application of some erroneous rule in Connecticut

1982“The conclusions reached must stand unless they are legally or logically inconsistent with the facts found or unless they involve the application of some erroneous rule of law material to the case.” Laske v. Hartford, 172 Conn. 515, 518 , 375 A.2d 996 (1977); Ross v. Ross, 172 Conn. 269, 275 , 374 A.2d 185 (1977); Johnston Jewels, Ltd. v. Leonard, 156 Conn. 75, 79 , 239 A.2d 500 (1968).

1982“The conclusions reached must stand unless they are legally or logically inconsistent with the facts found or unless they involve the application of some erroneous rule of law material to the case.” Laske v. Hartford, 172 Conn. 515, 518 , 375 A.2d 996 (1977); Ross v. Ross, 172 Conn. 269, 275 , 374 A.2d 185 (1977); Johnston Jewels, Ltd. v. Leonard, 156 Conn. 75, 79 , 239 A.2d 500 (1968).

1976These conclusions must stand unless they are legally or logically inconsistent with the facts found or unless they involve the application of some erroneous rule of law material to the case.” Cedo Bros., Inc. v. Feldmann, 161 Conn. 265, 271 , 287 A.2d 374 ; Johnston Jewels, Ltd. v. Leonard, 156 Conn. 75, 79 , 239 A.2d 500 ; Craig v. Dunleavy, 154 Conn. 100, 105 , 221 A.2d 855 ; Maltbie, Conn. App. Proc. § 166.

1976These conclusions must stand unless they are legally or logically inconsistent with the facts found or unless they involve the application of some erroneous rule of law material to the case.” Cedo Bros., Inc. v. Feldmann, 161 Conn. 265, 271 , 287 A.2d 374 ; Johnston Jewels, Ltd. v. Leonard, 156 Conn. 75, 79 , 239 A.2d 500 ; Craig v. Dunleavy, 154 Conn. 100, 105 , 221 A.2d 855 ; Maltbie, Conn. App. Proc. § 166.

1979The trial court’s conclusions are tested by the finding; Brauer v. Freccia, 159 Conn. 289, 293 , 268 A.2d 645 (1970); and the court’s conclusions must stand unless inconsistent with the facts found or unless they involve the application of some erroneous rule of law.

1979The trial court’s conclusions are tested by the finding; Brauer v. Freccia, 159 Conn. 289, 293 , 268 A.2d 645 (1970); and the court’s conclusions must stand unless inconsistent with the facts found or unless they involve the application of some erroneous rule of law.

1978"A conclusion must stand unless it is legally or logically inconsistent with the facts found or unless it involves the application of some erroneous rule of law." Hutensky v. Avon, 163 Conn. 433 , 437 .

1978“A conclusion must stand unless it is legally or logically inconsistent with the facts found or unless it involves the application of some erroneous rule of law.” Hutensky v. Avon, 163 Conn. 433, 437 .

1968“The conclusions which the court has reached are to be tested by the facts as found and must stand unless they are legally or logically inconsistent with those facts or unless they involve the application of some erroneous rule of law material to the case.” Yale University v. Benneson, 147 Conn. 254, 255 ; Kielb v. Weinberg Realty Corporation, 147 Conn. 677, 680 .

1968“The conclusions which the court has reached are to be tested by the facts as found and must stand unless they are legally or logically inconsistent with those facts or unless they involve the application of some erroneous rule of law material to the case.” Yale University v. Benneson, 147 Conn. 254, 255 ; Kielb v. Weinberg Realty Corporation, 147 Conn. 677, 680 .

1964“The conclusions . . . must be tested by the facts as found and must stand unless they are legally or logically inconsistent with those facts or unless they involve the application of some erroneous rule of law material to the case.” Bridgeport Hydraulic Co. v. Sciortino, 138 Conn. 690, 692 ; Klahr v. Kostopoulos, supra. Since no corrections have been allowed in the finding, the conclusions must be tested by the facts found by the court.

1963“The conclusions . . . must be tested by the facts as found and must stand unless they are legally or logically inconsistent with those facts or unless they involve the application of some erroneous rule of law material to the case.” Bridgeport Hydraulic Co. v. Sciortino, 138 Conn. 690, 692 ; Klahr v. Kostopoulos, 138 Conn. 653, 655 .

1984Klein v. Chatfield, 166 Conn. 76, 80 , 347 A.2d 58 (1974).

1981Hydro-Hercules Corporation v. Gary Excavating, Inc., 166 Conn. 647, 654 , 353 A.2d 714 (1974); Klein v. Chatfield, 166 Conn. 76, 80-81 , 347 A.2d 58 (1974); Brauer v. Freccia, 159 Conn. 289, 293 , 268 A.2d 645 (1970).

1984Klein v. Chatfield, 166 Conn. 76, 80 , 347 A.2d 58 (1974).

1981Hydro-Hercules Corporation v. Gary Excavating, Inc., 166 Conn. 647, 654 , 353 A.2d 714 (1974); Klein v. Chatfield, 166 Conn. 76, 80-81 , 347 A.2d 58 (1974); Brauer v. Freccia, 159 Conn. 289, 293 , 268 A.2d 645 (1970).

1977The conclusions must stand “unless they are legally or logically inconsistent with the facts found or unless they involve the application of some erroneous rule of law material to the ease.” Schnier v. Ives, 162 Conn. 171, 177 , 293 A.2d 1 .

1977The conclusions must stand “unless they are legally or logically inconsistent with the facts found or unless they involve the application of some erroneous rule of law material to the ease.” Schnier v. Ives, 162 Conn. 171, 177 , 293 A.2d 1 .

1973Connecticut Bank & Trust Co. v. Bovey, 162 Conn. 201, 205 , 292 A.2d 899 , The conclusions which the court reached must stand unless they are legally or logically inecnsistent with the facts found or unless they involve the application of some erroneous rule of law material to the case.

1973Connecticut Bank & Trust Co. v. Bovey, 162 Conn. 201, 205 , 292 A.2d 899 , The conclusions which the court reached must stand unless they are legally or logically inecnsistent with the facts found or unless they involve the application of some erroneous rule of law material to the case.

1986The motion urged finally that a dismissal should be granted “based on [the trial court’s] supervisory powers and in the interest of judicial economy.” The state argues, citing State v. Villafane, 164 Conn. 637, 641 , 325 A.2d 251 (1973), that the trial court’s conclusions cannot stand because they “are legally or logically inconsistent with the facts found or . . . they involve the application of some erroneous rule of law material to the case.” The state does concede, however, that the defendant has served his sentence and has been discharged from parole.

1986The motion urged finally that a dismissal should be granted “based on [the trial court’s] supervisory powers and in the interest of judicial economy.” The state argues, citing State v. Villafane, 164 Conn. 637, 641 , 325 A.2d 251 (1973), that the trial court’s conclusions cannot stand because they “are legally or logically inconsistent with the facts found or . . . they involve the application of some erroneous rule of law material to the case.” The state does concede, however, that the defendant has served his sentence and has been discharged from parole.

1977New Haven v. United Illuminating Co., 168 Conn. 478, 483 , 362 A.2d 785 ; Lonergan v. Connecticut Food Store, Inc., 168 Conn. 122, 124 , 357 A.2d 910 ; Johnston Jewels, Ltd. v. Leonard, 156 Conn. 75, 79 , 239 A.2d 500 .

1977New Haven v. United Illuminating Co., 168 Conn. 478, 483 , 362 A.2d 785 ; Lonergan v. Connecticut Food Store, Inc., 168 Conn. 122, 124 , 357 A.2d 910 ; Johnston Jewels, Ltd. v. Leonard, 156 Conn. 75, 79 , 239 A.2d 500 .

2018"Waiver is a question of fact.... [W]here the factual basis of the court's decision is challenged we must determine whether the facts set out in the memorandum of decision are supported by the evidence or whether, in light of the evidence and the pleadings in the whole record, those facts are clearly erroneous.... [T]he trial court's conclusions must stand unless they are legally or logically inconsistent with the facts found or unless they involve the application of some erroneous rule of law material to the case. ... [V]arious statutory and contract rights may be waived." (Citations omitted;

2018"Waiver is a question of fact.... [W]here the factual basis of the court's decision is challenged we must determine whether the facts set out in the memorandum of decision are supported by the evidence or whether, in light of the evidence and the pleadings in the whole record, those facts are clearly erroneous.... [T]he trial court's conclusions must stand unless they are legally or logically inconsistent with the facts found or unless they involve the application of some erroneous rule of law material to the case. ... [V]arious statutory and contract rights may be waived." (Citations omitted;

2011Partnership v. Stamford, 226 Conn. 92, 99-100 , 626 A.2d 1292 (1993) ("The trial court was presented with conflicting testimony as to the value of the property, and concluded that the report and testimony of the plaintiff's expert was the most credible.

2011Partnership v. Stamford, 226 Conn. 92, 99-100 , 626 A.2d 1292 (1993) ("The trial court was presented with conflicting testimony as to the value of the property, and concluded that the report and testimony of the plaintiff's expert was the most credible.

1978“The conclusions reached by the court must stand unless they are legally or logically inconsistent with the facts found or unless they involve the application of some erroneous rule of law material to the case.” (Emphasis added.) Lonergan v. Connecticut Food Store, Inc., 168 Conn. 122, 124 , 357 A.2d 910 .

1978“The conclusions reached by the court must stand unless they are legally or logically inconsistent with the facts found or unless they involve the application of some erroneous rule of law material to the case.” (Emphasis added.) Lonergan v. Connecticut Food Store, Inc., 168 Conn. 122, 124 , 357 A.2d 910 .

1964“The conclusions . . . must be tested by the facts as found and must stand unless they are legally or logically inconsistent with those facts or unless they involve the application of some erroneous rule of law material to the case.” Bridgeport Hydraulic Co. v. Sciortino, 138 Conn. 690, 692 ; Klahr v. Kostopoulos, supra. Since no corrections have been allowed in the finding, the conclusions must be tested by the facts found by the court.

1963“The conclusions . . . must be tested by the facts as found and must stand unless they are legally or logically inconsistent with those facts or unless they involve the application of some erroneous rule of law material to the case.” Bridgeport Hydraulic Co. v. Sciortino, 138 Conn. 690, 692 ; Klahr v. Kostopoulos, 138 Conn. 653, 655 .

1968Yale University v. Benneson, 147 Conn. 254, 255 ; Monick v. Greenwich, 144 Conn. 608, 611 ; Jack Torosian, Inc. v. Guastamachio, 139 Conn. 754, 757 ; Bridgeport Hydraulic Co. v. Sciortino, 138 Conn. 690, 692 .

1966Monick v. Greenwich, 144 Conn. 608, 611 , 136 A.2d 501 .” Yale University v. Benneson, 147 Conn. 254, 255 , 159 A.2d 169 .

2005Therefore, the trial court’s conclusions “must stand unless they are legally or logically inconsistent with the facts found or unless they involve the application of some erroneous rule of law material to the case.” Laske v. Hartford, 172 Conn. 515, 518 , 375 A.2d 996 (1977).

2005Therefore, the trial court’s conclusions “must stand unless they are legally or logically inconsistent with the facts found or unless they involve the application of some erroneous rule of law material to the case.” Laske v. Hartford, 172 Conn. 515, 518 , 375 A.2d 996 (1977).

1965Davis v. Margolis, 107 Conn. 417 , 422 . . . ; Skovronski v. Genovese, 124 Conn. 482 , 484 . . . .” Johnsons v. Shattuck, 125 Conn. 60, 62 .

1955Johnson v. Shattuck, 125 Conn. 60, 62 , 3 A.2d 229 ; Davis v. Margolis, 107 Conn. 417, 422 , 140 A. 823 .

2007The trial court’s conclusions must stand “unless they are legally or logically inconsistent with the facts found or unless they involve the application of some erroneous rule of law material to the case.” Id.

1975Esposito v. Commissioner of Transportation, 167 Conn. 439, 440 , 356 A.2d 175 ; Textron, Inc. v. Wood, 167 Conn. 334, 345 , 355 A.2d 307 .

1982“The conclusions reached must stand unless they are legally or logically inconsistent with the facts found or unless they involve the application of some erroneous rule of law material to the case.” Laske v. Hartford, 172 Conn. 515, 518 , 375 A.2d 996 (1977); Ross v. Ross, 172 Conn. 269, 275 , 374 A.2d 185 (1977); Johnston Jewels, Ltd. v. Leonard, 156 Conn. 75, 79 , 239 A.2d 500 (1968).

1982“The conclusions reached must stand unless they are legally or logically inconsistent with the facts found or unless they involve the application of some erroneous rule of law material to the case.” Laske v. Hartford, 172 Conn. 515, 518 , 375 A.2d 996 (1977); Ross v. Ross, 172 Conn. 269, 275 , 374 A.2d 185 (1977); Johnston Jewels, Ltd. v. Leonard, 156 Conn. 75, 79 , 239 A.2d 500 (1968).

1981Hydro-Hercules Corporation v. Gary Excavating, Inc., 166 Conn. 647, 654 , 353 A.2d 714 (1974); Klein v. Chatfield, 166 Conn. 76, 80-81 , 347 A.2d 58 (1974); Brauer v. Freccia, 159 Conn. 289, 293 , 268 A.2d 645 (1970).

1981Hydro-Hercules Corporation v. Gary Excavating, Inc., 166 Conn. 647, 654 , 353 A.2d 714 (1974); Klein v. Chatfield, 166 Conn. 76, 80-81 , 347 A.2d 58 (1974); Brauer v. Freccia, 159 Conn. 289, 293 , 268 A.2d 645 (1970).

1979Hames v. Hames, 163 Conn. 588, 592 .

1979Hames v. Hames, 163 Conn. 588 , 592 .

1975State v. Villafane, 164 Conn. 637, 641 , 325 A.2d 251 ; Lewis v. Lewis, 162 Conn. 476, 480 , 294 A.2d 637 ; Connecticut Bank & Trust Co. v. Bovey, 162 Conn. 201, 205-206 , 292 A.2d 899 .

1975State v. Villafane, 164 Conn. 637, 641 , 325 A.2d 251 ; Lewis v. Lewis, 162 Conn. 476, 480 , 294 A.2d 637 ; Connecticut Bank & Trust Co. v. Bovey, 162 Conn. 201, 205-206 , 292 A.2d 899 .

1972Covino v. Pfeffer, 160 Conn. 212, 216 , 276 A.2d 895 ; Mayock v. Martin, 157 Conn. 56, 62 , 245 A.2d 574 , cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1111 , 89 S. Ct. 924 , 21 L.

1972Covino v. Pfeffer, 160 Conn. 212, 216 , 276 A.2d 895 ; Mayock v. Martin, 157 Conn. 56, 62 , 245 A.2d 574 , cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1111 , 89 S. Ct. 924 , 21 L.

1969Pigeon v. Hatheway, 156 Conn. 175, 182 ; Yale University v. Benneson, 147 Conn. 254, 255 ; Klahr v. Kostopoulos, 138 Conn. 653, 655 .

1968Pigeon v. Hathaway, 156 Conn. 175, 182 ; Johnston Jewels, Ltd. v. Leonard, 156 Conn. 75, 79 .

1965Davis v. Margolis, 107 Conn. 417 , 422 . . . ; Skovronski v. Genovese, 124 Conn. 482 , 484 . . . .” Johnsons v. Shattuck, 125 Conn. 60, 62 .

1947Davis v. Margolis, 107 Conn. 417, 422 , 140 Atl. 823 ; Shovronski v. Genovese, 124 Conn. 482, 484 , 200 Atl. 575 .” Johnson v. Shattuck, 125 Conn. 60, 62 , 3 A. 2d 229 .