 793 (Tex.1996); Zale Corp. v. Rosenbaum, 520 S.W.2d 889, 891 (Tex. *284 1975). | 1 | 1 |
Zale Corporation v. Rosenbaumgreen1 sentence2006See Jennings v. Burgess, 917 S.W.2d 790, 793 (Tex.1996); Zale Corp. v. Rosenbaum, 520 S.W.2d 889, 891 (Tex. *284 1975). | 1 | 1 |
Velsicol Chemical Corp. v. Winogradgreen1 sentence2003Shah , 67 S.W.3d at 842 (citing Velsicol Chemical Corp. v. Winograd , 956 S.W.2d 529, 530 (Tex. 1997)). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Martin v. Texas Woman's Hospital, Inc.
green
2 sentences2008Martin , 930 S.W.2d at 721 . 2008Martin, 930 S.W.2d at 721 . | 2 | 2008–2008 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.