24 Texas opinions name it 2 courts 1997–2026 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
McCarty v. Texas Parks & Wildlife Departmentgreen2 sentences2020See McCarty v. Texas Parks & Wildlife Dep’t, 919 S.W.2d 853, 854 (Tex. App.—Austin 1996, no writ). 2013See McCarty v. Texas Parks & Wildlife Dep’t, 919 S.W.2d 853, 854 (Tex. App.—Austin 1996, no writ). | 6 | 6 |
Texas Association of Psychological Associates v. Texas State Board of Examiners of Psychologists and Texas Psychological Associationgreen2 sentences2021See Texas Ass’n of Psychological Assocs. v. Texas State Bd. of Exam’rs of Psychologists, 439 S.W.3d 597, 603 (Tex.App.--Austin 2014, no pet.). 2014See Texas Ass’n of Psychological Assocs. v. Texas State Bd. of Exam’rs of Psychologists, 439 S.W.3d 597, 603 (Tex.App.-Austin 2014, no pet.). | 3 | 3 |
Texas Home Management, Inc. v. Texas Department of Mental Health & Mental Retardationgreen2 sentences2001Texas Home Mgmt., Inc. v. Texas Dep’t of Mental Health & Mental Retardation, 953 S.W.2d 1, 3 (Tex.App. — Austin 1997, pet. denied). 2000Texas Home Mgmt., Inc. v. Texas Dep't of Mental Health & Mental Retardation , 953 S.W.2d 1, 3 (Tex. App.--Austin 1997, pet. denied). | 2 | 2 |
Texas State Board of Examiners v. Texas Medical Ass'ngreen2 sentences2026Ass’n, 511 S.W.3d 28, 33 (Tex. 2017) (to overcome the presumption that an administrative rule is valid, the party challenging the rule must show it “(1) contravenes specific statutory language; (2) runs counter to the general objectives of the statute; or (3) imposes additional burdens, conditions, or restrictions in excess of or inconsistent with the relevant statutory provisions”). 24 See Maxim Crane Works, L.P. v. Zurich Am. 2018We generally presume that an agency’s rules are valid, and a party challenging a rule bears the burden of proving its invalidity by showing that “the rule’s provisions are not in harmony with the general objectives of the act involved.” Id. (cleaned up). | 1 | 2 |
Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc. v. Shutegreen2 sentences2016In international contracts, forum clauses calling for foreign arbitral tribunals are enforceable even for antitrust and securities claims that would not be arbitrable domestically."" Finally, forum selection clauses arising in federal courts, designating another federal courts as the proper forum for disputes are deemed venue contracts "47See Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc. v. Shute, 499 U.S. 585, 597-98 (1991). 114See id. at 587-88 . 149See id. at 587-88 . ""oSee id at 588. ""'See id. "152See id. at 589 . ""See id. at 590-98 . "14See Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co., 407 U.S. 1, 15 (1972). "55See C 2016In international contracts, forum clauses calling for foreign arbitral tribunals are enforceable even for antitrust and securities claims that would not be arbitrable domestically."" Finally, forum selection clauses arising in federal courts, designating another federal courts as the proper forum for disputes are deemed venue contracts "47See Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc. v. Shute, 499 U.S. 585, 597-98 (1991). 114See id. at 587-88 . 149See id. at 587-88 . ""oSee id at 588. ""'See id. "152See id. at 589 . ""See id. at 590-98 . "14See Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co., 407 U.S. 1, 15 (1972). "55See C | 1 | 1 |
Scherk v. Alberto-Culver Co.green1 sentence2016In international contracts, forum clauses calling for foreign arbitral tribunals are enforceable even for antitrust and securities claims that would not be arbitrable domestically."" Finally, forum selection clauses arising in federal courts, designating another federal courts as the proper forum for disputes are deemed venue contracts "47See Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc. v. Shute, 499 U.S. 585, 597-98 (1991). 114See id. at 587-88 . 149See id. at 587-88 . ""oSee id at 588. ""'See id. "152See id. at 589 . ""See id. at 590-98 . "14See Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co., 407 U.S. 1, 15 (1972). "55See C | 1 | 1 |
The Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co.red2 sentences2016In international contracts, forum clauses calling for foreign arbitral tribunals are enforceable even for antitrust and securities claims that would not be arbitrable domestically."" Finally, forum selection clauses arising in federal courts, designating another federal courts as the proper forum for disputes are deemed venue contracts "47See Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc. v. Shute, 499 U.S. 585, 597-98 (1991). 114See id. at 587-88 . 149See id. at 587-88 . ""oSee id at 588. ""'See id. "152See id. at 589 . ""See id. at 590-98 . "14See Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co., 407 U.S. 1, 15 (1972). "55See C 2016In international contracts, forum clauses calling for foreign arbitral tribunals are enforceable even for antitrust and securities claims that would not be arbitrable domestically."" Finally, forum selection clauses arising in federal courts, designating another federal courts as the proper forum for disputes are deemed venue contracts "47See Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc. v. Shute, 499 U.S. 585, 597-98 (1991). 114See id. at 587-88 . 149See id. at 587-88 . ""oSee id at 588. ""'See id. "152See id. at 589 . ""See id. at 590-98 . "14See Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co., 407 U.S. 1, 15 (1972). "55See C | 1 | 1 |
Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.green1 sentence2016In international contracts, forum clauses calling for foreign arbitral tribunals are enforceable even for antitrust and securities claims that would not be arbitrable domestically."" Finally, forum selection clauses arising in federal courts, designating another federal courts as the proper forum for disputes are deemed venue contracts "47See Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc. v. Shute, 499 U.S. 585, 597-98 (1991). 114See id. at 587-88 . 149See id. at 587-88 . ""oSee id at 588. ""'See id. "152See id. at 589 . ""See id. at 590-98 . "14See Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co., 407 U.S. 1, 15 (1972). "55See C | 1 | 1 |
Texas Department of Transportation v. Sefzikgreen1 sentence2011See Sefzik, 2011 WL 5041969 at *3 ; Sawyer Trust, 2011 WL at *8. | 1 | 1 |
In Re U.S. Home Corp.green1 sentence2009IPA complains to this Court that the trial court abused its discretion by requiring IPA to prove that it showed the forum-selection clause to Riddell because: (1) there is no obligation to show a specific contractual provision to a party who signs a contract, In re U.S. Home Corp., 236 S.W.3d 761, 764 (Tex.2007), and (2) the burden of proof is not on the party seeking to enforce a forum-selection clause, but on the party challenging the clause. | 1 | 1 |
Browning-Ferris, Inc. v. Texas Department of Healthgreen1 sentence1999McCarty v. Texas Parks & Wildlife Dep't , 919 S.W.2d 853, 854 (Tex. App.--Austin 1996, no writ); Browning-Ferris, Inc. v. Texas Dep't of Health , 625 S.W.2d 764, 767 (Tex. App.--Austin 1981, writ ref'd n.r.e.). | 1 | 1 |
Chrysler Motors Corp. v. Texas Motor Vehicle Commissiongreen2 sentences1997See Chrysler Motors Corp. v. Texas Motor Vehicle Comm'n, 846 S.W.2d 139, 141 (Tex.App. Austin 1993, no writ). 1997See Chrysler Motors Corp. v. Texas Motor Vehicle Comm’n, 846 S.W.2d 139, 141 (Tex.App.—Austin 1993, no writ). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Carrollton-Farmers Branch Independent School District v. Edgewood Independent School District
green
2 sentences2002As Edgewood III indicates, in determining whether a tax is a state ad valorem tax, one compares the discretion afforded the local taxing authority with the control exercised by the State. 826 S.W.2d at 500-03 . 2002As Edge-wood III indicates, in determining whether a tax is a state ad valorem tax, one compares the discretion afforded the local taxing authority with the control exercised by the State. 826 S.W.2d at 500-03 . | 4 | 2002–2002 |
ElderCare Properties, Inc. v. Texas Department of Human Services
green
2 sentences2002Eldercare, 63 S.W.3d at 558 . 5 We recognize that Eldercare and Arco are cases involving challenges brought pursuant to the APA rather than PURA. 2002Eldercare, 63 S.W.3d at 558 . | 3 | 2002–2002 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.